Abstract
The emergence of mobile-based transportation and transaction is rapidly gaining popularity, particularly among urbanized areas. Thus, paper sought to illustration the evolution of GoJek as a form of public transportation through the lens of statutory law, government policies, and other public documents that are related to what GoJek has become today. Other relevant topics related to the emergence of GoJek such as transportation, MSME and economic matters are also discussed. The setting/context for this study will be Indonesian policies and the characters such as ride-hailing companies and the public. Law and regulations from January 2010 until December of 2019 were gathered using text mining. Collected data were then analysed with the help of a qualitative data analysis software called NVivo. Finding shows that GoJek has become the most prominent ride-haling in Indonesia, and the positive sympathy from the public helped in pressing the government for its legalisation. It was also found out that GoJek has also helped MSME and in boosting the national economy. In 2018, GoJek, thorough its GoFood service, has recorded an unprecedented 500 million orders. Also, GoJek has been emphasizing on the importance of self-regulation among professional services and co-regulation among industries. Compared to a direct regulation, a co-regulatory approach is more effective and flexible and offers better chances of protecting the welfare of the consumers as it employs a dialogue process between stakeholders where the results deviate from the common state command-and-control regulation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acquier, A., Daudigeos, T., Pinkse, J.: Promises and paradoxes of the sharing economy: an organizing framework. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 125, 1–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.07.006
Arcidiacono, D., Gandini, A., Pais, I.: Sharing what? the ‘sharing economy’ in the sociological debate. Sociol. Rev. 66(2), 275–288 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026118758529
Avital, M., Carroll, J.M., Hjalmarsson, A., Levina, N., Malhotra, A., Sundararajan, A.: The sharing economy: friend or foe? In: 2015 International Conference on Information Systems: Exploring the Information Frontier, ICIS 2015, pp. 1–8 (2015)
Böcker, L., Meelen, T.: Sharing for people, planet or profit? analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environ. Innovation Societal Trans. 23, 28–39 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.004
Bradley, K., Pargman, D.: The sharing economy as the commons of the 21st century. Cambridge J. Reg. Econ. Soc. 10(2), 231–247 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsx001
Breidbach, C.F., Brodie, R.J.: Engagement platforms in the sharing economy: conceptual foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Theory Pract. 27(4), 761–777 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTP-04-2016-0071
Cherry, C.E., Pidgeon, N.F.: Is sharing the solution? exploring public acceptability of the sharing economy. J. Cleaner Prod. 195, 939–948 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.278
Codagnone, C., Biagi, F., Abadie, F.: The passions and the interests: unpacking the “sharing economy”. SSRN Electron. J. (2017). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2793901
Constantiou, I., Marton, A., Tuunainen, V.K.: Four models of sharing economy platforms. MIS Q. Executive 16(4), 236–251 (2017)
Daunorienė, A., Drakšaitė, A., Snieška, V., Valodkienė, G.: Evaluating sustainability of sharing economy business models. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 213, 836–841 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.486
Diaz Olvera, L., Plat, D., Pochet, P.: Looking for the obvious: motorcycle taxi services in Sub-Saharan African cities. J. Transp. Geogr., 102476 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102476
Fraiberger, S.P., Sundararajan, A.: Peer-to-peer rental markets in the sharing economy. SSRN Electron. J., 1–39 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2574337
Frenken, K.: Sustainability perspectives on the sharing economy. Environ. Innovation Societal Trans. 23(May), 1–2 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.04.004
Frenken, K., Schor, J.: Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environ. Innovation Societal Trans. 23, 3–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003
Ge, W., Shao, D., Xue, M., Zhu, H., Cheng, J.: Urban taxi ridership analysis in the emerging metropolis: case study in Shanghai. Transp. Res. Procedia 25, 4916–4927 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2017.05.368
Gerber, P., Caruso, G., Cornelis, E., de Chardon, C.M.: A multi-scale fine-grained LUTI model to simulate land-use scenarios in Luxembourg. J. Transp. Land Use 11(1), 255–272 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2018.1187
Government Regulation Number 74/2014: Road Traffic and Transportation (2014)
Holbrook, M.B., Schindler, R.M.: Nostalgic bonding: exploring the role of nostalgia in the consumption experience. J. Consum. Behav. 3, 107–127 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.127
Hu, B., Xia, X., Sun, H., Dong, X.: Understanding the imbalance of the taxi market: from the high-quality customer’s perspective. Physica A Stat. Mech. Appl. 535, 122297 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122297
Imandasari, T., Sadewo, M.G., Windarto, A.P., Wanto, A., Lingga Wijaya, H.O., Kurniawan, R.: Analysis of the selection factor of online transportation in the VIKOR Method in Pematangsiantar City. J. Phys: Conf. Ser. 1255(1) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1255/1/012008
Jesse, R.: Teacher quality policy when supply matters. Am. Econ. Rev. 105(1), 100–130 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20121242
Law No. 22/2009: Road Traffic and Transportation (2009)
Lazar, J., Barbosa, S.D.J.: Introduction to human-computer interaction. In: Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3298804
Lee, D.: How ojek became gojek: disruptive technologies and the infrastructure of urban citizenship in Indonesia. Int. J. Urban Reg. Res. 1(1) (2018)
Li, J., Hou, L.: A reflection on the taxi reform in China: innovation vs tradition. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 35(3), 251–262 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2019.02.005
Liu, Q., Ding, C., Chen, P.: A panel analysis of the effect of the urban environment on the spatiotemporal pattern of taxi demand. Travel Behav. Soc. 18, 29–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.09.003
Long, J., Szeto, W.Y., Du, J., Wong, R.C.P.: A dynamic taxi traffic assignment model: a two-level continuum transportation system approach. Transp. Res. Part B Methodological 100, 222–254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.02.005
Pazaitis, A., De Filippi, P., Kostakis, V.: Blockchain and value systems in the sharing economy: the illustrative case of backfeed. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 125, 105–115 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.025
Purnawan, P., Musliadi, M.: The potential of problems on operational go-jek and grab bike. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 1402(2) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022026
Rachman, H.O., Chotib, Kurniawan, K.R.: Impact of online taxi bikes presence on Margonda Street, Depok. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 436, 012007 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/436/1/012007
Saffan, A.F., Rizki, M.: Exploring the role of online “Ojek” in public transport trips: case of Jakarta metropolitan area rail users. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 158(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/158/1/012024
Salanova Grau, J.M., Estrada, M., Tzenos, P., Aifandopoulou, G.: Agent-based simulation framework for the taxi sector modeling. Procedia Comput. Sci. 130, 294–301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.042
Scholz, T.: Platform cooperatism: challenging the corporate sharing economy. Rosa Luxemburg Stiftung, New Your Office (Magazine Article), pp. 1–26 (2016)
Silalahi, S.L.B., Handayani, P.W., Munajat, Q.: Service quality analysis for online transportation services: case study of GO-JEK. Procedia Comput. Sci. 124, 487–495 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.12.181
Suatmadi, A.Y., Creutzig, F., Otto, I.M.: On-demand motorcycle taxis improve mobility, not sustainability. Case Stud. Transp. Policy 7(2), 218–229 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.04.005
Suhartoyo, S., Sonhaji, S., Azhar, M., Suharso, P.: Legal aspects of PT. Gojek Indonesia in the partnership agreement dealing with the public transport standards. In: E3S Web of Conferences, vol. 68, pp. 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20186802008
Transportation Ministerial Decree No. 108/2017: Provisions under this decree legalises mobile-based taxis as a form of public transportation (2017)
Transportation Ministerial Decree No. 26/2017: Operation of People with Transport Vehicles not in General Motor Route (2017)
Transportation Ministerial Decree No. 32 of 2016: Transparent Legal Umbrella Taxi Application (2016)
Tucker, E.: Uber and the unmaking and remaking of taxi capitalisms: law and the “sharing economy”, pp. 357–392 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv5vdczv.15
UM.3012/1/21/Phb/2015: Notification Letter Number UM.3012/1/21/Phb/2015 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Ethics declarations
https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/10/23/. Publish: 23/10/2019. Akses: 17/03/2020
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Malawani, A.D., Salahudin, S., Qodir, Z., Loilatu, M.J., Nurmandi, A. (2020). The Evolution of “GOJEK” as an Indonesian Urban Mobile Ride Hailing Model Study Case: Public and Government Regulatory Responses on Urban Mobile Ride Hailing. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds) HCI International 2020 - Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1226. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_56
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50732-9_56
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50731-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50732-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)