Skip to main content

Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Interpretive Nutrition Label Format in Improving Healthy Food Discrimination Using Signal Detection Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering (AHFE 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1201))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a pilot study examining the effectiveness of an interpretive nutrition label as an information nudge in the context of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) with a mobile Health application (mHealth app). Thirty subjects from two age groups were recruited to complete a healthy food discrimination task on the web-based app. The primary factor was the availability of an interpretative front-of-package (FOP) nutrition label or the back-of-package (BOP) Nutrition Facts Panel (NFP) for each choice. Additionally, the number of food options and a default nudge were examined. Results indicate both the potential usefulness of FOP nutrition labels as an information nudge in the mHealth app context and the discriminability metric adopted from Signal Detection Theory for similar experiments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bauer, J.M., Reisch, L.A.: Behavioural insights and (un)healthy dietary choices: a review of current evidence. J. Consum. Policy (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-018-9387-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bleich, S.N., Economos, C.D., Spiker, M.L., Vercammen, K.A., VanEpps, E.M., Block, J.P., Elbel, B., Story, M., Roberto, C.A.: A systematic review of calorie labeling and modified calorie labeling interventions: impact on consumer and restaurant behavior. Obesity 25, 2018–2044 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.21940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Campos, S., Doxey, J., Hammond, D.: Nutrition labels on pre-packaged foods: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr. 14, 1496–1506 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980010003290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Talati, Z., Pettigrew, S., Kelly, B., Ball, K., Dixon, H., Shilton, T.: Consumers’ responses to front-of-pack labels that vary by interpretive content. Appetite 101, 205–213 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. World Health Organization: “Best buys” and other recommended interventions for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases. Updated (2017) appendix 3 of the global action plan for the prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases 2013–2020 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cecchini, M., Warin, L.: Impact of food labelling systems on food choices and eating behaviours: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized studies. Obes. Rev. 17, 201–210 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Egnell, M., Ducrot, P., Touvier, M., Allès, B., Hercberg, S., Kesse-Guyot, E., Julia, C.: Objective understanding of Nutri-Score Front-Of-Package nutrition label according to individual characteristics of subjects: comparisons with other format labels. PLoS ONE 13, e0202095 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0202095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Khandpur, N., Graham, D.J., Roberto, C.A.: Simplifying mental math: changing how added sugars are displayed on the nutrition facts label can improve consumer understanding (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.03.015

  9. Drichoutis, A.C.: Nutrition knowledge and consumer use of nutritional food labels. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 32, 93–118 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbi003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Green, D.M., Swets, J.A.: Signal Detection Theory and Psychophysics. Peninsula Publishing, Los Altos (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  11. McLaughlin, A.C., Whitlock, L.A., Lester, K.L., McGraw, A.E.: Older adults’ self-reported barriers to adherence to dietary guidelines and strategies to overcome them. J. Health Psychol. 22, 356–363 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105315603472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Czaja, S.J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W.A., Fisk, A.D., Mitzner, T., Lee, C.C., Nair, S.: Computer proficiency questionnaire: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. Gerontologist 55, 404–411 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnt117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Weiss, B.D., Mays, M.Z., Martz, W., Castro, K.M., DeWalt, D.A., Pignone, M.P., Mockbee, J., Hale, F.A.: Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann. Fam. Med. 3, 514–522 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results (1985). http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/15192

  15. Lund, A.M.: Measuring usability with the USE questionnaire. Usability Interface 8, 3–6 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087402250360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Macmillan, N.A., Creelman, C.D.: Detection Theory: A User’s Guide, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (2004). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410611147

  17. Longo, L.: Subjective usability, mental workload assessments and their impact on objective human performance. In: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), pp. 202–223. Springer (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67684-5_13

  18. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Malloy-Weir, L., Cooper, M.: Health literacy, literacy, numeracy and nutrition label understanding and use: a scoping review of the literature. J. Hum. Nutr. Diet. 30, 309–325 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burton-Jones, A., Grange, C.: From use to effective use: a representation theory perspective. Inf. Syst. Res. 24, 632–658 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0444

  21. Zapata, B.C., Fernández-Alemán, J.L., Idri, A., Toval, A.: Empirical studies on usability of mHealth apps: a systematic literature review. J. Med. Syst. 39, 1–19 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-014-0182-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was conducted in and supported by Discovery & Learning Research Center, Purdue University and Tippecanoe Senior Center, Lafaytte, Indiana. Authors are grateful for the staffs and those volunteers who have given great support to the recruitment process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zachary Hass .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chao, WY., Lehto, M., Pitts, B., Hass, Z. (2021). Evaluation of the Effectiveness of an Interpretive Nutrition Label Format in Improving Healthy Food Discrimination Using Signal Detection Theory. In: Ayaz, H., Asgher, U. (eds) Advances in Neuroergonomics and Cognitive Engineering. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1201. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51041-1_45

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics