Abstract
Landmarks are key elements in the wayfinding process. The impact of global and local landmarks in wayfinding has been explored by many researchers and a large body of evidence around landmarks and landmark usage has been discussed [1, 2]. However, there is one aspect of landmark research that is still not clear: when can a landmark be termed “global” as opposed to when can it be classified as being “local”? Is it necessary for a global landmark to be seen from any/every location in a setting [3], or is it acceptable if it is seen merely from many angles and many locations (and if so, how many?) [4]? At what point does a local landmark become a global landmark? Where is the threshold between these? In this study, our goal is to redefine global and local landmarks based on the visibility of landmarks along routes. For this purpose, we used Sea Hero Quest (an online game) and explored landmark visibility in virtual game environments to find if there is a threshold between local/global landmarks. Participants were asked to navigate a boat and to find goal locations in river/waterway environments. Meanwhile, the visibility of landmarks from the perspective of the game-player was recorded. This study contributes to the literature by demonstrating a new and innovative method of using landmark visibility to reclassify global and local landmarks.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
By conditions, we refer 1. weather (whether it is clear or foggy), 2. map (clear or obscured), 3.environment (5 different environments were designed for the game), and 4. landmark saliency (visually salient landmarks at accessible points –easy landmarks- or visually salient or less salient objects at segregated points –hard landmarks-) conditions. All these conditions were pre-defined by the researchers.
References
Meilinger, T., Schulte-Pelkum, J., Frankenstein, J., Berger, D., Bülthoff, H.H.: Global landmarks do not necessarily improve spatial performance in addition to bodily self-movement cues when learning a large-scale virtual environment. In: Imura, M., Figueroa, P., and Mohler, B. (eds.) International Conference on Artificial Reality and Telexistence Eurographics Symposium on Virtual Environments (2015)
Ruddle, R.A., Volkova, E., Mohler, B., Bülthoff, H.H.: The effect of landmark and body-based sensory information on route knowledge. Mem. Cognit. 39, 686–699 (2011). https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-010-0054-z
Castelli, L., Latini Corazzini, L., Geminiani, G.C.: Spatial navigation in large-scale virtual environments: gender differences in survey tasks. Comput. Human Behav. 24, 1643–1667 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.06.005
Lynch, K.: The Image of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge (1960)
Montello, D.R.: Navigation. In: The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking, pp. 257–294. Cambridge University Press, New York (2005)
Montello, D.R., Sas, C.: Human factors of wayfinding in navigation (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4073(74)90072-7
Siegel, A.W., White, S.H.: The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. Adv. Child Dev. Behav. 10, 9–55 (1975). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)60007-5
Steck, S.D., Mallot, H.A.: The role of global and local landmarks in virtual environment navigation. Presence Teleoper. Virt. Environ. 9, 69–83 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566628
Lin, C.-T., et al.: Gender differences in wayfinding in virtual environments with global or local landmarks. J. Environ. Psychol. 32, 89–96 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JENVP.2011.12.004
Credé, S., Thrash, T., Hölscher, C., Fabrikant, S.I.: The acquisition of survey knowledge for local and global landmark configurations under time pressure. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 19, 190–219 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2019.1569016
Meilinger, T., Riecke, B.E., Bülthoff, H.H.: Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 67, 542–569 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.821145
Schwering, A., Krukar, J., Li, R., Anacta, V.J., Fuest, S.: Wayfinding through orientation. Spat. Cogn. Comput. 17, 273–303 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/13875868.2017.1322597
Schwering, A., Li, R., Anacta, V.J.A.: Orientation information in different forms of route instructions. In: Short Paper Proceedings of the 16th AGILE Conference on Geographic Information Science, Leuven, Belgium (2013)
Li, H., Corey, R.R., Giudice, U., Giudice, N.A.: Assessment of visualization interfaces for assisting the development of multi-level cognitive maps. In: Schmorrow, D.D.D., Fidopiastis, C.M.M. (eds.) AC 2016. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 9744, pp. 308–321. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39952-2_30
Li, R., Korda, A., Radtke, M., Schwering, A.: Visualising distant off-screen landmarks on mobile devices to support spatial orientation. J. Locat. Based Serv. 8, 166–178 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/17489725.2014.978825
Coutrot, A., et al.: Global determinants of navigation ability. Curr. Biol. 28, 2861–2866.e4 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CUB.2018.06.009
Emo, B., Hölscher, C., Wiener, J.M., Conroy Dalton, R.: Wayfinding and spatial configuration: evidence from street corners. In: Eighth International Space Syntax Symposium, pp. 8098:1–8089:16. Santiago de Chile (2012)
Grzeschik, R., Conroy-Dalton, R., Innes, A., Shanker, S., Wiener, J.M.: The contribution of visual attention and declining verbal memory abilities to age-related route learning deficits. Cognition 187, 50–61 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.02.012
Yesiltepe, D., et al.: Usage of landmarks in virtual environments for wayfinding: research on the influence of global landmarks. In: 12th International Space Syntax Symposium, pp. 220–1, 220–10. Beijing (2019)
Evans, G.W., Skorpanich, M.A., Bryant, K.J., Bresolin, B.: The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition. J. Environ. Psychol. 4, 323–335 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(84)80003-1
Kelsey, S.R.: The “what” and “where” of Landmarks: Impact on Way-finding and Spatial Knowledge (2009)
Schwering, A., Li, R., Anacta, V.J.A.: The use of local and global landmarks across scales and modes of transportation in verbal route instructions. In: Poster session presented at the 2014 spatial cognition conference. Bremen (2014)
Gardony, A., Brunyé, T.T., Mahoney, C.R., Taylor, H.A.: Affective states influence spatial cue utilization during navigation. Presence Teleoper. Virt. Environ. 20, 223–240 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1162/PRES_a_00046
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Yesiltepe, D. et al. (2020). Redefining Global and Local Landmarks: When Does a Landmark Stop Being Local and Become a Global One?. In: Šķilters, J., Newcombe, N., Uttal, D. (eds) Spatial Cognition XII. Spatial Cognition 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12162. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-57983-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-57982-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-57983-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)