Abstract
Students often use flashcards to study but they do not always use them effectively. In this experiment, we explored different methods of dropping flashcards to inform the development of an adaptive flashcard-based trainer. Forty-seven U.S. Marine Corps students were randomly assigned to one of three groups in an armored vehicle training task. In the Mastery Drop condition, cards were dropped from training based on objective criteria (i.e., accuracy and reaction time). In the Learner Drop condition, cards were dropped based on the learner’s choice. In the No Drop condition, cards were not dropped during training, which served as a control group. Using a pre-test post-test design, results showed that the Learner Drop condition had the lowest learning gains on the immediate post-test and the delayed post-test (two days after training), perhaps because participants were unsuccessful at self-regulating their learning and completed training too quickly. Although the No Drop condition had the highest learning gains on the immediate post-test, the gains significantly decreased on the delayed post-test. In contrast, the Mastery Drop condition maintained consistent learning gains from immediate to delayed post-test. Although the No Drop condition completed more training trials than the Mastery Drop condition, this additional practice did not significantly aid long-term retention. Finally, the No Drop condition had the highest immediate transfer test scores, which involved identifying images of real-world vehicles, but there were no group differences on the delayed transfer test. These results suggest that adaptive flashcard training should incorporate mastery criteria, rather than learner-driven decisions about when to drop flashcards from the deck.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Burke, R.P.: (2018). https://www.usni.org/magazines/proceedings/2018/march/sailor-2025-navys-strategy-people
Landsberg, C.R., Van Buskirk, W.L., Astwood, R.S., Mercado, A.D., Aakre, A.J.: Adaptive training considerations for simulation-based training. Special report No 2010-001, NAWCTSD. Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division, Orlando (2011)
Kornell, N., Bjork, R.A.: Optimising self-regulated study: the benefits—and costs—of dropping flashcards. Memory 16, 125–136 (2008)
Karpicke, J.D., Roediger, H.L.: The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science 319(5865), 966–968 (2008)
Oxford, R., Crookall, D.: Vocabulary learning: a critical analysis of techniques. TESL Canada J. 7, 9–30 (1990)
Oxford, R.L., Scarcella, R.C.: Second language vocabulary learning among adults: state of the art in vocabulary instruction. System 22(2), 231–243 (1994)
Wissman, K.T., Rawson, K.A., Pyc, M.A.: How and when do students use flashcards? Memory 20(6), 568–579 (2012)
Bjork, R.A., Dunlosky, J., Kornell, N.: Self-regulated learning: beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 417–444 (2013)
Karpicke, J.D., Butler, A.C., Roediger, H.L.: Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory 17, 471–479 (2009)
Pyc, M.A., Rawson, K.A., Aschenbrenner, A.J.: Metacognitive monitoring during criterion learning: when and why are judgments accurate? Mem. Cogn. 42(6), 886–897 (2014). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0403-4
Scheiter, K., Gerjets, P.: Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 19(3), 285–307 (2007)
Dunlosky, J., Serra, M., Baker, J.M.C.: Metamemory applied. In: Durso, F.T., Nickerson, R.S., Dumais, S.T., Lewandowsky, S., Perfect, T.J. (eds.) Handbook of Applied Cognition, 2nd edn, pp. 137–159. Wiley, New York (2007)
Nelson, T.O., Narens, L.: Metamemory: a theoretical framework and new findings. In: Bower, G.H. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 26, pp. 125–173. Academic Press, New York (1990)
Karpicke, J.D.: Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding when to practice retriecal during learning. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 1238(4), 469–486 (2009)
Marraffino, M.D., Johnson, C.I., Whitmer, D.E., Steinhauser, N.B., Clement, A.: Advise when ready for game plan: adaptive training for JTACs. In: Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation & Education Conference (I/ITSEC). National Training Systems Association, Orlando (2019)
Peirce, N., Wade, V.: Personalised learning for casual games: the ‘language trap’ online language learning game. In: Leading Issues in Games Based Learning, vol. 159–170 (2010)
VanLehn, K., et al.: The Andes physics tutoring system: lessons learned. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Educ. 15(3), 147–204 (2005)
Landsberg, C.R., Mercado, A.D., Van Buskirk, W.L., Lineberry, M., Steinhauser, N.: Evaluation of an adaptive training system for submarine periscope operations. In: 56th International Proceedings on Human Factors and Ergonomics, vol. 56(1), pp. 2422–2426. SAGE Publications, Los Angeles (2012)
Durlach, P.J., Ray, J.M.: Designing adaptive instructional environments: insights from empirical evidence. Technical report No. 1297, ARI. U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, Arlington (2011)
Andrieux, M., Danna, J., Thon, B.: Self-control of task difficulty during training enhances motor learning of a complex coincidence-anticipation task. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 83(1), 27–35 (2012)
Durlach, P.J.: Fundamentals, flavors, and foibles of adaptive instructional systems. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11597, pp. 76–95. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22341-0_7
Guadagnoli, M.A., Lee, T.D.: Challenge point: a framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. J. Mot. Behav. 36(2), 212–224 (2004)
Lintern, G., Gopher, D.: Adaptive training of perceptual-motor skills: issues, results, and future directions. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 10(5), 521–551 (1978)
Mayer, R.E.: Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, New York (2014)
Sweller, J.: Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In: Mayer, R.E. (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning, 1st edn, pp. 19–30. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Vygotsky, L.S.: Interaction between learning and development. In: Gauvain, M., Cole, M. (eds.) Readings on the Development of Children, 4th edn, pp. 34–40. Worth, New York (2005)
Roediger, H.L., Karpicke, J.D.: Test-enhanced learning: taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol. Sci. 17(3), 249–255 (2006)
Mettler, E., Massey, C.M., Kellman, P.J.: Improving adaptive learning technology through the use of response times. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 2532–2537. Cognitive Sciences Society, Boston (2011)
Mettler, E., Massey, C.M., Kellman, P.J.: A comparison of adaptive and fixed schedules of practice. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 145(7), 897–917 (2016)
van Merriënboer, J.J., Sweller, J.: Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 17(2), 147–177 (2005)
Atkinson, R.C.: Optimizing the learning of a second-language vocabulary. J. Exp. Psychol. 96(1), 124–129 (1972)
Settles, B., Meeder, B.: A trainable spaced repetition model for language learning. In: Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1848–1858. Association for Computational Linguistics, Germany (2016)
Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge Dr. Peter Squire and the Office of Naval Research who sponsored this work (Funding Doc# N0001419WX00633). We would also like to thank the Marine Corps Intelligence School for their enthusiastic support and help with participant recruitment. Presentation of this material does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. Navy or Department of Defense (DoD). The opinions of the authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the U.S. Navy or DoD.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Whitmer, D.E., Johnson, C.I., Marraffino, M.D., Pharmer, R.L., Blalock, L.D. (2020). A Mastery Approach to Flashcard-Based Adaptive Training. In: Sottilare, R.A., Schwarz, J. (eds) Adaptive Instructional Systems. HCII 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12214. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_41
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_41
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50787-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50788-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)