Skip to main content

CriSGen: Constraint-Based Generation of Critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Formal Methods. FM 2019 International Workshops (FM 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12232))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Ensuring pedestrian-safety is paramount to the acceptance and success of autonomous cars. The scenario-based training and testing of such self-driving vehicles in virtual driving simulation environments has increasingly gained attention in the past years. A key challenge is the automated generation of critical traffic scenarios which usually are rare in real-world traffic, while computing and testing all possible scenarios is infeasible in practice. In this paper, we present a formal method-based approach CriSGen for an automated and complete generation of critical traffic scenarios for virtual training of self-driving cars. These scenarios are determined as close variants of given but uncritical and formally abstracted scenarios via reasoning on their non-linear arithmetic constraint formulas, such that the original maneuver of the self-driving car in them will not be pedestrian-safe anymore, enforcing it to further adapt the behavior during training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    OpenDS scenarios are described in specific XML files from which such behaviors can be extracted.

  2. 2.

    This disallows maneuvers in which a car drives slowly by, say, 1 m/s, and decelerates by 2 m/s, thus reversing its motion direction. Reversing the sense of direction should be described by decelerating to a stop and a further deceleration for driving backwards.

  3. 3.

    The units do not really matter as long as they are kept consistent throughout the specification.

  4. 4.

    This can trivially be described as a quantifier elimination problem.

  5. 5.

    \(\epsilon \) compensates minor differences between the computed reachable states and the driving simulator’s behavior.

  6. 6.

    Evidently, for any \(0\le c\le a\le 10\) the corresponding instantiation is behavior equivalent to the original scenario. Therefore the safe (green) variants form the top-left triangle instead of a single point.

  7. 7.

    Note that in this illustration the unsafe region and the original region do not intersect, since cutting the area with the plane at \(b=1\) produces exactly Fig. 5.

References

  1. Althoff, M., Lutz, S.: automatic generation of safety-critical test scenarios for collision avoidance of road vehicles. In: Proceedings of the 29th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aréchiga, N.: Specifying safety of autonomous vehicles in signal temporal logic. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bouton, M., Nakhaei, A., Fujimura, K., Kochenderfer, M.J.: Safe reinforcement learning with scene decomposition for navigating complex urban environments. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Damm, W., Kemper, S., Möhlmann, E., Peikenkamp, T., Rakow, A.: Traffic sequence charts - from visualization to semantics. Technical report, AVACS (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. DFKI: OpenDS. https://opends.dfki.de/

  6. Dolzmann, A., Sturm, T.: Redlog. http://www.redlog.eu

  7. Dolzmann, A., Sturm, T., Weispfenning, V.: Real quantifier elimination in practice. In: Matzat, B.H., Greuel, G.M., Hiss, G. (eds.) Algorithmic Algebra and Number Theory. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-59932-3_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Eggers, A., Stasch, M., Teige, T., Bienmüller, T., Brockmeyer, U.: Constraint systems from traffic scenarios for the validation of autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of Symbolic Computation and Satisfiability Checking (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frassinelli, D., Gambi, A., Nürnberger, S., Park, S.: DRiVERSITY - synthetic torture testing to find limits of autonomous driving algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 2nd ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium (CSCS) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fremont, D.J., Dreossi, T., Ghosh, S., Yue, X., Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L., Seshia, S.A.: Scenic: a language for scenario specification and scene generation. In: Proceedings of the 40th ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Programming Language Design and Implementation (PLDI). ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Groh, K., Kuehbeck, T., Fleischmann, B., Schiementz, M., Chibelushi, C.C.: Towards a scenario-based assessment method for highly automated driving functions. In: Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Driver Assistance (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Henzinger, T.A., Rusu, V.: Reachability verification for hybrid automata. In: Henzinger, T.A., Sastry, S. (eds.) HSCC 1998. LNCS, vol. 1386, pp. 190–204. Springer, Heidelberg (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-64358-3_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Jesenski, S., Stellet, J.E., Schiegg, F., Zöllner, J.M.: Generation of scenes in intersections for the validation of highly automated driving functions. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klischat, M., Althoff, M.: Generating critical test scenarios for automated vehicles with evolutionary algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lamport, L.: Hybrid systems in TLA+. In: Grossman, R.L., Nerode, A., Ravn, A.P., Rischel, H. (eds.) HS 1991-1992. LNCS, vol. 736, pp. 77–102. Springer, Heidelberg (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57318-6_25

  16. Menzel, T., Bagschik, G., Isensee, L., Schomburg, A., Maurer, M.: From functional to logical scenarios: detailing a keyword-based scenario description for execution in a simulation environment. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pusse, F., Klusch, M.: Hybrid online POMDP planning and deep reinforcement learning for safer self-driving cars. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV). IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Queiroz, R., Berger, T., Czarnecki, K.: GeoScenario: an open DSL for autonomous driving scenario representation. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wachi, A.: Failure-scenario maker for rule-based agent using multi-agent adversarial reinforcement learning and its application to autonomous driving. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Yaghoubi, S., Fainekos, G.: Gray-box adversarial testing for control systems with machine learning components. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM International Conference on Hybrid Systems: Computation and Control (HSCC) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This research was supported by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research (BMB+F) in the project REACT.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Nonnengart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nonnengart, A., Klusch, M., Müller, C. (2020). CriSGen: Constraint-Based Generation of Critical Scenarios for Autonomous Vehicles. In: Sekerinski, E., et al. Formal Methods. FM 2019 International Workshops. FM 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12232. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54994-7_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54994-7_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-54993-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-54994-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics