Abstract
Advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) are intelligent systems that can help vehicle drivers to drive with ease and safety. A growing body of ADAS technologies bring benefits to vehicle drivers. However, understanding increasing ADAS terminologies becomes a potential problem for ordinary drivers. An individual open card sorting study was conducted to test Chinese driver’s mental model of ADAS categories.
14 private car drivers were invited to do card sorting, visualizing their mental model of ADAS function categorization. 18 ADAS-related terminologies and their brief explanations were printed on separate paper cards. Participants are told to sort these cards into groups and then name their card groups as what they would want to see in their own cars.
To analyze card sorting result, 2 researchers merged similar group names into 7 groups: Driving Assist, Collision Prevention, Safety Setting, Parking Assist, Start-Stop Assist, Information, and General. 15 out of 18 cards can be clearly grouped, being put under the same group by more than (or equals) 40% participants. 3 out of 7 group get cards clearly followed. They are Driving Assist, Collision Prevention, and Parking Assist. We also compare the result with Troppmann’s Model and United States Department of Transportation (NHTSA, 2020) Model and find Chinese drivers tend to use a different driving status clue.
The result suggests ADAS technology categories maybe different between industry practice and Chinese private drivers’ mental model. Culture influence and ADAS knowledge can be possible reasons for the difference.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download conference paper PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Introduction
1.1 Adoption of ADAS
Road safety is believed to be mainly impaired by ‘human factor’ [1]. 90% of traffic accidents are caused by human failure, including fatigue, inattention, alcohol and etc.
Therefore, researchers, professionals and governments try to countermeasure ‘human factor’ with driving assistant systems. Effective ADAS can reduce 70% crash rate. In real world, according to the 2005–2008 U.S. GES Crash Records, ADAS technologies successfully reduced light vehicles’ crashes by 32.99% and heavy trucks’ crashes by 40.88% [2].
In 2003, European Union opened ‘eSafety’ program. In 2005, America started assessment of ‘Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety System’. In 1991, Japan started ‘Advanced Safety Vehicle Development Program’. These programs have facilitated ADAS adoption in major vehicle markets [3]. From policy perspective, China acts slow in this area. Till ‘Made in Chine 2025’ (2015), China officially encourages ADAS technologies’ development and adoption [4].
1.2 Understanding of ADAS Scope
Troppmann’s Model
Troppmann (2006) depicts ADAS technologies in Active-Safety dimensions [5]. In Active dimension, technologies are allocated to demonstrate the degree of machine control: they are just text reminders or can take over the vehicle control from its driver. In Safety dimension, technologies are arranged to show their Safety impact: they are crash-avoiding or making driving easier (Fig. 1).
According to this framework, ADAS technologies can be categorized as:
Collision Mitigation (Active-Safety)
-
Collision Avoidance
-
Automatic Emergency Braking
-
Hazard Braking
-
Braking Preparation
Vehicle Control (Active-no-Safety).
-
Longitudinal Control
-
Lateral Control
-
Adaptive Cruise Control Stop &Go
-
Adaptive Cruise Control Stop &Roll
-
Adaptive Cruise Control
Passive Safety (Passive-Safety)
-
Traffic Member Recognition
-
Collision Warning
-
Pre-Crash
Driver Support (Passive-no-Safety)
-
Parking Assistance
-
Parking Aid
-
Blind Spot Detection
-
Night Vision
-
Lane Departure warning
NHTSA Model
America’s National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA, 2020) describes ADAS as Driver Assistance Technologies on its website to public [6]. It has 4 categories: Forward Collision Prevention, Backing Up &Parking, Lane &Side Assist, Maintaining Safe Distance.
Forward Collision Prevention
-
Forward Collision Warning
-
Automatic Emergency Braking
-
Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking
-
Adaptive Lighting
Backing up &Parking
-
Rear Automatic Braking
-
Rear Video System or Backup Camera
-
Rear Cross Traffic Alert
Lane & Side Assist
-
Lane Departure Warning
-
Lane Keeping Assist
-
Blind Spot Detection
-
Lane Centering Assist
Maintaining Safe Distance
-
Traffic Jam Assist
-
Highway Pilot
-
Adaptive Cruise Control
ADAS is a collection of systems and subsystems that transform manual driving to autonomous driving. Though it has a relative clear main purpose, its sub-categories can be slightly various in different researches.
1.3 Challenge of ADAS Category Design
All category models above could be references for in-car HMI designers to structure ADAS manual/setting system. And we can learn the categorizing strategy from both models. In Troppmann’s Model, drivers need understand the vehicle’s active control level and safety impact. In NHTSA’s category, drivers should tell the technological configuration difference of ADAS functions.
However, all models above cannot directly represent Chinese drivers’ understanding of ADAS Category. Although China’s vehicle ownership grows rapidly, it is far behind major developed countries, like United States. Chinese drivers probably have less knowledge about ADAS. Also, China has a large population. People’s concern about ADAS may vary from other countries.
Based on these references and manufacturer information, we design a card sorting study to examine Chinese customers’ mental model of ADAS categories. In this study, we will compare drivers’ mental model with these 2 existed models to reveal ordinary drivers’ grouping strategy.
2 Method
2.1 Material
Based on collaborating manufacturer information, we prepare 18 ADAS terminology paper cards. Every card is about 5 cm × 4 cm with the terminology name and a brief explanation on it (Table 1).
2.2 Participants
14 private car drivers participate this study. Their driving experience range from 5 months to 8 years. All of them have ADAS function using experience (Table 2).
2.3 Procedures
It is an individual open card-sorting research design, each participant sorts cards individually. There is no number limit on group quantities and participants could name their sorted groups by their own language. In this study, each participant trial takes about a half hour in conduct.
Step 1 - Understand 18 ADAS terminologies.
18 ADAS-related terminologies and their brief explanations were printed on separate paper cards. A participant has enough time to read these cards and ask questions until he/she is well prepared to do the card sorting.
Since all participants have ADAS feature using experience, with brief explanation along with the terminology, they can understand these 18 ADAS terminologies easily. No one ask for further terminological explanation, but some inquiry about the technological feasibility in real products. For example, some participants show interests on Traffic Sign Recognition technological feasibility.
Step 2 - Sort 18 ADAS terminologies into groups.
Participants are told to sort these cards into groups that could show the relationship of cards in their mental model. Participants are encouraged to do a rough categorization first, and then refine it on the second round.
Step 3 Name the groups.
Participants are told to name their card groups as what they would want to see in their own car. They were given blank cards to write down those names and put them on the top of related card stacks. They can organize these ADAS terminologies in their own language, not limited to existed models (Fig. 2).
3 Result
3.1 Category Distribution
To analyze card sorting result, 2 researchers merged similar group names into 7 groups based on participant interview: Driving Assist, Collision Prevention, Parking Assist, Safety Setting, General, Information, and Start-Stop Assist, showing in Table 3.
The percentage represents the ratio of participants who group a terminology under this category. The background color goes deeper as the number increases.
12 out of 18 cards can be clearly grouped, being put under the same group by more than (or equals) 50% participants. 6 terminologies that cannot be clearly grouped are Auto Hold, Blind Spot Detection, Traffic Sign Recognition, Pedestrian Detection, Automatic Post-Collision Braking, and Rear Cross Traffic Alert. If we set 40% as the group reference, Auto Hold can be grouped into Driving Assist, and Pedestrian Detection, Rear Cross Traffic Alert into Collision Prevention. 3 out of 7 group get cards clearly followed. They are Driving Assist, Collision Prevention, and Parking Assist.
3.2 Model Comparison
In Table 4, we compare mental model extracted in this study with Troppmann’s Model and NHTSA Model. We can find that participants tend to organize terminologies by driving status: driving, colliding, and parking.
Unlike the Active concern in Troppmann’s model, participants are not so aware of ADAS’s vehicle control extent. Also, participants would not differentiate assists from which sides of the vehicle. Therefore, some category scope differs from what in NHTSA Model. For example, Lane Keeping Assist is categorized into Lane &Side Assist in NHTSA Model, while it’s labeled as Driving Assist with Cruise Control in this study (Maintaining Safe Distance in NHTSA).
4 Discussion
4.1 Inspiration for in-Car HMI Design
This study reveals normal drivers’ mental model of ADAS functions that in-car HMI designer can exploit. Optimizing the manual/setting information architecture based on the study model, drivers can have a higher probability to find the target function items easily.
The results demonstrate that drivers are incline to group these functions according to driving status. They are not so aware of vehicle’s active control level and which direction side the function is tackling.
This phenomenon suggests liability between ADAS and drivers is ambiguous in driver’s mental model. In current situation, all liabilities are on drivers’ side. So, they do not argue for machine’s liability. However, once cars become more autonomous, technology’s liability may be need to clearly informed to drivers and considered by lawmakers.
This phenomenon also suggests drivers are not familiar with technology configuration. No matter collision detection in the front or in the back, they tend to group all these function as ‘Collision Prevention’. Once they get more technology familiarity, they may incline to group as NHTSA Model.
4.2 Limitation of Card Sorting
The card sorting method makes it more reasonable to retrieve information from the structure when users browse information, but it is difficult to solve personalized settings, such as shortening the information level of common settings. Designers should consider shortcuts, i.e. ‘my collection’, to empower user personalize their in-car HMI, reducing the search cost of users.
4.3 Limitation of Sample Representation
This study suggests Chinese drivers using driving status as a clue to group ADAS technologies. However, whether all ordinary drivers tend to use this strategy need to test in other country and culture as well. It is possible in other culture, with more technological knowledge, people will agree to Troppmann’s Model or NHTSA Model. And we can dig deep into the influence of clear vehicle active control level, safety impact and technological configuration.
References
Brookhuis, K.A., Waard, D.D., Janssen, W.H.: Behavioural impacts of advanced driver assistance systems-an overview. Eur. J. Transp. Inf. Res. 1(3), 245–253 (2001). https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2001.1.3.3667
Yue, L., Abdel-Aty, M., Wu, Y., Wang, L.: Assessment of the safety benefits of vehicles’ advanced driver assistance, connectivity and low level automation systems. Accid. Anal. Prev. 117, 55–64 (2018)
Ma, J., Cao, J.: Research on developing trend of automotive advanced driver assistant system based on specific market demand in China. Agric. Equip. Veh. Eng. 50(3), 5–10 (2012)
Made in China 2025. http://www.miit.gov.cn/n973401/n1234620/. Accessed 22 Jan 2020
Troppmann, R.: Tech tutorial: driver assistance systems, an introduction to adaptive cruise control: part 1(2006). http://www.automotivedesignline.com/howto/189600772
NHTSA’s Driver Assistance Technologies webpage. https://www.nhtsa.gov/equipment/driver-assistance-technologies. Accessed 22 Jan 2020
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Li, L., Chang, H., Sun, W., Guo, J., Gao, J. (2020). How Drivers Categorize ADAS Functions. In: Rau, PL. (eds) Cross-Cultural Design. User Experience of Products, Services, and Intelligent Environments. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12192. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49788-0_46
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49788-0_46
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-49787-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-49788-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)