Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Flip-Flop Quizzes: A Case Study Analysis to Inform the Design of Augmented Cognition Applications

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Augmented Cognition. Human Cognition and Behavior (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12197))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1385 Accesses

Abstract

This paper examines the effectiveness of Flip-Flop quizzes, a pedagogical methodology in which students create quizzes synchronized with lecture videos as part of an inverted classroom. In order to generate quality quizzes, students must understand the material covered in the lecture videos. The results of our study inform the design of augmented cognition applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Camp, T., Zweben, S., Walker, E., Barker, L.: Booming enrollments: good times? In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2015, pp. 80–81. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677333

  2. Guzdial, M.: ‘Generation CS’ drives growth in enrollments. Commun. ACM 60(7), 10–11 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3088245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zweben, S., Bizot, B.: CRA Taulbee Survey, May 2018. https://cra.org/resources/taulbee-survey/

  4. Institute of Educational Sciences: Total fall enrollment in degree-granting postsecondary institutions, by attendance status, sex of student, and control of institution: Selected years, 1947 through 2027, January 2018. https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d17/tables/dt17_303.10.asp

  5. Beaubouef, T., Mason, J.: Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations. SIGCSE Bull. 37(2), 103–106 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1083431.1083474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bennedsen, J., Caspersen, M.E.: Failure rates in introductory programming: 12 years later. ACM Inroads 10(2), 30–36 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3324888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Watson, C., Li, F.W.: Failure rates in introductory programming revisited. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Innovation & Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE 2014, pp. 39–44. ACM, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2591749

  8. Lewis, C.M., Titterton, N., Clancy, M.: Using collaboration to overcome disparities in Java experience. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER 2012, pp. 79–86. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2361276.2361292

  9. Lizzio, A., Wilson, K., Simons, R.: University students’ perceptions of the learning environment and academic outcomes: implications for theory and practice. Stud. High. Educ. 27(1), 27–52 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120099359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Waterhouse, F.: Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. High. Educ. (00181560) 37(1), 57–70 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1003548313194

  11. Ulriksen, L., Madsen, L.M., Holmegaard, H.T.: What do we know about explanations for drop out/opt out among young people from STM higher education programmes? Stud. Sci. Educ. 46(2), 209–244 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2010.504549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bishop, J.L., Verleger, M.A., et al.: The flipped classroom: a survey of the research. In: ASEE National Conference Proceedings, Atlanta, GA, vol. 30, pp. 1–18 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gilboy, M.B., Heinerichs, S., Pazzaglia, G.: Enhancing student engagement using the flipped classroom. J. Nutr. Educ. Behav. 47(1), 109–114 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2014.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horton, D., Craig, M.: Drop, fail, pass, continue: persistence in CS1 and beyond in traditional and inverted delivery. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2015, pp. 235–240. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677273

  15. Latulipe, C., Long, N.B., Seminario, C.E.: Structuring flipped classes with lightweight teams and gamification. In: Proceedings of the 46th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2015, pp. 392–397. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2676723.2677240

  16. O’Flaherty, J., Phillips, C.: The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: a scoping review. Internet High. Educ. 25, 85–95 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon, B., Kohanfars, M., Lee, J., Tamayo, K., Cutts, Q.: Experience report: peer instruction in introductory computing. In: Proceedings of the 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2010, pp. 341–345. ACM, New York (2010). https://doi.org/10.1145/1734263.1734381

  18. Duran, D.: Learning-by-teaching. Evidence and implications as a pedagogical mechanism. Innov. Educ. Teach. Int. 54(5), 476–484 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2016.1156011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Stelovska, U., Stelovsky, J., Wu, J.: Constructive learning using flip-flop methodology: learning by making quizzes synchronized with video recording of lectures. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2016. LNCS, vol. 9753, pp. 70–81. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39483-1_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Stelovsky, J., Ogata, B., Stelovska, U.: “Flip-Flop” learning by teaching methodologies: “Peer Improvement”, “Agile Tooltip”, support technology, and next steps. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10925, pp. 391–406. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Ogawa, M.-B.: Evaluation of flip-flop learning methodology. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) LCT 2018. LNCS, vol. 10925, pp. 350–360. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Bloom, B.S., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D.: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain, 2nd edn. David McKay Company, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information and Computer Sciences, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, 1680 East-West Road, Honolulu, HI, 96822, USA

    Branden Ogata, Jan Stelovsky & Michael-Brian C. Ogawa

Authors
  1. Branden Ogata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Stelovsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Michael-Brian C. Ogawa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Branden Ogata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Soar Technology Inc., Orlando, FL, USA

    Dylan D. Schmorrow

  2. Design Interactive, Inc., Orlando, FL, USA

    Cali M. Fidopiastis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ogata, B., Stelovsky, J., Ogawa, MB.C. (2020). Flip-Flop Quizzes: A Case Study Analysis to Inform the Design of Augmented Cognition Applications. In: Schmorrow, D., Fidopiastis, C. (eds) Augmented Cognition. Human Cognition and Behavior. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12197. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50439-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50439-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50438-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50439-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation