Abstract
The aim of this study is to understand what makes a landmark more salient and to explore whether assessments of saliency vary between experts and non-experts. We hypothesize that non-experts’ saliency judgments will agree with those of the experts. Secondly, we hypothesize that not only visual characteristics but also structural characteristics make landmarks salient and that the size and visibility of objects are important for them to be considered as salient. To test our hypotheses, an online navigation game, Sea Hero Quest (SHQ), was used and two levels of the game were selected as the case study. The characteristics of these levels were evaluated by non-experts and experts in the field. Our results suggest that both visual and structural characteristics of landmarks make them more salient. We also discovered that experts’ saliency evaluations are mostly consistent with non-experts’.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Downs, R.M., Stea, D.: Cognitive maps and spatial behavior: process and products. In: The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation. pp. 8–26. Wiley (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch41
Michon, P.-E., Denis, M.: When and why are visual landmarks used in giving directions? In: Montello, D.R. (ed.) Spatial Information Theory, pp. 292–305. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)
Philbeck, J.W., O’Leary, S.: Remembered landmarks enhance the precision of path integration. Psicologica 26, 7–24 (2005)
Couclelis, H., Golledge, R.G., Gale, N., Tobler, W.: Exploring the anchor-point hypothesis of spatial cognition. J. Environ. Psychol. 7, 99–122 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(87)80020-8
Tlauka, M., Wilson, P.N.: The effect of landmarks on route-learning in a computer-simulated environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 14, 305–313 (1994)
Sorrows, M.E., Hirtle, S.C.: The nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: International Conference on Spatial Information Theory. pp. 37–50. Springer, Heidelberg (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48384-5
Caduff, D., Timpf, S.: On the assessment of landmark salience for human navigation. Cogn. Process. 9, 249–267 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-007-0199-2
Peters, D., Wu, Y., Winter, S.: Testing landmark identification theories in virtual environments. In: Hölscher, C., Shipley, T.F., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., Bateman, J.A., Newcombe, N.S. (eds.) Spatial Cognition VII, pp. 54–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Stankiewicz, B.J., Kalia, A.A.: Acquistion of structural versus object landmark knowledge. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 33, 378–390 (2007)
Winter, S., Raubal, M., Nothegger, C.: Focalizing measures of salience for wayfinding. In: Map-based Mobile Services: Theories, Methods and Implementations. pp. 125–139. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-26982-7_9
Albrecht, R., von Stuelpnagel, R.: Memory for salient landmarks: empirical findings and a cognitive model. In: Creem-Regehr, S., Schöning, J., Klippel, A. (eds.) Spatial Cognition 2018. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 11034, pp. 311–325. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96385-3_21
Hölscher, C., Dalton, R.C.: Comprehension of layout complexity: Effects of architectural expertise and mode of presentation. In: Gero, J.S., Goel, A.K. (eds.) Design Computing and Cognition 2008, pp. 159–178. Springer, Dordrecht (2008)
Tenbrink, T., Hoelscher, C., Tsigaridi, D., Dalton, R.: Cognition and communication in architectural design. In: Montello, D., Grossner, K., Janelle, D. (eds.) Space in Mind: Concepts for Spatial Learning and Education, pp. 263–280. The MIT Press, United States (2014). https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9811.003.0014
Cheng, S.-Y.: Suburban landmarks in north arlington: perceptions of experts and non-experts (2009)
Coutrot, A., et al.: Global determinants of navigation ability. Curr. Biol. 28, 2861–2866.e4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2018.06.009
Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)
Yesiltepe, D., et al.: Usage of landmarks in virtual environments for wayfinding: research on the influence of global landmarks. In: 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, pp. 220-1–220-10, Beijing (2019)
Raubal, M., Winter, S.: Enriching wayfinding instructions with local landmarks. In: Egenhofer, M.J., Mark, D.M. (eds.) GIScience 2002. LNCS, vol. 2478, pp. 243–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45799-2_17
Sadeghian, P., Kantardzic, M.: The new generation of automatic landmark detection systems: challenges and guidelines. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 8, 252–287 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875860802039257
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Saskia Kuliga for her suggestions about the survey.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yesiltepe, D., Dalton, R.C., Ozbil Torun, A., Coutrot, A., Hornberger, M., Spiers, H. (2020). A Study on Visual and Structural Characteristics of Landmarks and Experts’ and Non-experts’ Evaluations. In: Šķilters, J., Newcombe, N., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition XII. Spatial Cognition 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57982-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57983-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)