Abstract
In healthcare, clinical activities are increasingly being relocated to patients’ home environment. Patients can thus continue their therapy in a self-determined manner at home. This trend challenges usability evaluations of medical devices, as patients represent a more heterogeneous user group in terms of experience and training than medical professionals and the use of medical devices by patients can also be influenced by their medical condition. The Emergency Usability Lab was developed as an approach for testing the usability of medical devices of home healthcare focusing on emergency situations. An emergency situation is determined as a situation the patient has to perform certain activities with a medical device while being limited in performance due to certain medical symptoms as dizziness, visual impairment or being short of breath.
This paper presents the results of the practical evaluation of the Emergency Usability Lab. Evaluation was carried out applying a between-group design. Within the study, two approved medical devices (blood glucose meter & emergency drug package) were subjected to a usability test. Each product was tested in two groups. In one group the Emergency Usability Lab was applied and the other served as control group. Both groups included 20 participants each. By using the Emergency Usability Lab, a blood glucose meter was tested under simulated conditions of hypoglycemia (lack of concentration and impaired vision) and an emergency drug package was tested under simulated conditions of pain-related shortness of breath (shortness of breath, dizziness and impaired vision). The results of both usability studies were compared with regard to the number of usability issues found and their risk in order to verify the applicability of the Emergency Usability Lab.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Carroll, M.F., Burge, M.R., Schade, D.S.: Severe hypoglycemia in adults. Rev. Endocr. Metabol. Disord. 4(2), 149–157 (2003)
Bausewein, C., Simon, S.T.: Shortness of breath and cough in patients in palliative care. Deutsches Ärzteblatt Int. 110(33–34), 563 (2013)
Neyer, F.J., Felber, J., Gebhardt, C.: Entwicklung und Validierung einer Kurzskala zur Erfassung von Technikbereitschaft. Diagnostica 58(2), 87–99 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000067
RoÈ thlin, F., Pelikan, JM., Ganahl, K.: Die Gesundheitskompetenz der 15-jaÈhrigen Jugendlichen in Oesterreich. In: Abschlussbericht der oÈsterreichischen Gesundheitskompetenz Jugendstudie im Auftrag des Hauptverbands der oÈsterreichischen SozialversicherungstraÈger (HVSV). http://lbihpr.lbg.ac.at.w8.netz-werk.com/sites/files/lbihpr/attachments/hljugend_bericht.pdf. Accessed: 2017–09-19. (Archived by WebCite® at http://www.webcitation.org/6taVAKBVo). Accessed 19 Sep 2017
Hls-Eu Consortium. Comparative Report of Health Literacy in Eight EU Member States. In: The European Health Literacy Survey HLS-EU (2012)
Zijlstra, F.: Efficiency in work behaviour. In: A Design Approach for Modern Tools. In: Ph.D. thesis, TU Delft, Delft University of Technology. 1993. Available: http://repository.tudelft.nl/assets/uuid:d97a028b-c3dc-4930-b2ab-a7877993a17f/ide_zijlstra_19931123.PDF
Otto, T., Zijlstra, F.R.H., Goebel, R.: Neural correlates of mental effort evaluation-involvement of structures related to self-awareness. Soc. Cogn. Affect Neurosci. 9(3), 307–315 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss136
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index). Results of empirical and theoretical research. Hum. Mental Workload 1(3), 139–183 (1988)
Pfützner, A., Mitri, M., Musholt, P.B., Sachsenheimer, D., Borchert, M., Yap, A., et al.: Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 28(4), 525–531 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1185/03007995.2012.673479. PMID: 22435798
Rasche, P., Mertens, A., Miron-Shatz, T., Berzon, C., Schlick, C.M., Jahn, M., et al.: Seamless recording of glucometer measurements among older experienced diabetic patients ±A study of perception and usability. PLoS ONE 13(5), e0197455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197455
Rasche, P., Mertens, A., Schlick, Christopher M.: Emergency usability lab - concept to evaluate the usability of healthcare systems in emergencies. In: Duffy, Vincent G. (ed.) DHM 2017. LNCS, vol. 10287, pp. 354–364. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58466-9_32
Benoit, A., Malla, A.K., Iyer, S.N., Joober, R., Bherer, L., Lepage, M.: Cognitive deficits characterization using the CogState research battery in first-episode psychosis patients. Schizophr Res. Cogn. 2(3), 140–145 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scog.2015.03.006
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rasche, P., Richter, M., Schäfer, K., Theis, S., Nitsch, V., Mertens, A. (2020). Practical Evaluation of the Emergency Usability Lab for Testing the Usability of Medical Devices in Emergency Situations. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Technologies, Design and User Experience. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12207. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50252-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50251-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50252-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)