Skip to main content

Learning Actions with Symbolic Literals and Continuous Effects for a Waypoint Navigation Simulation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent Systems and Applications (IntelliSys 2020)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1250))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1048 Accesses

Abstract

We present an algorithm for learning planning actions for waypoint simulations, a crucial subtask for robotics, gaming, and transportation agents that must perform locomotion behavior. Our algorithm is capable of learning operator’s symbolic literals and continuous effects even under noisy training data. It accepts as input a set of preprocessed positive and negative simulation-generated examples. It identifies symbolic preconditions using a MAX-SAT constraint solver and learns numeric preconditions and effects as continuous functions of numeric state variables by fitting a logistic regression model. We test the correctness of the learned operators by solving test problems and running the resulting plans on the simulator.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://simpy.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

  2. 2.

    https://www.json.org/.

  3. 3.

    https://github.com/jponf/wpm1py.

References

  1. Bettstetter, C., Wagner, C.: The spatial node distribution of the random waypoint mobility model. In: WMAN, vol. 11, pp. 41–58 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tan, C.H., Ang, J.H., Tan, K.C., Tay, A.: Online adaptive controller for simulated car racing. In: 2008 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), pp. 2239–2245. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bruce, J., Veloso, M.M.: Real-time randomized path planning for robot navigation. In: Robot Soccer World Cup, pp. 288–295. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Arora, A., Fiorino, H., Pellier, D., Métivier, M., Pesty, S.: A review of learning planning action models. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 33 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Segura-Muros, J.Á., Pérez, R., Fernández-Olivares, J.: Learning numerical action models from noisy and partially observable states by means of inductive rule learning techniques. In: KEPS 2018, vol. 46 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Balac, N., Gaines, D.M., Fisher, D.: Learning action models for navigation in noisy environments. In: ICML Workshop on Machine Learning of Spatial Knowledge, Stanford, July 2000

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, Q., Wu, K., Jiang, Y.: Learning action models from plan examples using weighted MAX-SAT. Artif. Intell. 171(2–3), 107–143 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Gil, Y.: Learning by experimentation: incremental refinement of incomplete planning domains. In: Machine Learning Proceedings 1994, pp. 87–95. Morgan Kaufmann (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Benson, S.S.: Learning action models for reactive autonomous agents. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lavrac, N., Dzeroski, S.: Inductive logic programming. In: WLP, pp. 146–160 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Nilsson, N.: Teleo-reactive programs for agent control. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 1, 139–158 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pasula, H.M., Zettlemoyer, L.S., Kaelbling, L.P.: Learning symbolic models of stochastic domains. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 29, 309–352 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindsay, A., Gregory, P.: Discovering Numeric Constraints for Planning Domain Models. In: KEPS 2018, vol. 62 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Walsh, T.J., Littman, M.L.: Efficient learning of action schemas and web-service descriptions. In: AAAI-2008, vol. 8, pp. 714–719 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ansótegui, C., et al.: Improving SAT-based weighted MaxSAT solvers. In: International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming, pp. 86–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hosmer Jr., D.W., Lemeshow, S., Sturdivant, R.X.: Applied Logistic Regression, vol. 398. Wiley, Hoboken (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hector Muños-Avila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fine-Morris, M., Auslander, B., Muños-Avila, H., Gupta, K. (2021). Learning Actions with Symbolic Literals and Continuous Effects for a Waypoint Navigation Simulation. In: Arai, K., Kapoor, S., Bhatia, R. (eds) Intelligent Systems and Applications. IntelliSys 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1250. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55180-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics