Skip to main content

Participatory Design of Historytelling Voice Assistance with Older Adults

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health (ICT4AWE 2019)

Abstract

Using information and communication technology (ICT) becomes increasingly important for older adults, yet designers often fail to develop usable software for this group, creating a strong incentive to include older adults in a participatory development process. This paper describes how older adults have been included throughout the development process of a storytelling input component for the Historytelling (HT) project, to attain the best possible usability for older adults. HT provides a digital interactive platform for older adults to share life stories across generations, potentially improving their health and well-being and follows the HCD+ (Human Centered Design for Aging) approach. 19 older adults (M = 68 years old) participated in three studies to analyze, evaluate and design a storytelling voice assistance including a conversational agent. They contributed substantially to the development of the HT project by their involvement in the design process with methods adjusted to comprise characteristics of older adults, addressing three central research questions regarding the type of voice input suitable for older adults, the minimal requirements for a conversational agent and the design of a suitable dialogue system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The first two questions have already been addressed in the conference proceeding [41], on which this chapter is largely based. Q3 has been a later addition to the project and reflects our ongoing HT research and development.

References

  1. Arik, S.O., et al.: Deep voice: real-time neural text-to-speech. In: Proceedings of the 34th International Conference on Machine Learning, vol. 70, pp. 195–204. JMLR.org (2017). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=3305381.3305402

  2. Bornat, J.: Reminiscence and oral history: parallel universes or shared endeavour? Ageing Soc. 21(02), 219–241 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X01008157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandt, E., Grunnet, C.: Evoking the future: drama and props in user centered design. In: Proceedings of Participatory Design Conference, PDC 2000, pp. 11–20 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cassell, J.: Embodied conversational interface agents. Commun. ACM 43(4), 70–78 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen, P.R., Oviatt, S.L.: The role of voice input for human-machine communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92(22), 9921–9927 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Czaja, S.J., Boot, W.R., Charness, N., Rogers, W.A.: Designing for Older Adults: Principles and Creative Human Factors Approaches, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2019)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. De Souza, C.S.: The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Dingler, T., Lindsay, J., Walker, B.N.: Learnability of sound cues for environmental features: auditory icons, earcons, spearcons, and speech. International Community for Auditory Display (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dybkjær, L., Bernsen, N.O., Dybkjær, H.: Grice incorporated: cooperativity in spoken dialogue. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1, COLING 1996, pp. 328–333. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (1996). https://doi.org/10.3115/992628.992686

  10. Eisma, R., Dickinson, A., Goodman, J., Syme, A., Tiwari, L., Newell, A.F.: Early user involvement in the development of information technology-related products for older people. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 3(2), 131–140 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-004-0092-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Franke, T., Attig, C., Wessel, D.: A personal resource for technology interaction: development and validation of the affinity for technology interaction (ATI) scale. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 1–12 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1456150

  12. Grice, H.P., Cole, P., Morgan, J., et al.: Logic and conversation, pp. 41–58 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hailpern, J., Karahalios, K., DeThorne, L., Halle, J.: VocSyl: visualizing syllable production for children with ASD and speech delays. In: Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility, pp. 297–298. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hazen, T.J., Saenko, K., La, C.H., Glass, J.R.: A segment-based audio-visual speech recognizer: data collection, development, and initial experiments, p. 235. ACM Press (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/1027933.1027972

  15. Isbell, R., Sobol, J., Lindauer, L., Lowrance, A.: The effects of storytelling and story reading on the oral language complexity and story comprehension of young children. Early Child. Educ. J. 32(3), 157–163 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ECEJ.0000048967.94189.a3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Isbister, K., Doyle, P.: Design and evaluation of embodied conversational agents: a proposed taxonomy. In: The First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi-Agent Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jacko, J.A.: Human Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications, p. 373. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Kersten Reich: Unterrichtsmethoden im konstruktiven und systemischen methodenpool (2017), http://methodenpool.uni-koeln.de/

  19. Laugwitz, B., Held, T., Schrepp, M.: Construction and evaluation of a user experience questionnaire. In: Holzinger, A. (ed.) USAB 2008. LNCS, vol. 5298, pp. 63–76. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-89350-9_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin, G., Lieberman, Z.: In-situ speech visualization in real-time interactive installation and performance, p. 7. ACM Press (2004). https://doi.org/10.1145/987657.987659

  21. Lindsay, S., Jackson, D., Schofield, G., Olivier, P.: Engaging older people using participatory design. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012, pp. 1199–1208. ACM, New York (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208570

  22. Mozilla Corporation: Web Speech API (2019). https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/Web_Speech_API

  23. Muller, M.J.: Participatory design: the third space in HCI. Human-Comput. Interact.: Dev. Process 4235, 165–185 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Newell, A., Arnott, J., Carmichael, A., Morgan, M.: Methodologies for involving older adults in the design process. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) UAHCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4554, pp. 982–989. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73279-2_110

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Nobre, G.F., Touring, A.: Political communicative agents. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Politics and Information Systems, Technologies and Applications, Orlando (FL), pp. 88–93 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Orso, V., Spagnolli, A., Gamberini, L., Ibañez, F., Fabregat, M.E.: Involving older adults in designing interactive technology: the case of SeniorChannel. In: Proceedings of the 11th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter, CHItaly 2015, pp. 102–109. ACM, New York (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2808435.2808464

  27. Ortiz, A., del Puy Carretero, M., Oyarzun, D., Yanguas, J.J., Buiza, C., Gonzalez, M.F., Etxeberria, I.: Elderly users in ambient intelligence: does an avatar improve the interaction? In: Stephanidis, C., Pieper, M. (eds.) UI4ALL 2006. LNCS, vol. 4397, pp. 99–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-71025-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Petherbridge, N.: Artificial intelligence scripting language (2019). https://www.rivescript.com

  29. Rice, M., Newell, A., Morgan, M.: Forum Theatre as a requirements gathering methodology in the design of a home telecommunication system for older adults. Behav. Inf. Technol. 26(4), 323–331 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1080/01449290601177045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Schafer, R.W.: Scientific bases of human-machine communication by voice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 92(22), 9914–9920 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.22.9914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Sengpiel, M., Dittberner, D.: The computer literacy scale (CLS) for older adults-development and validation. In: Mensch & Computer, pp. 7–16 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Sengpiel, M., Volkmann, T., Jochems, N.: Considering older adults throughout the development process - The HCD+ approach. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Europe Chapter 2018 Annual Conference, Berlin (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Sengpiel, M., Wandke, H.: Compensating the effects of age differences in computer literacy on the use of ticket vending machines through minimal video instruction. Occup. Ergon. 9, 87–98 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Sumikawa, D.: Guidelines for the integration of audio cues into computer user interfaces, June 1985

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sutcliffe, A.: Designing user interfaces in emotionally-sensitive applications. In: Bernhaupt, R., Dalvi, G., Joshi, A., K. Balkrishan, D., O’Neill, J., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2017. LNCS, vol. 10515, pp. 404–422. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67687-6_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsiourti, C., Joly, E., Wings, C., Moussa, M.B., Wac, K.: Virtual assistive companions for older adults: qualitative field study and design implications. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, PervasiveHealth 2014, pp. 57–64. ICST (Institute for Computer Sciences, Social-Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering), ICST, Brussels (2014). https://doi.org/10.4108/icst.pervasivehealth.2014.254943

  37. Tsiourti, C., Quintas, J., Ben-Moussa, M., Hanke, S., Nijdam, N.A., Konstantas, D.: The CaMeLi framework—A multimodal virtual companion for older adults. In: Bi, Y., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds.) IntelliSys 2016. SCI, vol. 751, pp. 196–217. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69266-1_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Universität zu Lübeck: Historytelling (2019). http://historytelling.eu/

  39. Vasardani, M., Timpf, S., Winter, S., Tomko, M.: From descriptions to depictions: a conceptual framework. In: Tenbrink, T., Stell, J., Galton, A., Wood, Z. (eds.) COSIT 2013. LNCS, vol. 8116, pp. 299–319. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01790-7_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Volkmann, T., Dohse, F., Sengpiel, M., Jochems, N.: Age-appropriate design of an input component for the historytelling project. In: Bagnara, S., Tartaglia, R., Albolino, S., Alexander, T., Fujita, Y. (eds.) IEA 2018. AISC, vol. 822, pp. 672–680. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96077-7_73

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Volkmann., T., Sengpiel., M., Karam., R., Jochems., N.: Age-appropriate participatory design of a storytelling voice input in the context of historytelling. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health - Volume 1: ICT4AWE, pp. 104–112. INSTICC, SciTePress (2019). https://doi.org/10.5220/0007729801040112

  42. Volkmann, T., Unger, A., Sengpiel, M., Jochems, N.: Development of an age-appropriate style guide within the historytelling project. In: Zhou, J., Salvendy, G. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11592, pp. 84–97. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22012-9_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Weiss, B., Wechsung, I., Kühnel, C., Möller, S.: Evaluating embodied conversational agents in multimodal interfaces. Comput. Cogn. Sci. 1(1), 1–21 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40469-015-0006-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wood, L.E.: Semi-structured interviewing for user-centered design. Interactions 4(2), 48–61 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1145/245129.245134

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Torben Volkmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Volkmann, T., Sengpiel, M., Karam, R., Jochems, N. (2020). Participatory Design of Historytelling Voice Assistance with Older Adults. In: Ziefle, M., Maciaszek, L. (eds) Information and Communication Technologies for Ageing Well and e-Health. ICT4AWE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1219. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52677-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52677-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-52676-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-52677-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics