Abstract
Research points at various factors for the low and even decreasing proportion of women in the IT sector in developed countries, e.g., psychological causes, social factors, or structural conditions. These possible explanations all have one thing in common: they recognize adolescence as the essential confidence-building phase in girls. Girls aged 12 to 15 years old seem to lose interest in computer science (CS). Providing mentors and female role models are two key elements to counteract gender stereotypes in CS. “RemoteMentor”, a joint Austrian research project brought these two approaches together and expanded them in the form of “remote tutoring”: female students aged 14 to 15 received one-on-one human support through smartphones for their coding project during their regular CS and arts lessons. The aim of the one year investigation was to analyse gender aspects in the tutoring process and the output of the collaborative coding project. This was done with group discussions, the evaluation of the online tutoring units and an analysis of the final games in regard to the applied Computational Thinking concepts. Results showed that the project was a promising approach to support and motivate at least a certain group of female students in coding.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbiss, J.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Gender Educ. 20(2), 153–165 (2008)
Archard, N.: Rethinking the ‘problem’ of gender and IT schooling: discourses in literature. Mentoring Tutor. Partnership Learn. 20(4), 451–472 (2012)
Beyer, S.: Why are women underrepresented in computer science? Gender differences in stereotypes, self-efficacy, values, and interests and predictors of future CS course-taking and grades. Comput. Sci. Educ. 24(2–3), 153–192 (2014)
Blake-Beard, S., et al.: Matching by race and gender in mentoring relationships: keeping our eyes on the prize. J. Soc. Issues 67(3), 622–643 (2011)
Charmaz, K.: Den Standpunkt verändern: Methoden der konstruktivistischen Grounded Theory. In: Mey, G., Mruck, K. (Hg.): Grounded theory reader. 2. aktualisierte und erweiterte Auflage Wiesbaden: VS-Verlag. pp. 181–205 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93318-4_9
Cheryan, S., Master, A., Meltzoff, N.: Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Gend. Technol. 6(49), 37–53 (2015)
Committee on European Computing Education (CECE): Informatics Education in Europe: Are We All In The Same Boat? Report by The Committee on European Computing Education. Jointly established by Informatics Europe & ACM Europe. https://www.informatics-europe.org/component/phocadownload/category/10-reports.html?download=60:cece-report. Accessed 16 May 2019
Ensher, E., Ellen, A., Heun, C., Blanchard, A.: Online mentoring and computer-mediated communication: new directions in research. J. Vocat. Behav. 63(2), 264–288 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8791(03)00044-7
Faulkner, W.: The technology question in feminism. A view from feminist technology studies. Women’s Stud. Int. Forum 24(1), 79–95 (2001)
Finzel, B., Deininger, H., Schmid, U.: From beliefs to intention: mentoring as an approach to motivate female high school students to enrol in computer science studies. In: Marsden, N., Wulf, V., Rode, J. Weibert, A. (eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Gender & IT - GenderIT 2018, pp. 251–260. ACM Press, New York (2018)
Flick, U.: Qualitative Sozialforschung. Eine Einfüahrung. Rowohlt Taschenbuch Verlag, Reinbek bei Hamburg (2009)
Guzman, I.R., Stanton, J.M.: Women’s adaptation to the IT culture. Women’s Stud. 37(3), 202–228 (2008)
Hur, J.W., Andrzejewski, C.E., Marghitu, D.: Girls and computer science: experiences, perceptions, and career aspirations. Comput. Sci. Educ. 27(2), 100–120 (2017)
Hsieh, H.-F., Shannon, S.E.: Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual. Health Res. 15(9), 1277–1288 (2005)
Jaime, S., Ruby, O: Problem Solving and Collaboration Using Mobile Serious Games. Elsevier Ltd. (2011)
Kafai, Y., Burke, Q.: Computer programming goes back to school. Phi Delta Kappan 95(1), 61 (2013)
Khare, R., Sahai, E., Pramanick, I.: Remote Mentoring Young Females in STEM through MAGIC. GetMAGIC, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Google. http://linc.mit.edu/linc2013/proceedings/Session7/Session7Pramanick-Sahai.pdf. Accessed 18 Apr 2019
Kerr, B., Robinson, K., Sharon, E.: Encouraging talented girls in math and science: effects of a guidance intervention. High Ability Stud. 15(1), 85–102 (2004)
Kessels, U., Heyder, A., Latsch, M., Hannover, B.: How gender differences in academic engagement relate to students’ gender identity. Educ. Res. 56(2), 220–229 (2014)
Kessels, U.: Bridging the gap by enhancing the fit: how stereotypes about STEM clash with stereotypes about girls. Int. J. Gender Sci. Technol. 7(2), 280–296 (2015)
Moreno-Leon, J., Robles, G., Roman-Gonzalez, M.: Examining the relationship between socialization and improved software development skills in the scratch code learning environment. J. UCS 22(12), 1533–1557 (2016)
Mulac, A., et al.: Male/female language differences and effects in same-sex and mixed-sex dyads: the gender-linked language effect. Commun. Monograph. 55(4), 315–335 (1988)
Neuhaus, J., Borowski, A.: Self-to-prototype similarity as a mediator between gender and students’ interest in learning to code. Int. J. Gend. Sci. Technol. 10(2), 233–252 (2018)
Resnick, M., et al.: Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM 52(11), 60–67 (2009)
Rich, P.J., Hodges, C.B.: Emerging Research, Practice, and Policy on Computational Thinking. Springer, Berlin (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52691-1
Stoeger, H., et al.: The effectiveness of a one-year online mentoring program for girls in STEM. Comput. Educ. 69, 408–418 (2013)
Vitores, A., Gil-Juarez, A.: The trouble with ‘women in computing’: a critical examination of the deployment of research on the gender gap in computer science. J. Gend. Stud. 25(6), 666–680 (2016)
Wajcman, J.: From women and technology to gendered technoscience. Inf. Commun. Soc. 10(3), 287–298 (2007)
West, C., Zimmerman, D.H.: Doing Gender. Gend. Soc. 1(2), 125–151 (1987)
Wing, J.: Computational thinking. Commun. ACM 49(3), 33–35 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Spieler, B., Mikats, J., Valentin, S., Oates-Indruchová, L., Slany, W. (2020). “RemoteMentor” Evaluation of Interactions Between Teenage Girls, Remote Tutors, and Coding Activities in School Lessons. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Designing, Developing and Deploying Learning Experiences. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12205. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_40
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50513-4_40
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50512-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50513-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)