Abstract
Investigating the factors affecting students’ academic failure in online and/or blended courses by analyzing students’ learning behavior data gathered from Learning Management Systems (LMS) is a challenging area in intelligent learning analytics and education data mining area. It has been argued that the actual course design and the instructor’s intentions is critical to determine which variables meaningfully represent student effort that should be included/excluded from the list of predicting factors. In this paper we describe such an approach for identifying students at risk of failure in online courses. For the proof of our concept we used the data of two cohorts of an online course implemented in Moodle LMS. Using the data of the first cohort we developed a prediction model by experimenting with certain base classifiers available in Weka. To improve the observed performance of the experimented base classifiers, we enhanced further our model with the Majority Voting ensemble classifier. The final model was used at the next cohort of students in order to identify those at risk of failure before the final exam. The prediction accuracy of the model was high which show that the findings of such a process can be generalized.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Conijn, R., Snijders, C., Kleingeld, A., Matzat, U.: Predicting student performance from LMS data: a comparison of 17 blended courses using moodle LMS. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 10(1), 17–29 (2017)
Dawson, S., McWilliam, E., Tan, J.P.L.: Teaching smarter: how mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice. In: Proceeding of the International Conference ASCILITE 2008, pp. 221–230, Melbourne, Australia (2008)
Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Educational data mining: a review of the state of the art. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 40(6), 601–618 (2010)
Romero, C., Ventura, S.: Guest editorial: special issue on early prediction and supporting of learning performance. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 12(2), 145–147 (2019)
Macfadyen, L.P., Dawson, S.: Mining LMS data to develop an ‘‘early warning system” for educators: a proof of concept. Comput. Educ. 54, 588–599 (2010)
Cerezo, R., Sanchez, M., Puerto, M.: Students’ LMS interaction patterns and their relationship with achievement: a case study in higher education. Comput. Educ. 96, 42–54 (2016)
Petropoulou, O., Kasimatis, K., Dimopoulos, I., Retalis, S.: LAe-R: a new learning analytics tool in Moodle for assessing students’ performance. Bull. IEEE Tech. Committee Learn. Technol. 16(1) (2014)
Mor, Y., Craft, B., Hernández-Leo, D.: Editorial: the art and science of learning design. Res. Learn. Technol. 21 (2013)
Laurillard, D.: Teaching as a Design Science: Building Pedagogical Patterns for Learning and Technology, vol. 7625, pp. 41–42. Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. Empire Drive (2012)
Lokyer, L., Heathcote, E., Dawson, S.: Informing pedagogical action: aligning learning analytics with learning design. Am. Behav. Sci. 57(10), 1439–1459 (2013)
Nistor, N., Neubauer, K.: From participation to dropout: quantitative participation patterns in online university courses. Comput. Educ. 55(2), 663–672 (2010)
Rienties, B., Toetenel, L., Bryan, A.: “Scaling up” learning design: impact of learning design activities on LMS behavior and performance. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Learning Analytics Knowledge, Poughkeepsie, NY, USA (2015)
Rienties, B., Nguyen, Q., Holmes, W., Reedy, K.: A review of ten years of implementation and research in aligning learning design with learning analytics at the Open University UK. Interact. Des. Arch. 33, 134–154 (2017)
Jung, I.: The dimensions of e-learning quality: from the learner’s perspective. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 59, 445–464 (2011)
Dondi, C., Moretti, M., Nascimbeni, F.: Quality of e-learning: negotiating a strategy, implementing a policy. In: Ehlers, U.D., Pawlowski, J.M. (eds.) Handbook on Quality and Standardization in e-Learning, pp. 31–50. Springer, Berlin (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-32788-6_3
Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109 (2004)
Aguiar, E., Chawla, N.V., Brockman, J., Ambrose, G.A., Goodrich, V.: Engagement vs performance: using electronic portfolios to predict first semester engineering student retention. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge, pp 103–112, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA, 24–28 March (2014)
Rostaminezhad, M.A., Mozayani, N., Norozi, D., Iziy, M.: Factors related to e-learner dropout: case study of IUST elearning center. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 83, 522–527 (2013)
Seidman, A.: Minority student retention: resources for practitioners. New Dir. Inst. Res. 125, 7–24 (2005)
Tinto, V.: Completing College: Rethinking Institutional Action. University of Chicago Press (2012)
DeBerard, M.S., Spielmans, G.I., Julka, D.L.: Predictors of academic achievement and retention among college freshmen: a longitudinal study. Coll. Stud. J. 38(1), 66–81 (2004)
Zhang, G., Anderson, T.J., Ohland, M.W., Thorndyke, B.R.: Identifying factors influencing engineering student graduation: a longitudinal and cross-institutional study. J. Eng. Educ. 93(4), 313–320 (2004)
Hu, Y.H., Lo, C.L., Shih, S.P.: Developing early warning systems to predict students’ online learning performance. Comput. Hum. Behav. 36, 469–478 (2014)
Frank, E., Hall, M.A., Witten, I.H.: The Weka Workbench. Online Appendix for “Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th edn. Morgan Kaufmann (2016)
Sharable Content Object Reference Model. https://adlnet.gov/projects/scorm/. Accessed 06 Feb 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Anagnostopoulos, T., Kytagias, C., Xanthopoulos, T., Georgakopoulos, I., Salmon, I., Psaromiligkos, Y. (2020). Intelligent Predictive Analytics for Identifying Students at Risk of Failure in Moodle Courses. In: Kumar, V., Troussas, C. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12149. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49663-0_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49662-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49663-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)