Skip to main content

Looking at Driving Automation from a Passenger’s Perspective: Driving Experience and Gaze Behavior During Fully Automated vs. Human Vehicle Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications III (IHIET 2020)

Abstract

The idea of transferring vehicle control to an automated system and thereby transforming from driver to passenger has raised safety concerns among potential users. To examine vehicle occupants’ perception (perceived safety and driving comfort, monitoring gaze behavior) of automated vehicle control in light of actual system experience, a driving simulator study with 50 participants was conducted comparing automated vs. human vehicle control from a passenger’s perspective. Automated vehicle control was perceived as less safe and comfortable, resulting in the majority of participants preferring human vehicle control. Correspondingly, participants performed more monitoring gaze behavior during automated than human vehicle control. The results underline the importance of a transparent, user-adaptive system design to create positive driving experiences especially during the first contact, thereby ensuring acceptance and usage by diverse users, who differ in their attitude towards automated vehicles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ERTRAC: Automated Driving Roadmap (2017). https://www.ertrac.org/uploads/documentsearch/id48/ERTRAC_Automated_Driving_2017.pdf

  2. SAE International: Taxonomy and definitions for terms related to on-road motor vehicle automated driving Systems (2018). www.sae.org/standards/content/j3016_201806

  3. Nordhoff, S., van Arem, B., Happee, R.: A conceptual model to explain, predict, and improve user acceptance of driverless vehicles. Transp. Res. Rec. 2602, 60–67 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hergeth, S., Lorenz, L., Vilimek, R., Krems, J.F.: Keep your scanners peeled: gaze behavior as a measure of automation trust during highly automated driving. Hum. Factors 58, 509–519 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Engelbrecht, A.: Fahrkomfort und Fahrspaß bei Einsatz von Fahrerassistenzsystemen [Driving Comfort and Enjoyment when Using Driver Assistance Systems]. Disserta-Verlag, Hamburg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee, J.D., See, K.A.: Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46(1), 50–80 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Strauch, C., Mühl, K., Patro, K., Grabmaier, C., Reithinger, S., Baumann, M., Huckauf, A.: Real autonomous driving from a passenger’s perspective: two experimental investigations using gaze behaviour and trust ratings in field and simulator. Transp. Res. Part F 66, 15–28 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fraedrich, E., Lenz, B.: Societal and individual acceptance of autonomous driving. In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H. (eds.) Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, pp. 621–640. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wolf, I.: The interaction between humans and autonomous agents. In: Maurer, M., Gerdes, J.C., Lenz, B., Winner, H. (eds.) Autonomous Driving: Technical, Legal and Social Aspects, pp. 103–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schoettle, B., Sivak, M.: Public opinion about self-driving vehicles in China, India, Japan, the U.S., the U.K., and Australia (No. UMTRI-2014-30). The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Drewitz, U., Ihme, K., Oehl, M., Schrödel, F., Voßwinkel, R., Hartwich, F., Schmidt, C., Pape, A.-A., Fleischer, T., Cornelsen, S., Lüdtke, A., Gräfing, D., Trende, A.: Automation ohne Unsicherheit: Vorstellung des Förderprojekts AutoAkzept zur Erhöhung der Akzeptanz automatisierten Fahrens. [Automation without uncertainty: Introducing the research project AutoAkzept for enhancing the acceptance of automated driving.] In VDI (ed.). Mensch-Maschine-Mobilität 2019. Der (Mit-)Fahrer im 21. Jahrhundert!? VDI-Berichte 2360, pp. 1–19. VDI Verlag, Düsseldorf (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study is part of the research project AutoAkzept, which is funded by the Federal Ministry of Transport and Digital Infrastructure (BMVI) under grant no. 16AVF2126E.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cornelia Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schmidt, C., Hartwich, F., Krems, J.F. (2021). Looking at Driving Automation from a Passenger’s Perspective: Driving Experience and Gaze Behavior During Fully Automated vs. Human Vehicle Control. In: Ahram, T., Taiar, R., Langlois, K., Choplin, A. (eds) Human Interaction, Emerging Technologies and Future Applications III. IHIET 2020. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1253. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55307-4_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55306-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55307-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics