Skip to main content

The Order of the Factors DOES Alter the Product: Cyber Resilience Policies’ Implementation Order

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems (CISIS 2020) (CISIS 2019)

Abstract

Cyber resilience can help companies today thrive despite the adverse cyber threat environment. This discipline adds to cybersecurity the mindset of preparing for the unexpected and prioritizing business continuity over simply protecting systems and assets. However, cyber resilience operationalization requires knowledge and investing into its multiple domains and policies. Moreover, the only aids companies have for the operationalization of cyber resilience are frameworks that list the domains and policies, but do not guide them on an effective order in which to implement them. These aids will often require companies to select the set of policies that suits them and decide the order of implementation on their own. This selection process will require resources for acquiring the required knowledge on top of the resources for the implementation of the policies. Since most companies have limited resources and to minimize the investment required for cyber resilience operationalization, this study proposes an implementation order for cyber resilience policies based on the current literature and the iterative evaluation by six experts. This implementation order could potentially help companies operationalize cyber resilience effectively and diminish the investment needed to do so.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Allianz Global Corporate & Speciality: Allianz Risk Barometer: Top Business Risks for 2019, Munich, Germany (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bissel, K., Ponemon, L.: Ninth Annual Cost of Cybercrime Study Unlocking the Value of Improved Cybersecurity Protection (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Schneier, B.: The future of incident response. IEEE Secur. Priv. 12, 96–97 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Deutscher, S.A., Bohmayr, W., Asen, A.: Building a Cyberresilient Organization, Boston, MA, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Goldman, H., McQuaid, R., Picciotto, J.: Cyber resilience for mission assurance. In: 2011 International Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security, HST 2011, pp. 236–241 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2011.6107877

  6. Björk, F., Henkel, M., Stirna, J., Zdravkovic, J.: Cyber Resilience – Fundamentals for a Definition. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol. 353, pp. III–IV (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1

  7. World Economic Forum: The Global Risks Report 2018, Geneva, Switzerland, 13th edn. (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carías, J., Labaka, L., Sarriegi, J., Hernantes, J.: Defining a cyber resilience investment strategy in an industrial Internet of Things context. Sensors 19, 138 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/s19010138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Center for Internet Security (CIS): CIS Controls V 7.1, NY, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Carnegie Mellon University (2016) Cyber Resilience Review (CRR). Department of Home Security. https://www.us-cert.gov/ccubedvp/assessments. Accessed 6 Feb 2018

  11. Cranor, L.F.: A framework for reasoning about the human in the loop. In: Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Usability, Psychology, and Security, pp 1:1–1:15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Millaire, P., Sathe, A., Thielen, P.: What All Cyber Criminals Know: Small & Midsize Businesses With Little or No Cybersecurity Are Ideal Targets, NJ, USA (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huelsman, T., Peasley, S.: Cyber risk in advanced manufacturing, VA, USA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ben-Asher, N., Gonzalez, C.: Effects of cyber security knowledge on attack detection. Comput. Hum. Behav. 48, 51–61 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. NIST: Framework for Improving Critical Infrastructure Cybersecurity v 1.1, Gaithersburg, MD, USA (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. MITRE: Cyber Resiliency Metrics, VA, USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28, 75 (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/25148625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24, 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Caralli, R.A., Stevens, J.F., Young, L.R., Wilson, W.R.: Introducing OCTAVE Allegro: Improving the Information Security Risk Assessment Process, PA, USA (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Organization for Standarization (ISO): Information technology — Security techniques — Code of practice for information security management Technologies (ISO 27002:2005), Geneva, Switzerland (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Caralli, R.A., Allen, J.H., White, D.W., et al.: CERT Resilience Management Model, Version 1 2, Pittsburgh, PA (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the support from the Basque Government project ELKARTEK 2018 KK-2018/00076 and project ELKARTEK 2019 KK-2019/00072.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Francisco Carias .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Carias, J.F., Borges, M.R.S., Labaka, L., Arrizabalaga, S., Hernantes, J. (2021). The Order of the Factors DOES Alter the Product: Cyber Resilience Policies’ Implementation Order. In: Herrero, Á., Cambra, C., Urda, D., Sedano, J., Quintián, H., Corchado, E. (eds) 13th International Conference on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems (CISIS 2020). CISIS 2019. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1267. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57805-3_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics