Skip to main content

Guiding Socio-Technical Reflection of Ethical Principles in TEL Software Development: The SREP Framework

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education (EC-TEL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12315))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In society and politics, there is a rising interest in considering ethical principles in technological innovation, especially in the intersection of education and technology. We propose a first iteration of a theory-derived framework to analyze ethical issues in technology-enhanced learning (TEL) software development. The framework understands ethical issues as an expression of the overall socio-technical system that are rooted in the interactions of human actors with technology, so-called socio-technical interactions (STIs). For guiding ethical reflection, the framework helps to explicate this human involvement, and to elicit discussions of ethical principles on these STIs. Prompts in the form of reflection questions can be inferred to reflect on the technology functionality from relevant human perspectives, and in relation to a list of fundamental ethical principles. We illustrate the framework and discuss its implications for TEL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cadwalladr, C., Graham-Harrison, E.: Revealed: 50 million Facebook profiles harvested for Cambridge Analytica in major data breach (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jobin, A., Ienca, M., Vayena, E.: The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines. Nat. Mach. Intell. 1, 389–399 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0088-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Saslow, K.: Why EU will find it difficult to legislate on AI. https://euobserver.com/opinion/147346. Accessed 13 Mar 2020

  4. Mulvenna, M., Boger, J., Bond, R.: Ethical by design. In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017 - ECCE 2017, pp. 51–54. ACM Press, New York (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3121283.3121300

  5. Lee, E.A., Gans, N., Grohman, M., Tacca, M., Brown, M.J.: Guiding engineering student teams’ ethics discussions with peer advising. Sci. Eng. Ethics 26(3), 1743–1769 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00212-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Imenda, S.: Is there a conceptual difference between theoretical and conceptual frameworks? J. Soc. Sci. 38, 185–189 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ropohl, G.: Philosophy of socio-technical systems. Techné Res. Philos. Technol. 4, 186–194 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kvan, T.: Collaborative design: what is it? Autom. Constr. 9, 409–415 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-5805(99)00025-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, F., Hannafin, M.J.: Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments. Educ. Technol. Res. Dev. 53, 5–23 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02504682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dennerlein, S.M., Tomberg, V., Treasure-Jones, T., Theiler, D., Lindstaedt, S., Ley, T.: Co-designing tools for workplace learning: a method for analysing and tracing the appropriation of affordances in design-based research. Inf. Learn. Sci. 121(3/4), 175–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-09-2019-0093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Boud, D., Garrick, J.: Understanding Learning at Work (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Krogstie, B.R., Prilla, M., Pammer, V.: Understanding and supporting reflective learning processes in the workplace: the CSRL model. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds.) EC-TEL 2013. LNCS, vol. 8095, pp. 151–164. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_13

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Dennerlein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dennerlein, S., Wolf-Brenner, C., Gutounig, R., Schweiger, S., Pammer-Schindler, V. (2020). Guiding Socio-Technical Reflection of Ethical Principles in TEL Software Development: The SREP Framework. In: Alario-Hoyos, C., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Scheffel, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Dennerlein, S.M. (eds) Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education. EC-TEL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57716-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57717-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics