Abstract
The integration of crew resource management into the product design process for aerospace systems is discussed. Human-centered design methods - which can include human in the loop simulations, rapid prototyping, problem definition, evaluations, and verifications - often rely on operational knowledge of expert users to address human-systems integration needs. Modern integration efforts attempt to reduce the divide between user intentions and system state allowing for a safer system operation. However, in a multi-crew environment, crew interactions ought to be heavily taken into consideration. For this reason, crew resource management is recommended as a training supplement to both aerospace designers/researchers and expert users.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Sumwalt, R.L., Landsberg, B., Homendy, J.: Assumptions used in the safety assessment process and the effects of multiple alerts and indications on pilot performance. Safety recommendation report, National Transportation Safety Board. Washington, D.C. (2019)
Moak, L., McDew, D.W., Haskins, G., Hylander, K., Grizzle, D.: Official report of the special committee to review the federal aviation administration’s aircraft certification process. Official report, Department of Transportation. Washington, D.C. (2020)
Leifer, L., Meinel, C., Plattner, H.: Design Thinking: Understand - Improve - Apply. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Bernard, T., Stephane, L.: Human-systems integration methods in flight test: a consolidated framework for sociotechnical modeling during critical phases of flight in general aviation. In: Society of Flight Test Engineers 48th Annual Symposium (2017)
Bernard, T., Stephane, L., Boy, G.A.: Autonomous stall recovery dynamics as a prevention tool for general aviation loss of control. In: Stanton, N.A. (ed.) International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics 2017, vol. 597, pp. 38–47. Springer, Heidelberg (2017)
Andre, A.D., Wickens, C.D.: Information processing and perceptual characteristics of display design: the role of emergent features and objects. Technical memorandum, United States Army Human Engineering Laboratory (1990)
Federal Aviation Administration: Crew Resource Management Training. Advisory Circular 120-51E. Washington, D.C. (2004)
Hutchins, E., Klausen, T.: Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit. In: Engestrom, Y., Middleton, D. (eds.) Cognition and Communication at Work, pp. 15–34. Cambridge University Press, New York (1996)
Stolzer, A.J., Halford, C.D., Goglia, J.J.: Safety management systems in aviation. Ashgate, Burlington (2008)
National Transportation Safety Board: Aviation Incident Final Report CEN11IA615. Washington, D.C. (2014)
National Transportation Safety Board: Aviation Incident Final Report ERA11IA316. Washington, D.C. (2012)
NetJets Association of Shared Aircraft Pilots [NJASAP]: Party submission of NJASAP to the NTSB 749QS Stewart-Newburgh, New York, ERA11IA316, National Transportation Safety Board Public Docket (2012)
Gulfstream Aerospace: G550 outfitting check flight accident: Gulfstream party submission, CEN11FA193, National Transportation Safety Board Public Docket (2013)
Pakistan Civil Aviation Authority [PCAA-SIB]: Investigation Report: Air Blue flight AQB-2020 A-321 Reg AP-BJB Pakistan crashed on 28 July 2010 at Margalla Hills, Islamabad. Pakistan (2011)
Federal Aviation Administration.: Flightcrew Member Line Operational Simulations: Line-Oriented Flight Training, Special Purpose Operational Training, Line Operational Evaluation. Advisory Circular 120-35D. Washington, D.C. (2015)
Merritt, A., Klinect, J.: Defensive Flying for Pilots: An Introduction to Threat and Error Management. The University of Texas Human Factors Research Project (2006)
Stephane, L.: User behavior patterns: gathering, analysis, simulation and prediction. In: Kurosu, M. (ed.) Human Centered Design. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 322–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Stephane, L.: Visual patterns in civil aircraft cockpits. In: Proceedings of Human Computer Interaction Aero, Seattle, pp. 20–22 (2006)
Stephane, L.: Eye tracking from a human factors perspective. In: Boy, G.A. (ed.) The Handbook of Human-Machine Interaction: A Human-Centered Design Approach, pp. 339–364. Ashgate, Burlington (2012)
Hildebrandt, M., Langstrand, J.P., Nguyen, H.T.: Synopticon: a real-time data fusion platform for behavioral research. In: AutomotiveUI 2019: 11th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Utrecht, Netherlands, pp. 494–497 (2019)
Plattner, H., Leifer, L., Meinel, C.: Design Thinking Research: Building Innovators. Springer, Cham (2015)
Boulnois, S., Stephane, L.: Human-centered design of a 3D-augmented strategic weather management system: first design loops. In: Congress of the International Ergonomics Association, pp. 555–575. Springer, Cham (2018)
Acknowledgements
Disclaimer: Any views, opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this document are the authors’ and do not necessarily reflect the views of Garmin International, Round Feather, or the Institutt for Energiteknikk.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bernard, T., Tuccio, W.A., Boulnois, S., Tasic, A., Stephane, L. (2020). An Approach to Aerospace Design Integrating Crew Resource Management in Operational Environments. In: Stanton, N. (eds) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50943-9_69
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50942-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50943-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)