Skip to main content

User Preference and Comparative Workflow Evaluation of a Next Generation Vital Signs Monitor Designed for a Low Acuity Setting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1205))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 990 Accesses

Abstract

Multiparametric automated vital sign monitors are slowly becoming the standard in outpatient practice settings where users value solutions that provide efficiency and simplify their clinical workflows. In order to evaluate whether our new to market device would meet expectations and requirements of device design we designed a study to look at the use of our new device in these settings and thereby quantify usability, preference and acceptance by clinicians.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Klueber, S., Wolf, E., Grundgeiger, T., Brecknell, B., Mohamed, I., Sanderson, P.: Supporting multiple patient monitoring with head-worn displays and spearcons. Appl. Ergon. 2019(78), 86–96 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruppar, D.: Analysis of the U.S. Multiparameter Patient Monitoring Equipment Market Emerging from Market Saturation, March (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Frost & Sullivan: Global Hospital-based Medical Device Connectivity Market, Forecast to 2022, 1–18 April (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brooke, J.: A quick and dirty usability scale. Usability Eval. Ind. 189(194), 4–7 (1996). https://cui.unige.ch/isi/icle-wiki/_media/ipm:test-suschapt.pdf

  5. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P., Warshaw, P.R.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 1111–1132 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pande, T., Saravu, K., Temesgen, Z., et al.: Evaluating clinicians’ user experience and acceptability of LearnTB, a smartphone application for tuberculosis in India. Mhealth 2017; 3:30. https://doi.org/10.21037/mhealth.2017.07.01. Published 27 July 2017

  7. Gagnon, M.P., Ngangue, P., Payne-Gagnon, J., et al.: m-Health adoption by healthcare professionals: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 23(1), 212–220 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shruti Marwaha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Marwaha, S., Long, C., John, T.T., Koloms, K. (2020). User Preference and Comparative Workflow Evaluation of a Next Generation Vital Signs Monitor Designed for a Low Acuity Setting. In: Kalra, J., Lightner, N. (eds) Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics in Healthcare and Medical Devices. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1205. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50838-8_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50838-8_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50837-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50838-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics