Skip to main content

Intelligent Predictive Analytics for Identifying Students at Risk of Failure in Moodle Courses

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2020)

Abstract

Investigating the factors affecting students’ academic failure in online and/or blended courses by analyzing students’ learning behavior data gathered from Learning Management Systems (LMS) is a challenging area in intelligent learning analytics and education data mining area. It has been argued that the actual course design and the instructor’s intentions is critical to determine which variables meaningfully represent student effort that should be included/excluded from the list of predicting factors. In this paper we describe such an approach for identifying students at risk of failure in online courses. For the proof of our concept we used the data of two cohorts of an online course implemented in Moodle LMS. Using the data of the first cohort we developed a prediction model by experimenting with certain base classifiers available in Weka. To improve the observed performance of the experimented base classifiers, we enhanced further our model with the Majority Voting ensemble classifier. The final model was used at the next cohort of students in order to identify those at risk of failure before the final exam. The prediction accuracy of the model was high which show that the findings of such a process can be generalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U.: Predicting student performance from LMS data: a comparison of 17 blended courses using moodle LMS. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 17–29 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dawson, S., McWilliam, E., Tan, J.P.L.: Teaching smarter: how mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice. In: Proceeding of the International Conference ASCILITE 2008, pp. 221–230, Melbourne, Australia (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 40(6), 601–618 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Guest editorial: special issue on early prediction and supporting of learning performance. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(2), 145–147 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Macfadyen, L.P., Dawson, S.: Mining LMS data to develop an ‘‘early warning system” for educators: a proof of concept. Comput. Educ. 54, 588–599 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cerezo, R., Sanchez, M., Puerto, M.: Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: a case study in higher education. Comput. Educ. 96, 42–54 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Petropoulou, O., Kasimatis, K., Dimopoulos, I., Retalis, S.: LAe-R: a new learning analytics tool in Moodle for assessing students’ performance. Bull. IEEE Tech. Committee Learn. Technol. 16(1) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mor, Y., Craft, B., Hernández-Leo, D.: Editorial: the art and science of learning design. Res. Learn. Technol. 21 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laurillard, D.: Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, vol. 7625, pp. 41–42. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Empire Drive (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lokyer, L., Heathcote, E., Dawson, S.: Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1439–1459 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nistor, N., Neubauer, K.: From participation to dropout: quantitative participation patterns in online university courses. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 663–672 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Bryan, A.: “Scaling up” learning design: impact of learning design activities on LMS behavior and performance. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Learning Analytics Knowledge, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rienties, B., Nguyen, Q., Holmes, W., Reedy, K.: A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the Open University UK. Interact. Des. Arch. 33, 134–154 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jung, I.: The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 59, 445–464 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dondi, C., Moretti, M., Nascimbeni, F.: Quality of e-learning: negotiating a strategy, implementing a policy. In: Ehlers, U.D., Pawlowski, J.M. (eds.) Handbook on Quality and Standardization in e-Learning, pp. 31–50. Springer, Berlin (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32788-6_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aguiar, E., Chawla, N.V., Brockman, J., Ambrose, G.A., Goodrich, V.: Engagement vs performance: using electronic portfolios to predict first semester engineering student retention. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, pp 103–112, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 24–28 March (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rostaminezhad, M.A., Mozayani, N., Norozi, D., Iziy, M.: Factors related to e-learner dropout: case study of IUST elearning center. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 83, 522–527 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Seidman, A.: Minority student retention: resources for practitioners. New Dir. Inst. Res. 125, 7–24 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Tinto, V.: Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. University of Chicago Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. DeBerard, M.S., Spielmans, G.I., Julka, D.L.: Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: a longitudinal study. Coll. Stud. J. 38(1), 66–81 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang, G., Anderson, T.J., Ohland, M.W., Thorndyke, B.R.: Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: a longitudinal and cross-institutional study. J. Eng. Educ. 93(4), 313–320 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hu, Y.H., Lo, C.L., Shih, S.P.: Developing early warning systems to predict students’ online learning performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 469–478 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Frank, E., Hall, M.A., Witten, I.H.: The Weka Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th edn. Morgan Kaufmann (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sharable Content Object Reference Model. https://adlnet.gov/projects/scorm/. Accessed 06 Feb 2020

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Theodoros Anagnostopoulos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Anagnostopoulos, T., Kytagias, C., Xanthopoulos, T., Georgakopoulos, I., Salmon, I., Psaromiligkos, Y. (2020). Intelligent Predictive Analytics for Identifying Students at Risk of Failure in Moodle Courses. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49662-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49663-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics