Skip to main content

Abstract

The ability to understand why a particular robot behavior was triggered is a cornerstone for having human-acceptable social robots. Every robot action should be able to be explained and audited, expected and unexpected robot behaviors should generate a fingerprint showing the components and events that produce them. This research proposes a three-dimensional model for accountability in autonomous robots. The model shows three different elements that deal with the different levels of information, from low-level such as logging to a high level, such as robot behavior. The model proposes three different approaches of visualization, one on command line and two using GUI. The three-level system allows a better understanding of robot behaviors and simplifies the mapping of observable behaviors with accountable information.

The research described in this article has been partially funded by addendum 4 to the framework convention between the University of León and Instituto Nacional de Ciberseguridad (INCIBE).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://youtu.be/VoYLna-S-oI.

References

  1. Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., Auer, S.: A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov. Inf. Q. 32(4), 399–418 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bihlmaier, A., Hadlich, M., Wörn, H.: Advanced ROS Network Introspection (ARNI), pp. 651–670. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Butin, D., Chicote, M., Le Métayer, D.: Log design for accountability. In: 2013 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, pp. 1–7. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carolan, L.: Open data, transparency and accountability: topic guide. GSDRC, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bohren, J.: SMACH Viewer (2018). http://wiki.ros.org/smach_viewer. Accessed 29 Aug 2019

  6. Kapitanovsky, A., Maimon, O.: Robot programming system for assembly: conceptual graph-based approach. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 8(1), 35–62 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lima, O., Ventura, R.: ICAPS-2018 Tutorial on Integrating Classical Planning and Mobile Service Robots using ROSPlan (2018). https://github.com/oscar-lima/rosplan_tutorial. Accessed 29 Aug 2019

  8. Manso, L.J., Bustos, P., Bachiller, P., Núñez, P.: A perception-aware architecture for autonomous robots. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 12(12), 174 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Oreback, A.: Components in intelligent robotics. MRTC report ISSN, pp. 1404–3041 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Quigley, M., Conley, K., Gerkey, B., Faust, J., Foote, T., Leibs, J., Wheeler, R., Ng, A.Y.: ROS: an open-source robot operating system. In: ICRA Workshop on Open Source Software, Kobe, Japan, vol. 3, p. 5 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodríguez, V., Rodríguez, F.J., Matellán, V.: Localization issues in the design of a humanoid goalkeeper for the RoboCup SPL using BICA. In: 11th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications, pp. 1152–1157 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rodríguez-Lera, F.J., Guerrero-Higueras, Á.M., Martín-Rico, F., Gines, J., Sierra, J.F.G., Matellán-Olivera, V.: Adapting ROS logs to facilitate transparency and accountability in service robotics. In: Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference, pp. 587–598. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schwarz, M.: Rosmon (2018). http://wiki.ros.org/rosmon. Accessed 29 Aug 2019

  14. Shishkov, B., Hristozov, S., Janssen, M., van den Hoven, J.: Drones in land border missions: benefits and accountability concerns. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Telecommunications and Remote Sensing, pp. 77–86 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas, D., Scholz, D., Kruse, T., Blasdel, A., Saito, I.: RQT common plugins (2013). http://wiki.ros.org/rqt_common_plugins. Accessed 29 Aug 2019

  16. Van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B.: Handbook of Knowledge Representation, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Willow Garage, Inc., Maye, J., Kaestner, R.: ROS-system-monitor (2015). https://github.com/ethz-asl/ros-system-monitor. Accessed 29 Aug 2019

  18. Xiao, Y.: Flow-net methodology for accountability in wireless networks. IEEE Netw. 23(5), 30–37 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Xiao, Z., Kathiresshan, N., Xiao, Y.: A survey of accountability in computer networks and distributed systems. Secur. Commun. Netw. 9(4), 290–315 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yoon, M.K., Shao, Z.: ADLP: accountable data logging protocol for publish-subscribe communication systems. In: 2019 IEEE 39th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS), pp. 1149–1160. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zender, H., Mozos, O.M., Jensfelt, P., Kruijff, G.J., Burgard, W.: Conceptual spatial representations for indoor mobile robots. Robot. Auton. Syst. 56(6), 493–502 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Javier Rodríguez-Lera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rodríguez-Lera, F.J., González Santamarta, M.Á., Guerrero, Á.M., Martí­n, F., Matellán, V. (2021). Traceability and Accountability in Autonomous Agents. In: Herrero, Á., Cambra, C., Urda, D., Sedano, J., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems (CISIS 2020). CISIS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1267. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57805-3_28

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics