Skip to main content

Adapting Instruction by Measuring Engagement with Machine Learning in Virtual Reality Training

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Adaptive Instructional Systems (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12214))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The USAF has established a new approach to Specialized Undergraduate Pilot Training (SUPT) called Pilot Training Next (PTN) that integrates traditional flying sorties with VR-enabled ground-based training devices and data-driven proficiency tracking to achieve training efficiencies, improve readiness, and increase throughput. Eduworks and USC’s Institute for Creative Technologies are developing machine learning (ML) models that can measure user engagement during any computer-mediated training (simulation, courseware) and offer recommendations for restoring lapses in engagement. We are currently developing and testing this approach, called the Observational Motivation and Engagement Generalized Appliance (OMEGA) in a PTN context. Two factors motivate this work. First, one goal of PTN is for an instructor pilot (IP) to simultaneously monitor multiple simulator rides. Being alerted to distraction, attention and engagement can help an IP manage multiple students at the same time, with recommendations for restoring engagement providing further instructional support. Second, the virtual environment provides a rich source of raw data that machine learning models can use to associate user activity with user engagement. We have created a testbed for data capture in order to construct the ML models, based on theoretical foundations we developed previously. We are running pilots through multiple PTN scenarios and collecting formative data from instructors to evaluate the utility of the recommendations OMEGA generates regarding how lapsed engagement can be restored. We anticipate findings that validate the use of ML models for learning to detect engagement from the rich data sources characteristic of virtual environments. These findings will be applicable across a broad range of conventional and VR training applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hu, P.J.H., Hui, W.: Examining the role of learning engagement in technology-mediated learning and its effects on learning effectiveness and satisfaction. Decis. Support Syst. 53(4), 782–792 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chi, M.T., Wylie, R.: The ICAP framework: linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educ. Psychol. 49(4), 219–243 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Core, M.G., Georgila, K., Nye, B.D., Auerbach, D., Liu, Z.F., DiNinni, R.: Learning, adaptive support, student traits, and engagement in scenario-based learning. In: I/ITSEC, 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Porter, L.W., Lawler, E.E.: Managerial attitudes and performance (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gawel, J.E.: Herzberg’s theory of motivation and Maslow’s hierarchy of needs. Pract. Assess. Res. Eval. 5(11), 3 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pintrich, P.R.: Multiple goals, multiple pathways: the role of goal orientation in learning & achievement. J. Educ. Psychol. 92(3), 544 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learn. Instruct. 22(2), 145–157 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, R.S., Corbett, A.T., Roll, I., Koedinger, K.R.: Developing a generalizable detector of when students game the system. User Model. User-Adap. Interact. 18(3), 287–314 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bell, B., Kelsey, E., Nye, B.: Monitoring engagement and motivation across learning environments. In: Proceedings of the 2019 MODSIM World Conference, Norfolk, VA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harrivel, A.R., et al.: Prediction of cognitive states during flight simulation using multimodal psychophysiological sensing. In: AIAA Information Systems-AIAA Infotech, p. 1135 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wickens, C.D.: Attentional tunneling and task management. In: 2005 International Symposium on Aviation Psychology, p. 812 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cummings, M.L., Mastracchio, C., Thornburg, K.M., Mkrtchyan, A.: Boredom and distraction in multiple unmanned vehicle supervisory control. Interact. Comput. 25(1), 34–47 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Casner, S.M., Schooler, J.W.: Vigilance impossible: diligence, distraction, and daydreaming all lead to failures in a practical monitoring task. Conscious. Cogn. 35, 33–41 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kloft, M., Stiehler, F., Zheng, Z., Pinkwart, N.: Predicting MOOC dropout over weeks using machine learning methods. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2014 Workshop on Analysis of Large Scale Social Interaction in MOOCs, pp. 60–65 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Al-Shabandar, R., Hussain, A.J., Liatsis, P., Keight, R.: Analyzing learners behavior in MOOCs: an examination of performance and motivation using a data-driven approach. IEEE Access 6, 73669–73685 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Piech, C., et al.: Deep knowledge tracing. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 505–513 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bell, B., Kelsey, E., Nye, B., Bennett, W.(. (2020). Adapting Instruction by Measuring Engagement with Machine Learning in Virtual Reality Training. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50787-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50788-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics