Skip to main content

Secure Matrix Computation: A Viable Alternative to Record Linkage?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Privacy in Statistical Databases (PSD 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12276))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 679 Accesses

Abstract

Linking data from different sources can enrich the research opportunities in the Social Sciences. However, datasets can typically only be linked if the respondents consent to the linkage. Strategies from the secure multi-party computation literature, which do not require linkage on the record level, might be a viable alternative in this context to avoid biases due to selective non-consent. In this paper, we evaluate whether such a strategy could actually be successfully applied in practice by replicating a study based on linked data available at the Institute for Employment Research. We find that almost identical results could be obtained without the requirement to link the data. However, we also identify several problems suggesting that the proposed strategy might not be feasible in many practical contexts without further modification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Beaton, A.E.: The use of special matrix operators in statistical calculus. ETS Res. Bull. Ser 1964(2), i–222 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Blau, F.D., Kahn, L.M.: The gender wage gap: extent, trends, and explanations. J. Econ. Lit. 55(3), 789–865 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blinder, A.S.: Wage discrimination: reduced form and structural estimates. J. Hum. Resour. 8(4), 436–455 (1973). http://www.jstor.org/stable/144855

  4. Blossfeld, H.P., Von Maurice, J.: Education as a lifelong process. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft Sonderheft 14, 19–34 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Du, W., Han, Y., Chen, S.: Privacy-preserving multivariate statistical analysis: linear regression and classification. In: Proceedings of the 2004 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, pp. 222–233 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durham, E., Xue, Y., Kantarcioglu, M., Malin, B.: Quantifying the correctness, computational complexity, and security of privacy-preserving string comparators for record linkage. Inf. Fusion 13(4), 245–259 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fienberg, S.E., Nardi, Y., Slavković, A.B.: Valid statistical analysis for logistic regression with multiple sources. In: Gal, C.S., Kantor, P.B., Lesk, M.E. (eds.) ISIPS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5661, pp. 82–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-10233-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gessendorfer, J., Beste, J., Drechsler, J., Sakshaug, J.W.: Statistical matching as a supplement to record linkage: a valuable method to tackle nonconsent bias? J. Official Stat. 34(4), 909–933 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ghosh, J., Reiter, J.P., Karr, A.F.: Secure computation with horizontally partitioned data using adaptive regression splines. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51(12), 5813–5820 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Heß, P., Jannsen, S., Leber, U.: Digitalisierung und berufliche Weiterbildung: Beschäftigte, deren Tätigkeiten durch Technologien ersetzbar sind, bilden sich seltener weiter. IAB-Kurzbericht 16/2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacobebbinghaus, P., Seth, S.: Linked-Employer-Employee-Daten des IAB: LIAB - Querschnittmodell 2, 1993–2008. FDZ-Datenreport, Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Karr, A., Lin, X., Reiter, J., Sanil, A.: Privacy preserving analysis of vertically partitioned data using secure matrix products. J. Official Stat. 25, 125–138 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Karr, A.F., Lin, X., Sanil, A.P., Reiter, J.P.: Secure regression on distributed databases. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 14(2), 263–279 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin, X., Karr, A.F.: Privacy-preserving maximum likelihood estimation for distributed data. J. Priv. Confidentiality, 1(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Little, R.J.A., Rubin, D.B.: Statistical Analysis with Missing Data, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Oaxaca, R.: Male-female wage differentials in urban labor markets. Int. Econ. Rev. 14(3), 693–709 (1973). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2525981

  17. Rao, F.Y., Cao, J., Bertino, E., Kantarcioglu, M.: Hybrid private record linkage: separating differentially private synopses from matching records. ACM Trans. Priv. Secur. (TOPS) 22(3), 1–36 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sakshaug, J.W., Huber, M.: An evaluation of panel nonresponse and linkage consent bias in a survey of employees in Germany. J. Surv. Stat. Method. 4(1), 71–93 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sakshaug, J.W., Kreuter, F.: Assessing the magnitude of non-consent biases in linked survey and administrative data. Surv. Res. Methods 6, 113–122 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sanil, A.P., Karr, A.F., Lin, X., Reiter, J.P.: Privacy preserving regression modelling via distributed computation. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 677–682 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schnell, R.: An efficient privacy-preserving record linkage technique for administrative data and censuses. Stat. J. IAOS 30(3), 263–270 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Verykios, V.S., Christen, P.: Privacy-preserving record linkage. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Data Mining Knowl. Discov. 3(5), 321–332 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jörg Drechsler or Benjamin Klein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Drechsler, J., Klein, B. (2020). Secure Matrix Computation: A Viable Alternative to Record Linkage?. In: Domingo-Ferrer, J., Muralidhar, K. (eds) Privacy in Statistical Databases. PSD 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57521-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57521-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57520-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57521-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics