Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Question Answering When Knowledge Bases are Incomplete

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction (CLEF 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12260))

Abstract

While systems for question answering over knowledge bases (KB) continue to progress, real world usage requires systems that are robust to incomplete KBs. Dependence on the closed world assumption is highly problematic, as in many practical cases the information is constantly evolving and KBs cannot keep up. In this paper we formalize a typology of missing information in knowledge bases, and present a dataset based on the Spider KB question answering dataset, where we deliberately remove information from several knowledge bases, in this case implemented as relational databases (The dataset and the code to reproduce experiments are available at https://github.com/camillepradel/IDK.). Our dataset, called IDK (Incomplete Data in Knowledge base question answering), allows to perform studies on how to detect and recover from such cases. The analysis shows that simple baselines fail to detect most of the unanswerable questions.

This work has been supported by ERA-Net CHIST-ERA LIHLITH Project funded by the Agencia Estatal de Investigación (AEI, Spain) projects PCIN-2017-118/AEI and PCIN-2017-085/AEI, the Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR, France) projects ANR-17-CHR2-0001-03 and ANR-17-CHR2-0001-04, and the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF, Switzerland) project 20CH21 174237.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.w3.org/standards/semanticweb/.

  2. 2.

    None type corresponds to RDF plain literals: https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#dfn-plain-literal.

  3. 3.

    Plus domain and range properties, and labels language tags we did not include in our definition for the sake of simplicity.

  4. 4.

    We used Magnitude [12] in order to query the embeddings in a way that is robust to minor morphological word differences.

References

  1. Artzi, Y., Zettlemoyer, L.: Weakly supervised learning of semantic parsers for mapping instructions to actions. Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguist. 1, 49–62 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Berant, J., Chou, A., Frostig, R., Liang, P.: Semantic parsing on Freebase from question-answer pairs. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Seattle, Washington, USA, pp. 1533–1544. Association for Computational Linguistics, October 2013. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D13-1160

  3. Bogin, B., Gardner, M., Berant, J.: Representing schema structure with graph neural networks for text-to-SQL parsing. In: ACL (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chebotko, A., Lu, S., Fotouhi, F.: Semantics preserving SPARQL-to-SQL translation. Data Knowl. Eng. 68, 973–1000 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, (Long and Short Papers), Minneapolis, Minnesota, vol. 1, pp. 4171–4186. Association for Computational Linguistics, June 2019. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N19-1423

  6. Guo, J., et al.: Towards complex text-to-SQL in cross-domain database with intermediate representation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.08205 (2019). Version 2

  7. Hixon, B., Clark, P., Hajishirzi, H.: Learning knowledge graphs for question answering through conversational dialog. In: Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Denver, Colorado, pp. 851–861. Association for Computational Linguistics, May–June 2015. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/N15-1086. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N15-1086

  8. Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D.S., Zettlemoyer, L.: Triviaqa: a large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2017

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lopez, V., Unger, C., Cimiano, P., Motta, E.: Evaluating question answering over linked data. J. Web Semant. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.websem.2013.05.006

  10. Mikolov, T., Grave, E., Bojanowski, P., Puhrsch, C., Joulin, A.: Advances in pre-training distributed word representations. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2018), Miyazaki, Japan. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), May 2018. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/L18-1008

  11. Pasupat, P., Liang, P.: Compositional semantic parsing on semi-structured tables. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), Beijing, China, pp. 1470–1480. Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2015. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/P15-1142. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P15-1142

  12. Patel, A., Sands, A., Callison-Burch, C., Apidianaki, M.: Magnitude: a fast, efficient universal vector embedding utility package. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 120–126. Association for Computational Linguistics, November 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-2021. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-2021

  13. Peñas, A., Veron, M., Pradel, C., Otegi, A., Echegoyen, G., Rodrigo, A.: Continuous learning for question answering. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Spoken Dialog Systems (IWSDS 2019) - DSLL Special Session (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Price, P.J.: Evaluation of spoken language systems: the ATIS domain. In: Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Hidden Valley, Pennsylvania, 24–27 June 1990 (1990). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/H90-1020

  15. Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., Liang, P.: Know what you don’t know: unanswerable questions for SQuAD. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 784–789. Association for Computational Linguistics, July 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-2124. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-2124

  16. Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., Liang, P.: SQuAD: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Austin, Texas, pp. 2383–2392. Association for Computational Linguistics, November 2016. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D16-1264. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D16-1264

  17. Soussi, N., Bahaj, M.: Semantics preserving SQL-to-SPARQL query translation for nested right and left outer join. J. Appl. Res. Technol. 15(5), 504–512 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, T., et al.: CoSQL: a conversational text-to-SQL challenge towards cross-domain natural language interfaces to databases. In: Proceedings of EMNLP 2019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yu, T., et al.: Spider: a large-scale human-labeled dataset for complex and cross-domain semantic parsing and text-to-SQL task. In: Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 3911–3921. Association for Computational Linguistics, October–November 2018. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/D18-1425. https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/D18-1425

  20. Yu, T., et al.: SParC: cross-domain semantic parsing in context. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zelle, J.M., Mooney, R.J.: Learning to parse database queries using inductive logic programming. In: Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, AAAI 1996, vol. 2, pp. 1050–1055. AAAI Press (1996). http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1864519.1864543

  22. Zhong, V., Xiong, C., Socher, R.: Seq2SQL: generating structured queries from natural language using reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.00103 (2017)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Synapse Développement, Toulouse, France

    Camille Pradel & Damien Sileo

  2. Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distanca, Madrid, Spain

    Álvaro Rodrigo & Anselmo Peñas

  3. Ixa NLP Group, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain

    Eneko Agirre

Authors
  1. Camille Pradel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Damien Sileo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Álvaro Rodrigo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anselmo Peñas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Eneko Agirre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille Pradel .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Democritus University of Thrace, Xanthi, Greece

    Avi Arampatzis

  2. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Evangelos Kanoulas

  3. Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Theodora Tsikrika

  4. Information Technologies Institute, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Stefanos Vrochidis

  5. Faculty of Library, Information and Media Science, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan

    Hideo Joho

  6. Department of Computer Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark

    Christina Lioma

  7. Brown University, Providence, RI, USA

    Carsten Eickhoff

  8. LIMSI-CNRS, Orsay, France

    Aurélie Névéol

  9. Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy

    Linda Cappellato

  10. Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padua, Italy

    Nicola Ferro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pradel, C., Sileo, D., Rodrigo, Á., Peñas, A., Agirre, E. (2020). Question Answering When Knowledge Bases are Incomplete. In: Arampatzis, A., et al. Experimental IR Meets Multilinguality, Multimodality, and Interaction. CLEF 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12260. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58219-7_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58218-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58219-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation