Skip to main content

A Note on Risk-Limiting Bayesian Polling Audits for Two-Candidate Elections

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Financial Cryptography and Data Security (FC 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 12063))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1683 Accesses

Abstract

This short paper provides a general form for a polling audit that is both Bayesian and risk-limiting: the Bayesian Risk-Limiting (Polling) Audit, which enables the use of a Bayesian approach to explore more efficient Risk-Limiting Audits. A numerical example illustrates the implications to practice.

This material is based upon work supported in part by NSF Award CNS 1421373.

Author was partially supported by Polish National Science Centre contract number DEC-2013/09/D/ST6/03927 and by Wroclaw University of Science and Technology [0401/0052/18].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Philip Stark has mentioned a CLIP-like audit which does not use simulations as work in progress.

References

  1. Lindeman, M., Stark, P.B.: A gentle introduction to risk-limiting audits. IEEE Secur. Priv. 10(5), 42–49 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindeman, M., Stark, P.B., Yates, V.S.: BRAVO: ballot-polling risk-limiting audits to verify outcomes. In: EVT/WOTE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ottoboni, K., Stark, P.B., Lindeman, M., McBurnett, N.: Risk-limiting audits by stratified union-intersection tests of elections (SUITE). In: Krimmer, R., et al. (eds.) E-Vote-ID 2018. LNCS, vol. 11143, pp. 174–188. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00419-4_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Rivest, R.L.: ClipAudit–a simple post-election risk-limiting audit. arXiv:1701.08312

  5. Rivest, R.L., Shen, E.: A Bayesian method for auditing elections. In: EVT/WOTE (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vora, P.L.: Risk-limiting Bayesian polling audits for two candidate elections. CoRR abs/1902.00999 (2019). http://arxiv.org/abs/1902.00999

  7. Wald, A.: Sequential tests of statistical hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat. 16(2), 117–186 (1945)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Poorvi L. Vora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Morin, S., McClearn, G., McBurnett, N., Vora, P.L., Zagórski, F. (2020). A Note on Risk-Limiting Bayesian Polling Audits for Two-Candidate Elections. In: Bernhard, M., et al. Financial Cryptography and Data Security. FC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12063. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54455-3_24

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54455-3_24

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54454-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54455-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics