Skip to main content

Assessing Teacher’s Discourse Effect on Students’ Learning: A Keyword Centrality Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education (EC-TEL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12315))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The way that content-related keywords co-occur along a lesson seems to play an important role in concept understanding and, therefore, in students’ performance. Thus, network-like structures have been used to represent and summarize conceptual knowledge, particularly in science areas. Previous work has automated the process of producing concept networks, computed different properties of these networks, and studied the correlation of these properties with students’ achievement. This work presents an automated analysis of teachers’ concept graphs, the distribution of relevance amongst content-related keywords and how this affects students’ achievement. Particularly, we automatically extracted concept networks from transcriptions of 25 physics classes with 327 students and compute three centrality measures (CMs): PageRank, Diffusion centrality, and Katz centrality. Next, we study the relation between CMs and students’ performance using multilevel analysis. Results show that PageRank and Katz centrality significantly explain around 75% of the variance between different classes. Furthermore, the overall explained variance increased from 16% to 22% when including keyword centralities of teacher’s discourse as class-level variables. This paper shows a useful, low-cost tool for teachers to analyze and learn about how they orchestrate content-related keywords along with their speech.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Scott, P., Mortimer, E., Ametller, J.: Pedagogical link-making: a fundamental aspect of teaching and learning scientific conceptual knowledge. Stud. Sci. Educ. 47(1), 3–36 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Novak, J.D., Gowin, D.B.: Learning How to Learn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Su, C.Y., Wang, T.I.: Construction and analysis of educational assessments using knowledge maps with weight appraisal of concepts. Comput. Educ. 55(3), 1300–1311 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Caballero, D., Pikkarainen, T., Viiri, J., Araya, R., Espinoza, C.: Automatic network analysis of physics teacher talk. In: European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) 13th Conference

    Google Scholar 

  5. Liu, J., Cohen, J.: Measuring Teaching Practices at Scale: A Novel Application of Text-as-Data Methods (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Koponen, I.T., Pehkonen, M.: Coherent knowledge structures of physics represented as concept networks in teacher education. Sci. Educ. 19(3), 259–282 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fischer, H.E., Labudde, P., Neumann, K., Viiri, J.: Quality of instruction in physics. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland. Waxmann, Munster (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helaakoski, J., Viiri, J.: Content and content structure of physics lessons and students’ learning gains. In: Fischer, H.E., Labudde, P., Neumann, K., Viiri, J. (eds.) Quality of Instruction in Physics, pp. 93–110. Comparing Finland, Germany and Switzerland, Waxmann, Münster (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tekijät, et al.: Automatic visualization of concept networks in classrooms: quantitative measures. Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association (FMSERA) journal (2019). (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Page, L., Brin, S., Motwani, R., Winograd, T.: The pagerank citation ranking: Bringing order to the web. Stanford InfoLab (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Banerjee, A., Chandrasekhar, A.G., Duflo, E., Jackson, M.O.: The diffusion of microfinance. Science 341(6144), 1236498 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Katz, L.: A new status index derived from sociometric analysis. Psychometrika 18(1), 39–43 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kronholm, H., Caballero, D., Araya, R., Viiri, J.: A smartphone application for ASR and observation of classroom interactions. In: Finnish Mathematics and Science Education Research Association (FMSERA) Annual Symposium (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geller, C., Neumann, K., Boone, W.J., Fischer, H.E.: What makes the finnish different in science? assessing and comparing students’ science learning in three countries. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 36(18), 3042–3066 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gurría, A.: PISA 2015 resultados clave. Francia: OECD (2016). https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus-ESP.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 2020

  16. Van Ewijk, R., Sleegers, P.: The effect of peer socioeconomic status on student achievement: a meta-analysis. Educ. Res. Rev. 5(2), 134–150 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sirin, S.R.: Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: a meta-analytic review of research. Rev. Educ. Res. 75(3), 417–453 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tibshirani, R.: Regression Shrinkage and selection via the Lasso. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B (Methodological) 58(1), 267–288 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller, R.G.: The jackknife-a review. Biometrika 61(1), 1–15 (1974)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Du, J., Xu, J., Fan, X.: Factors affecting online groupwork interest: a multilevel analysis. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 49(4), 481–499 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. FAQ: What are pseudo R-squareds? UCLA: Statistical Consulting Group. https://stats.idre.ucla.edu/other/mult-pkg/faq/general/faq-what-are-pseudo-r-squareds/. Accessed 18 Mar 2020

  22. Finch, W.H., Bolin, J.E., Kelley, K.: Multilevel Modeling Using R. CRC Press, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nakagawa, S., Johnson, P.C., Schielzeth, H.: The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J. R. Soc. Interface 14(134), 20170213 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Support from ANID/PIA/Basal Funds for Centers of Excellence FB0003 and ANID-FONDECYT grant N° 3180590 are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danner Schlotterbeck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Schlotterbeck, D., Araya, R., Caballero, D., Jimenez, A., Lehesvuori, S., Viiri, J. (2020). Assessing Teacher’s Discourse Effect on Students’ Learning: A Keyword Centrality Approach. In: Alario-Hoyos, C., Rodríguez-Triana, M.J., Scheffel, M., Arnedillo-Sánchez, I., Dennerlein, S.M. (eds) Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education. EC-TEL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57717-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57716-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57717-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics