Skip to main content

Modularity and Grids in Letterforms Across Calligraphy, Conventional Type and Geometric Type Teaching

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Ergonomics in Design (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1203))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper deconstructs the inherent modular nature of the Latin alphabet, more specifically its structure and anatomy. Letterforms are often rendered into grids and occasionally through the usage of geometric shapes and/or other reusable shapes, a practice which has been useful for either letterform design teaching purposes or actual longform text setting by calligraphic methods.

We propose a theoretical approach, with a non-interventionist methodology of qualitative research, through literary review in which we evaluate the state of the art. Authors across the academic and historic spectrum are reviewed: ranging from the humanistic Dürer – with his Underweysung der Messung treatise – to the mathematically-inclined Hofstadter – with his Letter Spirit project –, but also including specialists such as Johnston, Gill, Tschichold, Albers, Schrofer, Crouwel, Noordzij, Briem, Frutiger and Knuth – with their extensive theoretical treatises supported by constant professional practice. Our main objective is that an integrated understanding of the multiple systems of typographic modularity will become a valuable theoretical framework for teaching graduate and post-graduate graphic design, graphic communication and type design courses. Modular and geometric type design practice, applied in practical teaching/learning exercises, can structure the students’ view and understanding of the alphabet as a visual code of communication, allowing for an improved process and, therefore, improved results. We conclude that teaching a modular theoretical view, in conjunction with practical exercises, structures students’ understanding of typography beyond traditional modular typography, as well as the composing elements of both calligraphy and conventional type design. This method makes the process of learning and understanding typographic anatomy easier, a factor which allows for improved courses in type design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Frutiger, A.: Signs and Symbols: Their Design and Meaning. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gamonal-Arroyo, R.: The construction of the letter: stencils as a creative and didactic tool. In: Moreira, L. and Sanches, M. (eds.) 9th Typography Meeting/9.o Encontro de Tipografia, pp. 298–309. ATIPO – Associação de Tipografia de Portugal, Tomar (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schrofer, J.W.: Letters op Maat. Lecturis, Eindhoven (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Huygen, F.: Jurriaan Schrofer – Graphic Designer, Pioneer of Photobooks, Art Director, Teacher, Art Manager, Environmental Artist. Valiz, Amsterdam (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Knuth, D.E.: Mathematical typography. Bull. New Ser. Am. Math. Soc. 1, 337–372 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1090/S0273-0979-1979-14598-1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofstadter, D.R.: Fluid Concepts & Creative Analogies. Basic Books, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. McGraw, G.E.J. (Indiana U. of C.S.): Letter Spirit (part one): Emergent high-level perception of letters using fluid concepts (1995). http://goosie.cogsci.indiana.edu/farg/mcgrawg/thesis.html

  8. Krauss, R.: Grids, vol. 9, pp. 50–64 (1979). https://doi.org/10.2307/778321

  9. Williamson, J.H.: The grid: history, use and meaning. Des. Issues 3, 15–30 (1986). https://doi.org/10.2307/1511481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Morison, S.: Politics and Script: Aspects of Authority and Freedom in the Development of Graeco-Latin Script from the Sixth Century B.C. to the Twentieth Century A.D. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Arrighi, L.V.d.: La Operina di Ludovico Vicentino, da imparare di scrivere littera Cancellarescha. Operina (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Almeida, C.M.: Origem e Evolução do Itálico: Da Caligrafia à Tipografia (2017). http://hdl.handle.net/10400.5/15300

  13. Brandão, J.A., Almeida, C.M.: The Italic style: understanding the shape through history. In: Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 955, pp. 597–608 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20227-9_56

  14. Morison, S.: Pacioli’s Classic Roman Alphabet. Dover Publications, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Barchowsky, N.J., Briem, G.S.E.: Cursive Italic News: The Barchowsky Report on Handwriting (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tagliente, G.A.: Lo presente libro insegna la vera arte dello excellente scrivere de diverse varie sorte de litere. Giovanni Antonio di Nicolini da Sabio e i fratelli, Venezia (1544)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Palatino, G.: Libro di M. Giovanbattista Palatino, cittadino romano, nelqual s’insegna…. Antonio Maria Guidotto Mantovano, & Duodecimo Viotto Parmesano socio, Roma (1556)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pacioli, L.: Divina proportione: Opera a tutti glingegni perspicaci e curiosi necessaria Ove ciascun studioso di Philosophia: Prospettiva…. Paganinum de Paganinis, Venezia (1509)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fanti, S.: Theorica et pratica … de modo scribendi fabricandique omnes litterarum species. Giovanni Rossi, Venezia (1514)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dürer, A.: Underweysung der Messung, mit dem Zirckel und Richtscheyt, in Linien ebnen unnd gantzen Corporen. Hieronymus Andreae, Nürnberg (1525). https://doi.org/10.3931/e-rara-9108

  21. Tory, G.: Champ fleury, Au quel est contenu Lart et Science…. Ce livre est privilegie pour dix ans par le Roy nostre sire et est a vendre a Paris sus Petit Pont a…, Paris (1529)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gray, N.: A History of Lettering. Phaidon, Oxford (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Kinross, R.: Modern Typography: An Essay in Critical History. Hyphen Press, London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gomes, J.F.R.: Tipografia Modular: Bases Teóricas para o Desenho de Letra (2019). http://hdl.handle.net/10451/38919. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34916.94082

  25. Roworth, P.: Foreword. In: Child, H. (ed.) Formal Penmanship and Other Papers, pp. 9–12. Lund Humphries, London (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Johnston, E.: Writing & Illuminating & Lettering. Macmillan, New York (1906)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  27. Johnston, E.: Formal Penmanship and Other Papers. Lund Humphries, London (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gill, E.: An Essay on Typography. Sheed and Ward, London (1936)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Burke, C.: Active literature: Jan Tschichold and New Typography. Hyphen Press, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Pool, A.: FF DIN Round: digital block letters (2010). https://web.archive.org/web/20171203013830/https://www.fontfont.com/staticcontent/downloads/FF_DIN_Round_Digital_Block_Letters.pdf?1308319796

  31. Hidden Treasures of Creativity | Adobe. https://adobehiddentreasures.com

  32. Weber, N.F., Redensk, J., Martinez de Guereñu, L., Toledo, M., Witschey, E., Fontán del Junco, M.: Josef Albers: Minimal Means, Maximum Effect. Fundación Juan March, Madrid (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Middendorp, J.: Dutch Type. Druk Editions, Berlin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huygen, F.: Wim Crouwel Modernist. Lecturis, Eindhoven (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Noordzij, G.: Das Kind und die Schrift. Typographische Gesellschaft München, Munich (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Noordzij, G.: Letterletter. Hartley & Marks Publishers, Vancouver (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Noordzij, G.: The Stroke: Theory of Writing. Hyphen Press, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Knuth, D.E.: The letter S. Math. Intell. 2, 114–122 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03023051

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. Brandão, J.A.: Tool and method for emulating flat-tip brush (2016). https://patents.google.com/patent/US9460529

  40. Brandão, J.: Calligraphy practice app, system and tool for learning calligraphy. In: Advances in Communication of Design. AHFE 2017. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 609, pp. 97–103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60477-0_11

  41. Brandão, J.: Calligraphy Practice. https://www.calligraphypractice.com

  42. Gomes, J.: Cappucino. In: Amado, P., Quelhas, V., Pereira, J.B. (eds.) 6.o Encontro de Tipografia/6th Typography Meeting. pp. 381–383. Universidade de Aveiro, Departamento de Comunicação e Arte, Aveiro (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gomes, J.F.R.: Mutsawi Alaidlae. In: Lessa, J. (ed.) Encontro de Tipografia – Livro de Actas/Typography Meeting – Book of Proceedings. pp. 245–247. ATIPO – Associação de Tipografia de Portugal, Faro (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Gomes, J.F.: Pryamougol’nyy. In: Moreira, L., Sanches, M. (eds.) 9th Typography Meeting/9.o Encontro de Tipografia, p. 416. ATIPO – Associação de Tipografia de Portugal, Tomar (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gomes, J.F.R.: Parisienne. In: Azevedo, M., Lemos, J., Dias, R., Meira, S., Vilar, D. (eds.) Encontro de Tipografia\Livro de Resumos/Typography Meeting\Book of Proceedings, p. 34. Esad—Idea, Research in Design and Art, Matosinhos (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Gomes, J.: ModuLetter: physical, reactive and interactive modular typography. In: Moreira, L., Sanches, M. (eds.) 9th Typography Meeting/9.o Encontro de Tipografia, pp. 184–195. ATIPO – Associação de Tipografia de Portugal, Tomar (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to João Brandão or João Gomes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brandão, J., Gomes, J. (2020). Modularity and Grids in Letterforms Across Calligraphy, Conventional Type and Geometric Type Teaching. In: Rebelo, F., Soares, M. (eds) Advances in Ergonomics in Design. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1203. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51038-1_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51038-1_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51037-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51038-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics