Abstract
A driving simulation study of a manned-unmanned vehicle gunnery team was conducted to assess potential metrics of team trust and cohesion for evaluating future human-autonomy teams. Cadet dyads worked with a veteran commander within a driving simulation to direct a weaponized robotic ground vehicle from a command and control vehicle and identify and engage targets on a gunnery range. Subjective, behavioral, performance, communication, and physiological data were collected to identify possible team trust and team cohesion metrics. Findings suggest that performance, behavior, and physiological data may provide useful windows into the trust and cohesion exhibited by crew members in human-autonomy teams.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Phillips, E., Ososky, S., Grove, J., Jentsch, F.: From tools to teammates: toward the development of appropriate mental models for intelligent robots. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 1491–1495. SAGE Publications, CA (2011)
Chen, J.Y., Procci, K., Boyce, M., Wright, J., Garcia, A., Barnes, M.: Situation awareness-based agent transparency (ARL-TR-6905). US Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD (2014)
Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46, 50–80 (2004)
Schaefer, K.E., Straub, E.R.: Will passengers trust driverless vehicles? Removing the steering wheel and pedals. In: 2016 IEEE International Multi-Disciplinary Conference on Cognitive Methods in Situation Awareness and Decision Support, pp. 159–165. IEEE (2016)
Walker, F., Verwey, W., Martens, M.: Gaze behavior as a measure of trust in automated vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 6th Humanist Conference, pp. 1–6 (2018)
Hergerth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., Krems, J.F.: Keep your scanners peeled: gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Hum. Factors 58(3), 509–519 (2016)
Shahrdar, S., Park, C., Norjoumain, M.: Human trust measurement using an immersive virtual reality autonomous vehicle simulator. In: Proceedings of Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 515–520. AAAI/ACM (2019)
Schaefer, K.E., Brewer, R.W., Perelman, B.S., Ray Pursel, E., Cerame, E., Drnec, K., Paul, V., Haynes, B., Donavanik, D., Gremillion, G., Metcalfe, J.S.: Challenges with developing driving simulation systems for robotic vehicles. In: Cassenti, D. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling, pp. 139–150. Springer (2019)
Schaefer, K.E., Baker, A.L., Brewer, R.W., Patton, D., Canady, J., Metcalfe, J.S.: Assessing multi-agent human-autonomy teams: US army robotic wingman gunnery operations. In: Micro-and Nanotechnology Sensors, Systems, and Applications XI, p. 109822B. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2019)
Baker, A.L., Schaefer, K.E., Hill, S.G.: Teamwork and Communication Methods and Metrics for Human-Autonomy Teaming (ARL-TR-8844). US Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD (2019)
Huang, L., Cooke, N., Gutzwiller, R., Berman, S., Chiou, E., Demir, M., Zhang, W.: Distributed dynamic team trust in human, artificial intelligence, and robot teaming. In: Nam, C., Lyons, J. (eds.) Trust in Human-Robot Interaction: Research and Applications. Elsevier (in press)
Schaefer, K.E., Brewer, R., Pursel, E., Zimmermann, A., Cerame, E., Briggs, K.: Outcomes from the first Wingman software-in-the-loop integration event: January 2017 (ARL-TR-0830). US Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD (2017)
Schaefer, K.E., Brewer, R.W., Pursel, E.R., Zimmermann, A., Cerame, E.: Advancements Made to the Wingman Software-in-the-Loop (SIL) Simulation: How to Operate the SIL (ARL-TR-8254). US Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD (2017)
Schaefer, K.E., Brewer, R.W., Pursel, E.R., Desormeaux, M., Zimmermann, A., Cerame, E.: US Army Robotic Wingman Simulation: June 2018 Integration Workshop (ARL-TR-8572). US Army Research Laboratory, APG, MD (2018)
US Army Training and Doctrine Command: Training and qualification, crew. Training Circular No: TC 3-20.31. Department of the Army (US), Washington (DC), 17 March 2015
Lubin, B., Zuckerman, M.: Manual for the MAACL-R: Multiple Affect Adjective Check List-Revised. Educational and Industrial Testing Service, San Diego, CA (1999)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)
Brewer, R.W., Cerame, E., Pursel, E.R., Zimmerman, A., Schaefer, K.E.: Manned-unmanned teaming: US army robotic wingman vehicles. In: Cassenti D. (ed.) Advances in Human Factors in Simulation and Modeling, pp. 89–100. Springer (2019)
Acknowledgments
The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the CCDC Army Research Laboratory or the US Government. The US Government is authorized to reproduce and distribute reprints for Government purposes notwithstanding any copyright notation herein. We would like to thank Scott Kerick, Jonroy Canady, Catherine Neubauer, Sean Fitzhugh, and Debbie Patton for their support in the study development and analysis.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Milner, A. et al. (2021). Identifying New Team Trust and Team Cohesion Metrics that Support Future Human-Autonomy Teams. In: Cassenti, D., Scataglini, S., Rajulu, S., Wright, J. (eds) Advances in Simulation and Digital Human Modeling. AHFE 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1206. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51064-0_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51064-0_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-51063-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-51064-0
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)