Abstract
Agile software development methods, in their various different forms, have become the basis for most software projects in today’s world. The methodology is present in almost all organisations today. However, despite the popularity, failure rates in software projects remain high. This paper identifies why agile methodologies have become so successful. In addition, the paper discusses certain factors that may often be overlooked in organisations that have adopted agile methods, such as rework, maintainability, adoption, turnover rates and the potential costs associated with each. The research carried out was a multivocal literature review (MLR). Multiple white and grey literature which was deemed to be relevant was selected. 32 contributions from white literature were selected for use in the review as well as 8 from grey literature sources. We find that while agile has many advantages, organisations may overlook the potential downsides of using an agile methodology. If not managed or implemented correctly, organisations risk taking on more hidden and expensive costs, for example in relation to rework. It is important that organisations are sufficiently trained in agile methods in order to succeed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Annual State of Agile Survey. www.stateofagile.com/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Shewchuk, J.P.: Agile manufacturing: one size does not fit all. In: Bititci, U.S., Carrie, A.S. (eds.) Strategic Management of the Manufacturing Value Chain. ITIFIP, vol. 2, pp. 143–150. Springer, Boston (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35321-0_16
Agile budgeting: How much will it cost? Agilest.org. Accessed 10 June 2020
Stoica, M., Marinela, M., Bogdan, G-M.: Software development: agile vs. traditional. Inf. Econ. 17(4) (2013)
Korkala, M., Maurer, F.: Waste identification as the means for improving communication in globally distributed agile software development. J. Syst. Softw. 95, 122–140 (2014)
Boehm, B.: Get ready for agile methods, with care. Computer 35(1), 64–69 (2002)
Serrador, P., Pinto, J.K.: Does Agile work?—A quantitative analysis of agile project success. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 33(5), 1040–1051 (2015)
Highsmith, J.: Agile Software Development Ecosystems. Addison Wesley, Boston (2002)
Shore, J.: The Art of Agile Development: Pragmatic Guide to Agile Software Development. O’Reilly Media, Inc., Newton (2007)
Van Der Westhuizen, D., Fitzgerald, E.P.: Defining and measuring project success. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on IS Management, Leadership and Governance 2005. Academic Conferences Limited (2005)
Standish Group. 2015 Chaos Report
McDonald, K.: Agile Q&A: Why do Organizations Adopt Agile? www.agilealliance.org/why-do-organizations-adopt-agile/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Jefferies, R.: Developers should abandon agile. https://ronjeffries.com/articles/018–01ff/abandon-1/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Nicolette, D.: Questioning Agile Dogma. www.leadingagile.com/2019/02/questioning-agile-dogma/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Chow, T., Cao, D.-B.: A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. J. Syst. Softw. 81(6), 961–971 (2008)
Hoda, R., Noble, J., Marshall, S.: The impact of inadequate customer collaboration on self-organizing agile teams. Inf. Softw. Technol. 53(5), 521–534 (2011)
Knippers, D.: Agile software development and maintainability. In: 15th Twente Student Conference (2011)
Ersoy, I.B., Mahdy, A.M.: Agile knowledge sharing. Int. J. Softw. Eng. (IJSE) 6(1), 1–15 (2015)
An Agile Agenda, 6Point6 Technology Services, April 2017. https://6point6.co.uk/insights/an-agile-agenda/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., Lassenius, C.: Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: a systematic literature review. J. Syst. Softw. 119, 87–108 (2016)
Chau, T., Maurer, F.: Knowledge sharing in agile software teams. In: Lenski, W. (ed.) Logic versus Approximation. LNCS, vol. 3075, pp. 173–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-25967-1_12
Kajko-Mattsson, M.: Problems in agile trenches. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (2008)
Ramdoo, V., Huzooree, G.: Strategies to reduce rework in software development on an organisation in mauritius. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Appl. 6(5), 9–20 (2015)
Fairley, R.E., Willshire, M.J.: Iterative rework: the good, the bad, and the ugly. Computer 38(9), 34–41 (2005)
The Agile Manifesto, Agile Alliance (2001). https://agilemanifesto.org/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Inayat, I., Marczak, S., Salim, S.S.: Studying relevant socio-technical aspects of requirements-driven collaboration in agile teams. In: 2013 3rd International Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE). IEEE (2013)
Chichakly, K.: Modeling agile development: when is it effective? In: Proceedings of International Conference of the System Dynamics Society (2007)
Alsalemi, A.M., Yeoh, E.-T.: A survey on product backlog change management and requirement traceability in agile (Scrum). In: 2015 9th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC). IEEE (2015)
Saran, C: Agile development, an ‘IT fad’ that risks iterative failure, May 2017. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/450418205/Agile-development-an-IT-fad-that-risks-iterative-failure. Accessed 10 June 2020
Johnston, A.: The role of the agile architect. https://www.agilearchitect.org//agile/role.htm. Accessed 10 June 2020
Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., Mangalaraj, G.: Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. Commun. ACM 48(5), 72–78 (2005)
Krigsman, M.: Worldwide cost of IT failure, December 2009
Coram, M., Bohner, S.: The impact of agile methods on software project management. In: 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems (ECBS 2005). IEEE (2005)
Geographically Distributed Agile Teams, PMI Disciplined Agile. https://www.pmi.org/disciplined-agile/agility-at-scale/tactical-agility-at-scale/geographically-distributed-agile-teams. Accessed 10 June 2020
Kajko-Mattsson, M., Azizyan, G., Magarian, M.K.: Classes of distributed agile development problems. In: 2010 Agile Conference. IEEE (2010)
Melnik, G., Maurer, F.: Comparative analysis of job satisfaction in agile and non-agile software development teams. In: Abrahamsson, P., Marchesi, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2006. LNCS, vol. 4044, pp. 32–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11774129_4
Tripp, J.F., Riemenschneider, C., Thatcher, J.B.: Job satisfaction in agile development teams: agile development as work redesign. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 17(4), 267 (2016)
Meier, A., Kropp, M., Anslow, C., Biddle, R.: Stress in agile software development: practices and outcomes. In: Garbajosa, J., Wang, X., Aguiar, A. (eds.) XP 2018. LNBIP, vol. 314, pp. 259–266. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91602-6_18
Mannaro, K., Melis, M., Marchesi, M.: Empirical analysis on the satisfaction of IT employees comparing XP practices with other software development methodologies. In: Eckstein, J., Baumeister, H. (eds.) XP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3092, pp. 166–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_19
Tessem, B., Maurer, F.: Job satisfaction and motivation in a large agile team. In: Concas, G., Damiani, E., Scotto, M., Succi, G. (eds.) XP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4536, pp. 54–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73101-6_8
DeMarco, T., Lister, T.: Peopleware: Productive Projects and Teams. Addison-Wesley, Boston (2013). pp. 17, 118
Documentation in agile: how much and when to write it? InfoQ, January 2014. https://www.infoq.com/news/2014/01/documentation-agile-how-much/. Accessed 10 June 2020
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Yilmaz, M.: In search of the origins and enduring impact of agile software development. In: ACM Proceedings of the International Conference of Software and System Processes (ICSSP 2018), Gothenburg, Sweden, 26–27 May 2018, pp. 142–146 (2018)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: The situational factors that affect the software development process: towards a comprehensive reference framework. Inf. Softw. Technol. 54(5), 433–447 (2012)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, Rory V.: The meaning of success for software SMEs: an holistic scorecard based approach. In: O‘Connor, R.V., Pries-Heje, J., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2011. CCIS, vol. 172, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22206-1_7
Garousi, V., Felderer, M., Mäntylä, M.V.: Guidelines for including grey literature and conducting multivocal literature reviews in software engineering. Elsevier J. Inf. Softw. Technol. 106, 101–121 (2019)
O’Connor, R.V., Elger, P., Clarke, P.: Continuous software engineering - a microservices architecture perspective. J. Softw.: Evol. Process 29(11), 1–12 (2017)
Beck, K.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change. Addison Wesley, Boston (2000)
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Leavy, B.: A complexity theory viewpoint on the software development process and situational context. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Process (ICSSP), pp. 86–90 (2016)
Rashid, M., Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: A systematic examination of knowledge loss in open source software projects. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (IJIM) 46, 104–123 (2019)
O’Connor, R.V., Elger, P., Clarke, P.: Exploring the impact of situational context: a case study of a software development process for a microservices architecture. In: proceedings of the International Conference on Software and Systems Process (ICSSP), Co-Located with the International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE), pp. 6–10 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2904354.2904368
Clarke, P.M., O’Connor, R.V., Solan, D., Elger, P., Yilmaz, M., Ennis, A., Gerrity, M., McGrath, S., Treanor, R.: Exploring software process variation arising from differences in situational context. In: Stolfa, J., Stolfa, S., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2017. CCIS, vol. 748, pp. 29–42. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64218-5_3
Giray, G., Yilmaz, M., O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.M.: The impact of situational context on software process: a case study of a very small-sized company in the online advertising domain. In: Larrucea, X., Santamaria, I., O’Connor, R.V., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2018. CCIS, vol. 896, pp. 28–39. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97925-0_3
Marks, G., O’Connor, R.V., Clarke, P.M.: The impact of situational context on the software development process – a case study of a highly innovative start-up organization. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., O’Connor, R.V., Rout, T., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2017. CCIS, vol. 770, pp. 455–466. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67383-7_33
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V.: Changing situational contexts present a constant challenge to software developers. In: O’Connor, R., Umay Akkaya, M., Kemaneci, K., Yilmaz, M., Poth, A., Messnarz, R. (eds.) EuroSPI 2015. CCIS, vol. 543, pp. 100–111. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24647-5_9
Clarke, P., O’Connor, R.V., Leavy, B., Yilmaz, M.: Exploring the relationship between software process adaptive capability and organisational performance. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 41(12), 1169–1183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/tse.2015.2467388
Acknowledgements
This work was supported, in part, by Science Foundation Ireland grant 13/RC/2094 and co-funded under the European Regional Development Fund through the Southern & Eastern Regional Operational Programme to Lero - the Irish Software Research Centre (www.lero.ie).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fogarty, A. et al. (2020). Agile Software Development – Do We Really Calculate the Costs? A Multivocal Literature Review. In: Yilmaz, M., Niemann, J., Clarke, P., Messnarz, R. (eds) Systems, Software and Services Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1251. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56441-4_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-56440-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-56441-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)