Skip to main content

Self-adaptive Container Deployment in the Fog: A Survey

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Algorithmic Aspects of Cloud Computing (ALGOCLOUD 2019)

Abstract

The fast increasing presence of Internet-of-Things and fog computing resources exposes new challenges due to heterogeneity and non-negligible network delays among resources as well as the dynamism of operating conditions. Such a variable computing environment leads the applications to adopt an elastic and decentralized execution. To simplify the application deployment and run-time management, containers are widely used nowadays. The deployment of a container-based application over a geo-distributed computing infrastructure is a key task that has a significant impact on the application non-functional requirements (e.g., performance, security, cost). In this survey, we first develop a taxonomy based on the goals, the scope, the actions, and the methodologies considered to adapt at run-time the application deployment. Then, we use it to classify some of the existing research results. Finally, we identify some open challenges that arise for the application deployment in the fog. In literature, we can find many different approaches for adapting the containers deployment, each tailored for optimizing a specific objective, such as the application response time, its deployment cost, or the efficient utilization of the available computing resources. However, although several solutions for deploying containers exist, those explicitly considering the distinctive features of fog computing are at the early stages: indeed, existing solutions scale containers without considering their placement, or do not consider the heterogeneity, the geographic distribution, and mobility of fog resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://docs.docker.com/engine/swarm/.

  2. 2.

    http://mesos.apache.org.

  3. 3.

    https://kubernetes.io.

References

  1. Abdelbaky, M., Diaz-Montes, J., Parashar, M., Unuvar, M., Steinder, M.: Docker containers across multiple clouds and data centers. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM UCC 2015, pp. 368–371 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/UCC.2015.58

  2. Addya, S.K., Turuk, A.K., Sahoo, B., Sarkar, M., Biswash, S.K.: Simulated annealing based VM placement strategy to maximize the profit for cloud service providers. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int J. 20(4), 1249–1259 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Al-Dhuraibi, Y., Paraiso, F., Djarallah, N., Merle, P.: Autonomic vertical elasticity of Docker containers with ElasticDocker. In: Proceedings of IEEE CLOUD 2017, pp. 472–479 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2017.67

  4. Al-Dhuraibi, Y., Paraiso, F., Djarallah, N., Merle, P.: Elasticity in cloud computing: state of the art and research challenges. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 11, 430–447 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2017.2711009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alam, M.G.R., Hassan, M.M., Uddin, M.Z., Almogren, A., Fortino, G.: Autonomic computation offloading in mobile edge for IoT applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 90, 149–157 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.07.050

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ali-Eldin, A., Tordsson, J., Elmroth, E.: An adaptive hybrid elasticity controller for cloud infrastructures. In: Proceedings of IEEE NOMS 2012, pp. 204–212 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Arabnejad, H., Pahl, C., Jamshidi, P., Estrada, G.: A comparison of reinforcement learning techniques for fuzzy cloud auto-scaling. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM CCGrid 2017, pp. 64–73 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/CCGRID.2017.15

  8. Arkian, H.R., Diyanat, A., Pourkhalili, A.: MIST: fog-based data analytics scheme with cost-efficient resource provisioning for IoT crowdsensing applications. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 82, 152–165 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2017.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Asnaghi, A., Ferroni, M., Santambrogio, M.D.: DockerCap: a software-level power capping orchestrator for Docker containers. In: Proceedings of IEEE EUC 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Baresi, L., Guinea, S., Leva, A., Quattrocchi, G.: A discrete-time feedback controller for containerized cloud applications. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGSOFT FSE 2016, pp. 217–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2950290.2950328

  11. Barna, C., Khazaei, H., Fokaefs, M., Litoiu, M.: Delivering elastic containerized cloud applications to enable DevOps. In: Proceedings of SEAMS 2017, pp. 65–75 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bellavista, P., Zanni, A.: Feasibility of fog computing deployment based on Docker containerization over RaspberryPi. In: Proceedings of ICDCN 2017. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bermbach, D., et al.: A research perspective on fog computing. In: Braubach, L., et al. (eds.) ICSOC 2017. LNCS, vol. 10797, pp. 198–210. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91764-1_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Boyd, S., Parikh, N., Chu, E., Peleato, B., Eckstein, J.: Distributed optimization and statistical learning via the alternating direction method of multipliers. Found. Trends Mach. Learn. 3(1), 1–122 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Brogi, A., Forti, S., Guerrero, C., Lera, I.: Meet genetic algorithms in Monte Carlo: optimised placement of multi-service applications in the fog. In: Proceedings of IEEE EDGE 2019, pp. 13–17 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/EDGE.2019.00016

  16. Brogi, A., Forti, S., Guerrero, C., Lera, I.: How to place your apps in the fog: state of the art and open challenges. Softw. Pract. Exp. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Buyya, R., et al.: A manifesto for future generation cloud computing: research directions for the next decade. ACM Comput. Surv. 51(5), 105:1–105:38 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Calheiros, R.N., Ranjan, R., Beloglazov, A., De Rose, C., Buyya, R.: CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw. Pract. Exp. 41(1), 23–50 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Casalicchio, E., Perciballi, V.: Auto-scaling of containers: the impact of relative and absolute metrics. In: Proceedings of IEEE FAS*W 2017, pp. 207–214 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Casalicchio, E.: Container orchestration: a survey. In: Puliafito, A., Trivedi, K.S. (eds.) Systems Modeling: Methodologies and Tools. EICC, pp. 221–235. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-92378-9_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Chang, Z., Zhou, Z., Ristaniemi, T., Niu, Z.: Energy efficient optimization for computation offloading in fog computing system. In: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/GLOCOM.2017.8254207

  22. de Brito, M.S., et al.: A service orchestration architecture for fog-enabled infrastructures. In: Proceedings of FMEC 2017, pp. 127–132. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  23. De Maio, V., Brandic, I.: Multi-objective mobile edge provisioning in small cell clouds. In: Proceedings of ACM/SPEC ICPE 2019, pp. 127–138. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Elliott, D., Otero, C., Ridley, M., Merino, X.: A cloud-agnostic container orchestrator for improving interoperability. In: Proceedings of IEEE CLOUD 2018, pp. 958–961 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2018.00145

  25. Garefalakis, P., Karanasos, K., Pietzuch, P., Suresh, A., Rao, S.: Medea: scheduling of long running applications in shared production clusters. In: Proceedings of EuroSys 2018, pp. 4:1–4:13. ACM (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3190508.3190549

  26. Gedeon, J., Brandherm, F., Egert, R., Grube, T., Mühlhäuser, M.: What the fog? Edge computing revisited: promises, applications and future challenges. IEEE Access 7, 152847–152878 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2948399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Guan, X., Wan, X., Choi, B.Y., Song, S., Zhu, J.: Application oriented dynamic resource allocation for data centers using Docker containers. IEEE Commun. Lett. 21(3), 504–507 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2016.2644658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Guerrero, C., Lera, I., Juiz, C.: Genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization of container allocation in cloud architecture. J. Grid Comput. 16(1), 113–135 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-017-9419-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gupta, H., Vahid Dastjerdi, A., Ghosh, S.K., Buyya, R.: iFogSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of resource management techniques in the internet of things, edge and fog computing environments. Softw. Pract. Exp. 47(9), 1275–1296 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hoque, S., d. Brito, M.S., Willner, A., Keil, O., Magedanz, T.: Towards container orchestration in fog computing infrastructures. In: Proceedings of IEEE COMPSAC 2017, vol. 2, pp. 294–299 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/COMPSAC.2017.248

  31. Horovitz, S., Arian, Y.: Efficient cloud auto-scaling with SLA objective using Q-learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE FiCloud 2018, pp. 85–92 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Huang, Z., Lin, K.J., Yu, S.Y., Hsu, J.Y.J.: Co-locating services in IoT systems to minimize the communication energy cost. J. Innov. Digit. Ecosyst. 1(1), 47–57 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jides.2015.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Javed, A., Heljanko, K., Buda, A., Främling, K.: Cefiot: a fault-tolerant IoT architecture for edge and cloud. In: Proceedings of IEEE WF-IoT 2018, pp. 813–818 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Jawarneh, I.M.A., et al.: Container orchestration engines: a thorough functional and performance comparison. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICC 2019, pp. 1–6 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Kaewkasi, C., Chuenmuneewong, K.: Improvement of container scheduling for Docker using ant colony optimization. In: Proceedings of KST 2017. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kaur, K., Dhand, T., Kumar, N., Zeadally, S.: Container-as-a-service at the edge: trade-off between energy efficiency and service availability at fog nano data centers. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 24(3), 48–56 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kayal, P., Liebeherr, J.: Autonomic service placement in fog computing. In: Proceedings of IEEE WoWMoM 2019, pp. 1–9 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M.: The vision of autonomic computing. IEEE Comput. 36(1), 41–50 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2003.1160055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Khazaei, H., Bannazadeh, H., Leon-Garcia, A.: SAVI-IoT: a self-managing containerized IoT platform. In: Proc. of IEEE FiCloud 2017, pp. 227–234 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Khazaei, H., Ravichandiran, R., Park, B., Bannazadeh, H., Tizghadam, A., Leon-Garcia, A.: Elascale: autoscaling and monitoring as a service. In: Proceedings of CASCON 2017, pp. 234–240 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Kimovski, D., Ijaz, H., Saurabh, N., Prodan, R.: Adaptive nature-inspired fog architecture. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICFEC 2018, pp. 1–8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Liu, L., Chang, Z., Guo, X., Mao, S., Ristaniemi, T.: Multiobjective optimization for computation offloading in fog computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 5(1), 283–294 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2017.2780236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Lopes, M.M., Higashino, W.A., Capretz, M.A., Bittencourt, L.F.: MyiFogSim: a simulator for virtual machine migration in fog computing. In: Proceedings of IEEE/ACM UCC 2017 Companion, pp. 47–52. ACM (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lorido-Botran, T., Miguel-Alonso, J., Lozano, J.A.: A review of auto-scaling techniques for elastic applications in cloud environments. J. Grid Comput. 12(4), 559–592 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10723-014-9314-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mahmud, M., Srirama, S., Ramamohanarao, K., Buyya, R.: Quality of experience (QoE)-aware placement of applications in fog computing environments. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 123, 190–203 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mahmud, R., Kotagiri, R., Buyya, R.: Fog computing: a taxonomy, survey and future directions. In: Di Martino, B., Li, K.-C., Yang, L.T., Esposito, A. (eds.) Internet of Everything. IT, pp. 103–130. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5861-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  47. Mao, Y., Oak, J., Pompili, A., Beer, D., Han, T., Hu, P.: DRAPS: dynamic and resource-aware placement scheme for Docker containers in a heterogeneous cluster. In: Proceedings of IEEE IPCCC 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/PCCC.2017.8280474

  48. Mayer, R., Graser, L., Gupta, H., Saurez, E., Ramachandran, U.: EmuFog: extensible and scalable emulation of large-scale fog computing infrastructures. In: Proceedings of IEEE FWC 2017, pp. 1–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/FWC.2017.8368525

  49. Mennes, R., Spinnewyn, B., Latré, S., Botero, J.F.: GRECO: a distributed genetic algorithm for reliable application placement in hybrid clouds. In: Proceedings of IEEE CloudNet 2016, pp. 14–20 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/CloudNet.2016.45

  50. Mouradian, C., Kianpisheh, S., Abu-Lebdeh, M., Ebrahimnezhad, F., Jahromi, N.T., Glitho, R.H.: Application component placement in NFV-based hybrid cloud/fog systems with mobile fog nodes. IEEE J. Sel. Areas in Commun. 37(5), 1130–1143 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2019.2906790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Mseddi, A., Jaafar, W., Elbiaze, H., Ajib, W.: Joint container placement and task provisioning in dynamic fog computing. IEEE Internet Things J. 6, 10028–10040 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Naas, M.I., Parvedy, P.R., Boukhobza, J., Lemarchand, L.: iFogStor: an IoT data placement strategy for fog infrastructure. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICFEC 2017, pp. 97–104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFEC.2017.15

  53. Nardelli, M., Cardellini, V., Casalicchio, E.: Multi-level elastic deployment of containerized applications in geo-distributed environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE FiCloud 2018, pp. 1–8 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/FiCloud.2018.00009

  54. Nardelli, M., Hochreiner, C., Schulte, S.: Elastic provisioning of virtual machines for container deployment. In: Proceedings of ACM/SPEC ICPE 2017 Companion, pp. 5–10 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3053600.3053602

  55. Netto, H.V., Luiz, A.F., Correia, M., de Oliveira Rech, L., Oliveira, C.P.: Koordinator: a service approach for replicating Docker containers in Kubernetes. In: Proceedings of IEEE ISCC 2018, pp. 58–63 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Nouri, S.M.R., Li, H., Venugopal, S., Guo, W., He, M., Tian, W.: Autonomic decentralized elasticity based on a reinforcement learning controller for cloud applications. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 94, 765–780 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Ongaro, D., Ousterhout, J.: In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In: Proceedings of USENIX ATC 2014, pp. 305–319 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Ouyang, T., Zhou, Z., Chen, X.: Follow me at the edge: mobility-aware dynamic service placement for mobile edge computing. IEEE J. Sel. Area Comm. 36(10), 2333–2345 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSAC.2018.2869954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Piraghaj, S.F., Dastjerdi, A.V., Calheiros, R.N., Buyya, R.: ContainerCloudSim: an environment for modeling and simulation of containers in cloud data centers. Softw. Pract. Exp. 47(4), 505–521 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Puliafito, C., Mingozzi, E., Longo, F., Puliafito, A., Rana, O.: Fog computing for the internet of things: a survey. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 19(2), 18:1–18:41 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3301443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Rodriguez, M.A., Buyya, R.: Container-based cluster orchestration systems: a taxonomy and future directions. Softw. Pract. Exp. 49(5), 698–719 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Röger, H., Mayer, R.: A comprehensive survey on parallelization and elasticity in stream processing. ACM Comput. Surv. 52(2), 36:1–36:37 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Rossi, F., Cardellini, V., Lo Presti, F.: Elastic deployment of software containers in geo-distributed computing environments. In: Proceedings of IEEE ISCC 2019 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCC47284.2019.8969607

  64. Rossi, F., Nardelli, M., Cardellini, V.: Horizontal and vertical scaling of container-based applications using reinforcement learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE CLOUD 2019, pp. 329–338 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLOUD.2019.00061

  65. Santos, J., Wauters, T., Volckaert, B., De Turck, F.: Towards network-aware resource provisioning in Kubernetes for fog computing applications. In: Proceedings of IEEE NetSoft 2019, pp. 351–359 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/NETSOFT.2019.8806671

  66. Souza, V., et al.: Towards a proper service placement in combined fog-to-cloud (F2C) architectures. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 87, 1–15 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Subashini, S., Kavitha, V.: A survey on security issues in service delivery models of cloud computing. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 34(1), 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A.G.: Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (2018)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  69. Tan, B., Ma, H., Mei, Y.: A hybrid genetic programming hyper-heuristic approach for online two-level resource allocation in container-based clouds. In: Proceedings of IEEE CEC 2019, pp. 2681–2688 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2019.8790220

  70. Tang, Z., Zhou, X., Zhang, F., Jia, W., Zhao, W.: Migration modeling and learning algorithms for containers in fog computing. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 12(5), 712–725 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2018.2827070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Tesauro, G., Jong, N.K., Das, R., Bennani, M.N.: A hybrid reinforcement learning approach to autonomic resource allocation. In: Proceedings of IEEE ICAC 2006, pp. 65–73 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAC.2006.1662383

  72. Townend, P., et al.: Improving data center efficiency through holistic scheduling in Kubernetes. In: Proceedings of IEEE SOSE 2019, pp. 156–166 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  73. Wen, Z., Yang, R., Garraghan, P., Lin, T., Xu, J., Rovatsos, M.: Fog orchestration for internet of things services. IEEE Internet Comput. 21(2), 16–24 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Weyns, D., et al.: On patterns for decentralized control in self-adaptive systems. In: de Lemos, R., Giese, H., Müller, H.A., Shaw, M. (eds.) Software Engineering for Self-Adaptive Systems II. LNCS, vol. 7475, pp. 76–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35813-5_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  75. Wu, Y., Rao, R., Hong, P., Ma, J.: FAS: a flow aware scaling mechanism for stream processing platform service based on LMS. In: Proceedings of ICMSS 2017, pp. 280–284. ACM (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3034950.3034965

  76. Xu, J., Chen, L., Ren, S.: Online learning for offloading and autoscaling in energy harvesting mobile edge computing. IEEE Trans. Cogn. Commun. Netw. 3(3), 361–373 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TCCN.2017.2725277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Yi, S., Hao, Z., Qin, Z., Li, Q.: Fog computing: platform and applications. In: Proceedings of HotWeb 2015, pp. 73–78. IEEE (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/HotWeb.2015.22

  78. Yigitoglu, E., Mohamed, M., Liu, L., Ludwig, H.: Foggy: a framework for continuous automated IoT application deployment in fog computing. In: Proceedings of IEEE AIMS 2017, pp. 38–45 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/AIMS.2017.14

  79. Zhao, D., Mohamed, M., Ludwig, H.: Locality-aware scheduling for containers in cloud computing. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 8(2), 635–646 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  80. Zhou, Z., Liu, P., Feng, J., Zhang, Y., Mumtaz, S., Rodriguez, J.: Computation resource allocation and task assignment optimization in vehicular fog computing: a contract-matching approach. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol. 68(4), 3113–3125 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Zhu, J., Chan, D.S., Prabhu, M.S., Natarajan, P., Hu, H., Bonomi, F.: Improving web sites performance using edge servers in fog computing architecture. In: Proceedings of IEEE SOSE 2013, pp. 320–323 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  82. Zhu, Q., Agrawal, G.: Resource provisioning with budget constraints for adaptive applications in cloud environments. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 5(4), 497–511 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSC.2011.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Valeria Cardellini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cardellini, V., Lo Presti, F., Nardelli, M., Rossi, F. (2020). Self-adaptive Container Deployment in the Fog: A Survey. In: Brandic, I., Genez, T., Pietri, I., Sakellariou, R. (eds) Algorithmic Aspects of Cloud Computing. ALGOCLOUD 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12041. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58628-7_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58628-7_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58627-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58628-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics