Skip to main content

Towards Iteration by Design: An Interaction Design Concept for Safety Critical Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Instructional Systems (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12214))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Requirements of human-machine systems change over long product lifecycles. Anticipating those changes during the initial design is challenging. Once deployed the changing requirements demands a systematic evaluation of the human-machine system, otherwise inefficiencies and accidents can happen. The interaction design concept Iteration by Design introduces a fifth design phase to the user-centred design process of the ISO 9241-210 norm to close the open evaluation loop of safety critical systems with long lifecycles. The implications of Iteration by Design are discussed in the context of resilience engineering. A higher order adaptation regulation loop copes with the complexity of the human-machine system interaction design. The resilience principles drift reaction and human in the loop are utilized to adapt the system to the changing requirements. A design assistance system is proposed to inform a design team about required changes. Finally, adaptive instructional training could be interwoven with the design assistance system to sustain the adaptability of the human-machine system. The value of Iteration by Design as an extension for user-centred design is illustrated by the accident of the USS John S. McCain from 2017.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Transportation Safety Board: Collision between US Navy Destroyer John S McCain and Tanker Alnic MC., Washington, DC, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Eckstein, M.: Navy Reverting DDGs Back to Physical Throttles, After Fleet Rejects Touchscreen Controls. https://news.usni.org/2019/08/09/navy-reverting-ddgs-back-to-physical-throttles-after-fleet-rejects-touchscreen-controls

  3. Tuyls, K., Weiss, G.: Multiagent learning: basics, challenges, and prospects. AI Mag. 33, 41–52 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bainbridge, L.: Ironies of automation. Automatica 19, 775–779 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-1098(83)90046-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rasmussen, J.: Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem. Saf. Sci. 27, 183–213 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-7535(97)00052-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hollnagel, E.: FRAM: The Functional Resonance Analysis Method Modelling Complex Socio-Technical Systems. Ashgate Publishing, Surrey, England (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hollnagel, E.: Coping with complexity: past, present and future. Cogn. Technol. Work 14, 199–205 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-011-0202-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. ISO: Ergonomic design of control centres—Part 1: Principles for the design of control centres (ISO 11064-1), (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. ISO: Ergonomics of human-system interaction—Part 210: Human-centred design forinteractive systems (ISO 9241-210). http://www.iso.org/iso/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=52075, (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0dt90114h

  10. Kontogiannis, T., Hollnagel, E.: Application of cognitive ergonomics to the control room design of advanced technologies. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 3, 243–268 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Algera, J.A., Koopman, P.L., Vijlbrief, H.P.J.: Management strategies in introducing computer-based information systems. Appl. Psychol. 38, 87–103 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.1989.tb01376.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bainbridge, L.: Multiplexed VDT display systems: a framework for good practice. In: Weir, G.R.S., Alty, J.L. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction and Complex Systems. Academic Press, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hollnagel, E., Woods, D.D.: Cognitive systems engineering: new wine in new bottles. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 51, 339–356 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1982.0313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Guastello, S.J.: Human Factors Engineering and Ergonomics: A Systems Approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013). https://doi.org/10.1201/b16191

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Nitsch, V.: Haptic Human-Machine Interaction in Teleoperation Systems and its Implications for the Design and Effective Use of Haptic Interfaces. Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften, Saarbrücken, Germany (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Woods, D.D., Hollnagel, E.: Joint Cognitive Systems: Patterns in Cognitive Systems Engineering. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140130701223774

    Book  Google Scholar 

  17. Ivergard, T., Hunt, B.: Handbook of Control Room Design and Ergonomics: A Perspective for the Future. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2008)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Egan, D.: Individual differences in human-computer interaction. In: Helander, M. (ed.) Handbook of Human Computer Interaction, pp. 543–568. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam (1988)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Schmettow, M., Havinga, J.: Are users more diverse than designs? Testing and extending a 25 years old claim. In: Proceedings of BCS HCI 2013- Internet Things XXVII (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cook, R.I., Woods, D.D.: Adapting to new technology in the operating room. Hum. Factors J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 38, 593–613 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778827224

  21. Woods, D.D.: Four concepts for resilience and the implications for the future of resilience engineering. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 141, 5–9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2015.03.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Woods, D.D.: The theory of graceful extensibility: basic rules that govern adaptive systems. Environ. Syst. Decis. 38(4), 433–457 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10669-018-9708-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashby, W.R.: An Introduction to Cybernetics. Chapman & Hall Ltd, London (1961)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Jackson, S., Ferris, T.L.J.: Resilience principles for engineered systems. Syst. Eng. 16, 152–164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.21228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Schwarz, J., Fuchs, S.: Multidimensional real-time assessment of user state and performance to trigger dynamic system adaptation. In: Schmorrow, D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M. (eds.) AC 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10284, pp. 383–398. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58628-1_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee, J., Park, O.: Adaptive instructional systems. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, pp. 651–660. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Murray, T., Arroyo, I.: Toward measuring and maintaining the zone of proximal development in adaptive instructional systems. In: Cerri, S.A., Gouardères, G., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2002. LNCS, vol. 2363, pp. 749–758. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-47987-2_75

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Kenny, A.J.: The homunculus fallacy. In: Grene, M., Prigogine, I. (eds.) Interpretations of Life and Mind: Essays Around the Problem of Reduction, pp. 155–165. Humanities Press, New York (1971)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas E. F. Witte .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Witte, T.E.F., Hasbach, J., Schwarz, J., Nitsch, V. (2020). Towards Iteration by Design: An Interaction Design Concept for Safety Critical Systems. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50787-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50788-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics