Abstract
Academia and industry are constantly engaged in a joint effort for producing scientific knowledge that will shape the society of the future. Analysing the knowledge flow between them and understanding how they influence each other is a critical task for researchers, governments, funding bodies, investors, and companies. However, current corpora are unfit to support large-scale analysis of the knowledge flow between academia and industry since they lack of a good characterization of research topics and industrial sectors. In this short paper, we introduce the Academia/Industry DynAmics (AIDA) Knowledge Graph, which characterizes 14M papers and 8M patents according to the research topics drawn from the Computer Science Ontology. 4M papers and 5M patents are also classified according to the type of the author’s affiliations (academy, industry, or collaborative) and 66 industrial sectors (e.g., automotive, financial, energy, electronics) obtained from DBpedia. AIDA was generated by an automatic pipeline that integrates several knowledge graphs and bibliographic corpora, including Microsoft Academic Graph, Dimensions, English DBpedia, the Computer Science Ontology, and the Global Research Identifier Database.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
References
Ammar, W., et al.: Construction of the literature graph in semantic scholar. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pp. 84–91. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018)
Anderson, M.S.: The complex relations between the academy and industry: views from the literature. J. High. Educ. 72(2), 226–246 (2001)
Angioni, S., Osborne, F., Salatino, A.A., Reforgiato, D., Recupero, E.M.: Integrating knowledge graphs for comparing the scientific output of academia and industry. In: International Semantic Web Conference ISWC, vol. 2019, pp. 85–88 (2019)
Ankrah, S., Omar, A.T.: Universities-industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scand. J. Manag. 31(3), 387–408 (2015)
Ankrah, S.N., Burgess, T.F., Grimshaw, P., Shaw, N.E.: Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: what single-group studies of motives omit. Technovation 33(2–3), 50–65 (2013)
Bikard, M., Vakili, K., Teodoridis, F.: When collaboration bridges institutions: the impact of university-industry collaboration on academic productivity. Org. Sci. 30(2), 426–445 (2019)
Knoth, P., Zdrahal, Z.: Core: three access levels to underpin open access. D-Lib Mag. 18(11/12), 1–13 (2012)
Lehmann, J., Isele, R., Jakob, M., Jentzsch, A., Kontokostas, D., Mendes, P.N., et al.: Dbpedia-a large-scale, multilingual knowledge base extracted from Wikipedia. Seman. Web 6(2), 167–195 (2015)
Mannocci, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: The evolution of IJHCS and CHI: a quantitative analysis. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 131, 23–40 (2019)
Peroni, S., Shotton, D.: Opencitations, an infrastructure organization for open scholarship. Quant. Sci. Stud. 1(1), 428–444 (2020)
Salatino, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: Researchflow: understanding the knowledge flow between academia and industry (2020). http://skm.kmi.open.ac.uk/rf-utkfbaai/
Salatino, A.A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: How are topics born? Understanding the research dynamics preceding the emergence of new areas. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e119 (2017)
Salatino, A.A., Osborne, F., Thanapalasingam, T., Motta, E.: The CSO classifier: ontology-driven detection of research topics in scholarly articles. In: Doucet, A., Isaac, A., Golub, K., Aalberg, T., Jatowt, A. (eds.) TPDL 2019. LNCS, vol. 11799, pp. 296–311. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30760-8_26
Salatino, A.A., Thanapalasingam, T., Mannocci, A., Birukou, A., Osborne, F., Motta, E.: The computer science ontology: a comprehensive automatically-generated taxonomy of research areas. Data Intell. 1–38 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1162/dint_a_00055
Sinha, A., et al.: An overview of Microsoft academic service (MAS) and applications. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 243–246 (2015)
Weinstein, L.B., Kellar, G.M., Hall, D.C.: Comparing topic importance perceptions of industry and business school faculty: is the tail wagging the dog? Acad. Educ. Leadersh. J. 20(2), 62 (2016)
Zhang, Y., Zhang, F., Yao, P., Tang, J.: Name disambiguation in AMiner: clustering, maintenance, and human in the loop. In: Proceedings of the 24th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining, pp. 1002–1011 (2018)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Angioni, S., Salatino, A.A., Osborne, F., Recupero, D.R., Motta, E. (2020). Integrating Knowledge Graphs for Analysing Academia and Industry Dynamics. In: Bellatreche, L., et al. ADBIS, TPDL and EDA 2020 Common Workshops and Doctoral Consortium. TPDL ADBIS 2020 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55814-7_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55814-7_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-55813-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-55814-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)