Skip to main content

“RemoteMentor” Evaluation of Interactions Between Teenage Girls, Remote Tutors, and Coding Activities in School Lessons

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing, Developing and Deploying Learning Experiences (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12205))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Research points at various factors for the low and even decreasing proportion of women in the IT sector in developed countries, e.g., psychological causes, social factors, or structural conditions. These possible explanations all have one thing in common: they recognize adolescence as the essential confidence-building phase in girls. Girls aged 12 to 15 years old seem to lose interest in computer science (CS). Providing mentors and female role models are two key elements to counteract gender stereotypes in CS. “RemoteMentor”, a joint Austrian research project brought these two approaches together and expanded them in the form of “remote tutoring”: female students aged 14 to 15 received one-on-one human support through smartphones for their coding project during their regular CS and arts lessons. The aim of the one year investigation was to analyse gender aspects in the tutoring process and the output of the collaborative coding project. This was done with group discussions, the evaluation of the online tutoring units and an analysis of the final games in regard to the applied Computational Thinking concepts. Results showed that the project was a promising approach to support and motivate at least a certain group of female students in coding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abbiss, J.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Gender Educ. 20(2), 153–165 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Archard, N.: Rethinking the ‘problem’ of gender and IT schooling: discourses in literature. Mentoring Tutor. Partnership Learn. 20(4), 451–472 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beyer, S.: Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Comput. Sci. Educ. 24(2–3), 153–192 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Blake-Beard, S., et al.: Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: keeping our eyes on the prize. J. Soc. Issues 67(3), 622–643 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Charmaz, K.: Den Standpunkt verändern: Methoden der konstruktivistischen Grounded Theory. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (Hg.): Grounded theory reader. 2. aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. pp. 181–205 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4_9

  6. Cheryan, S., Master, A., Meltzoff, N.: Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Gend. Technol. 6(49), 37–53 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Committee on European Computing Education (CECE): Informatics Education in Europe: Are We All In The Same Boat? Report by The Committee on European Computing Education. Jointly established by Informatics Europe & ACM Europe. https://www.informatics-europe.org/component/phocadownload/category/10-reports.html?download=60:cece-report. Accessed 16 May 2019

  8. Ensher, E., Ellen, A., Heun, C., Blanchard, A.: Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: new directions in research. J. Vocat. Behav. 63(2), 264–288 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Faulkner, W.: The technology question in feminism. A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Stud. Int. Forum 24(1), 79–95 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finzel, B., Deininger, H., Schmid, U.: From beliefs to intention: mentoring as an approach to motivate female high school students to enrol in computer science studies. In: Marsden, N., Wulf, V., Rode, J. Weibert, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT - GenderIT 2018, pp. 251–260. ACM Press, New York (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Flick, U.: Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einfüahrung. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guzman, I.R., Stanton, J.M.: Women’s adaptation to the IT culture. Women’s Stud. 37(3), 202–228 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hur, J.W., Andrzejewski, C.E., Marghitu, D.: Girls and computer science: experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations. Comput. Sci. Educ. 27(2), 100–120 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jaime, S., Ruby, O: Problem Solving and Collaboration Using Mobile Serious Games. Elsevier Ltd. (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kafai, Y., Burke, Q.: Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan 95(1), 61 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Khare, R., Sahai, E., Pramanick, I.: Remote Mentoring Young Females in STEM through MAGIC. GetMAGIC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Google. http://linc.mit.edu/linc2013/proceedings/Session7/Session7Pramanick-Sahai.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2019

  18. Kerr, B., Robinson, K., Sharon, E.: Encouraging talented girls in math and science: effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Stud. 15(1), 85–102 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kessels, U., Heyder, A., Latsch, M., Hannover, B.: How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity. Educ. Res. 56(2), 220–229 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kessels, U.: Bridging the gap by enhancing the fit: how stereotypes about STEM clash with stereotypes about girls. Int. J. Gender Sci. Technol. 7(2), 280–296 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Moreno-Leon, J., Robles, G., Roman-Gonzalez, M.: Examining the relationship between socialization and improved software development skills in the scratch code learning environment. J. UCS 22(12), 1533–1557 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mulac, A., et al.: Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: the gender-linked language effect. Commun. Monograph. 55(4), 315–335 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Neuhaus, J., Borowski, A.: Self-to-prototype similarity as a mediator between gender and students’ interest in learning to code. Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol. 10(2), 233–252 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Resnick, M., et al.: Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM 52(11), 60–67 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rich, P.J., Hodges, C.B.: Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Springer, Berlin (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Stoeger, H., et al.: The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Comput. Educ. 69, 408–418 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Vitores, A., Gil-Juarez, A.: The trouble with ‘women in computing’: a critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. J. Gend. Stud. 25(6), 666–680 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wajcman, J.: From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Inf. Commun. Soc. 10(3), 287–298 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. West, C., Zimmerman, D.H.: Doing Gender. Gend. Soc. 1(2), 125–151 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wing, J.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernadette Spieler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Spieler, B., Mikats, J., Valentin, S., Oates-Indruchová, L., Slany, W. (2020). “RemoteMentor” Evaluation of Interactions Between Teenage Girls, Remote Tutors, and Coding Activities in School Lessons. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing, Developing and Deploying Learning Experiences. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12205. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_40

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50512-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50513-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics