Skip to main content

Using Constructive Alignment to Evaluate Industry 4.0 Competencies in Remote Laboratories for Manufacturing Technology

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Cross Reality and Data Science in Engineering (REV 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1231))

Abstract

Digitalization, smartification and cyber-physical systems are going to reshape the working lives of future engineers. Thus, these developments will have an impact on higher education in the near future. For years, there has been a vivid discussion on the respective competencies students need to develop in order to be able to successfully face these challenges. In this article, the laboratory is presented as a cyber-physical system that can offer a setting to foster these competencies in engineering laboratory courses. We present the remote laboratory as a setting in which future-oriented teaching and learning in the light of required competencies for the ‘working world 4.0’ can take place. In order to identify these competencies and to analyze an existing laboratory, a qualitatively oriented content-analytical procedure is used. In a first step, based on current scientific studies, competencies expected to be shown by future engineers are named and summarized. In a second step, an exemplary existing remote laboratory is analyzed with regard to explicit and implicit learning objectives, which address the identified competency requirements. It can be shown that only a few professional and interdisciplinary competencies in the context of Industry 4.0 are being addressed so far. Based on the focused example, the close connection to engineering fundamentals on the one hand and the lack of interdisciplinarity in the observed learning scenario on the other hand can be identified as critical parameters, which limit the promotion of more future-oriented competencies. This shows possibilities for future research and development in this area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Acatech (ed.): Kompetenzen für die Industrie 4.0: Qualifizierungsbedarfe und Lösungsansätze. München: Utz, Herbert (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Stifterverband, Hochschulbildung für die Arbeitswelt 4.0: Jahresbericht 2016. Edition Stifterverband - Verwaltungsgesellschaft für Wissenschaftspflege mbH, Essen (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Biggs, J., Tang, C.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University: What the Student Does, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill/Society for Research into Higher Education/Open University Press, Maidenhead (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Auer, M.E., Azad, A.K.M., Edwards, A., de Jong, T. (eds.): Cyber-Physical Laboratories in Engineering and Science Education. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76935-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Terkowsky, C., et al.: Developing tele-operated laboratories for manufacturing engineering education platform for e-learning and telemetric experimentation (PeTEX). Int. J. Onl. Eng. 6(5), 60–70 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Terkowsky, C., Pleul, C., Jahnke, I., Tekkaya, A.E.: Tele-operated laboratories for online production engineering education - platform for e-learning and telemetric experimentation (PeTEX). Int. J. Onl. Eng. 7(S1), 37–43 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. European Commission: The european qualifications framework for lifelong learning (EFQ). Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Biggs, J.: Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Rev. High. Educ. I, 5–22 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mayring, P.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken, 12th edn. Beltz, Weinheim (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., May, D.: Online engineering education for manufacturing technology: is a remote experiment a suitable tool to teach competences for “Working 4.0”? Eur. J. Educ. 54(4), 577–590 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., May, D.: Is a remote laboratory a means to develop competences for the ‘working world 4.0’? A brief tentative reality check of learning objectives. In: 2019 5th Experiment International Conference (exp.at’19), Funchal (Madeira Island), Portugal, 2019, pp. 118–122 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., May, D.: Labordidaktik: Kompetenzen für die Arbeitswelt 4.0. In: Haertel, T., Terkowsky, C., Dany, S., Heix, S. (eds.) Hochschullehre & Industrie 4.0: Herausforderungen - Lösungen - Perspektiven, 1st edn., pp. 89–103. wbv Media, Bielefeld (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schlund, S., Pokorni, W.: Industrie 4.0 - Wo steht die Revolution der Arbeitsgestaltung? http://publica.fraunhofer.de/dokumente/N-432393.html. Accessed 01 Sep 2018

  14. Pfeiffer, S., Lee, H., Zirnig, C., Suphan, A.: Industrie 4.0 - Qualifizierung 2025. https://arbeitsmarkt.vdma.org/viewer/-/v2article/render/13668437. Accessed 01 Sep 2018

  15. Hartmann, F.: Zukünftige Anforderungen an Kompetenzen im Zusammenhang mit Industrie 4.0 – Eine Bestandsaufnahme. In: Facharbeit und Digitalisierung, Verbundprojekt Prokom 4.0, pp. 19–28 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. AK DQR: Deutscher Qualifikationsrahmen für lebenslanges Lernen. https://www.dqr.de/media/content/Der_Deutsche_Qualifikationsrahmen_fue_lebenslanges_Lernen.pdf. Accessed 01 Sep 2018

  17. Pleul, C.: Das Labor als Lehr-Lern-Umgebung in der Umformtechnik: Entwicklungsstrategie und hochschuldidaktisches Modell, 1st edn. Shaker, Aachen (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Terkowsky, C., May, D., Haertel, T., Pleul, C.: Integrating remote labs into personal learning environments - experiential learning with tele-operated experiments and e-portfolios. Int. J. Onl. Eng. 9(1), 12–20 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Terkowsky, C., Haertel, T., Bielski, E., May, D.: Bringing the inquiring mind back into the labs a conceptual framework to foster the creative attitude in higher engineering education. In: 2014 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Istanbul, pp. 930–935 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. May, D., Terkowsky, C., Haertel, T., Pleul, C.: Using E-Portfolios to support experiential learning and open the use of tele-operated laboratories for mobile devices. In: 2012 9th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), Bilbao, Spain, pp. 1–9 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Terkowsky, C., Haertel, T.: Fostering the creative attitude with remote lab learning environments: an essay on the spirit of research in engineering education. Int. J. Onl. Eng. 9(S5), 13 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Haertel, T., Terkowsky, C., May, D., Pleul, C.: Entwicklung von Remote-Labs zum erfahrungsbasierten Lernen. In: Frerich, S., et al. (eds.) Engineering Education 4.0, pp. 105–112. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. May, D., Terkowsky, C., Haertel, T., Pleul, C.: The laboratory in your hand: making remote laboratories accessible through mobile devices. In: 2013 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Berlin, pp. 335–344 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Ortelt, T.R., et al.: Development of a tele-operative testing cell as a remote lab for material characterization. In: 2014 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), Dubai, UAE, pp. 977–982 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Terkowsky, C., Haertel, T., Bielski, E., May, D.: Creativity@School: mobile learning environments involving remote labs and e-portfolios. A conceptual framework to foster the inquiring mind in secondary STEM education. In: García-Zubía, J., Dziabenko, O. (eds.) IT Innovative Practices in Secondary Schools: Remote Experiments, pp. 255–280. University of Deusto, Bilbao, Spain (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  26. May, D., Ortelt, T.R., Tekkaya, A.E.: Using remote laboratories for transnational online learning environments in engineering education. In: E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2015, pp. 632–637 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  27. May, D., Sadiki, A., Pleul, C., Tekkaya, A.E.: Teaching and learning globally connected using live online classes for preparing international engineering students for transnational collaboration and for studying in Germany. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 118–126 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sadiki. A., et al.: The challenge of specimen handling in remote laboratories for engineering education. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), Bangkok, Thailand, 2015, pp. 180–185 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meya, R., et al.: Development of a tele-operative control for the incremental tube forming process and its integration into a learning environment. In: 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Abu Dhabi, UAE, pp. 80–86 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Selvaggio, A., et al.: Development of a cupping test in remote laboratories for engineering education. In: 13th International Conference on Remote Engineering and Virtual Instrumentation (REV), Madrid, Spain, pp. 122–126 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ortelt, T.R., et al.: Concepts of the international manufacturing remote lab (MINTReLab): combination of a MOOC and a remote lab for a manufacturing technology online course. In: 2016 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Abu Dhabi, UAE, pp. 602–607 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The presented work was done in the scope of the research project “ELLI – Excellent Teaching and Learning in Engineering Sciences”, funded by the German Ministry of Education and Research (project number: 01PL16082).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudius Terkowsky .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Terkowsky, C., Frye, S., May, D. (2021). Using Constructive Alignment to Evaluate Industry 4.0 Competencies in Remote Laboratories for Manufacturing Technology. In: Auer, M., May, D. (eds) Cross Reality and Data Science in Engineering. REV 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1231. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52575-0_50

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics