Abstract
This paper investigates the semantics and pragmatics of the Japanese equative marker hodo, which has the interesting property that it patterns as a negative polarity item on some but not all of its uses. We argue that the distributional patterns characterizing hodo derive from its weak existential semantics, which result in a trivial meaning in certain configurations. We further propose a pragmatic account of the presuppositional effects found with hodo, and discuss potential extensions to other data in Japanese and beyond. Overall, our findings add to other recent work demonstrating that the presence or absence of maximality represents an important dimension of cross-linguistic variation in the semantics of equative constructions.
This work has been supported by “On Development of Logical Language and Mathematical Concepts”, Osaka University International Joint Research Program (A), (Principal Investigator: Yoichi Miyamoto). Additional support was provided by the German Science Foundation (DFG) via grant SO1157-1/2 to the third author. We thank Luka Crnič for very helpful discussion.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We thank J.R Hayashishita for pointing this out.
- 2.
We thank a LENLS reviewer for bringing this parallel to our attention.
References
Beck, S.: Comparative constructions. In: Maienborn, C., von Heusinger, C., Portner, P. (eds.) Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning, vol. 2, pp. 1341–1389. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin (2011)
Crnič, L., Fox, D.: Equatives and maximality. In: Altshuler, D., Rett, J. (eds.) The Semantics of Plurals, Focus, Degrees, and Times, pp. 163–184. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04438-1_9
Hayashishita, J.R.: Izyoo(ni)-and gurai-comparatives: comparisons of deviation in Japanese. Gengo Kenkyu 132, 77–109 (2007)
Hayashishita, J.R.: Yori-comparatives: a reply to Beck et al. (2004). J. East Asian Linguist. 18(2), 65–100 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-009-9040-5
Hayashishita, J.-R.: Reconfirming izyoo(ni)- and gurai-comparatives as comparisons of deviation. J. East Asian Linguist. 26(2), 163–187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10831-016-9152-7
Heim, I.: Degree operators and scope. In: Jackson, B., Matthews, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 10th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference (SALT10), pp. 60–84. CLC Publications, Ithaca (2000). https://doi.org/10.3765/salt.v10i0.3102
Katzir, R.: Structurally-defined alternatives. Linguist. Philos. 30(6), 669–690 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-010-9074-1
Kennedy, C.: Vagueness and grammar: the semantics of relative and absolute gradable adjectives. Linguist. Philos. 30(1), 1–45 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10988-006-9008-0
Klein, E.: A semantics for positive and comparative adjectives. Linguist. Philos. 4(1), 1–45 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00351812
Kubota, Y.: The presuppositional nature of izyoo(-ni) and gurai comparatives: a note on Hayashishita (2007). Gengo Kenkyu 141, 33–46 (2012)
Lasersohn, P.: Pragmatic halos. Language 75(3), 522–551 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/417059
Leffel, T., Cremers, A., Gotzner, N., Romoli, J.: Vagueness in implicature: the case of modified adjectives. J. Semant. 36(2), 317–348 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffy020
Meier, C.: The meaning of too, enough and so... that. Nat. Lang. Semant. 11(1), 69–107 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023002608785
Penka, D.: Degree equatives - the same as comparatives? In: Workshop on Equative Constructions. University of Cologne (2016)
Rett, J.: Separate but equal: a typology of equative constructions. In: Hallman, P. (ed.) Degree and Quantification. Brill, Leiden (in press)
Sawada, O.: Pragmatic aspects of implicit comparison: an economy-based approach. J. Pragmat. 41(6), 1079–1103 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.004
Simons, M.: On the conversational basis of some presuppositions. In: Capone, A., Lo Piparo, F., Carapezza, M. (eds.) Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. PPPP, vol. 2, pp. 329–348. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_13
Umbach, C., Özge, U.: Scalar and non-scalar comparison across categories: the case of Turkish equatives. In: TbiLLC 2019 (2019)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tanaka, E., Mizutani, K., Solt, S. (2020). Equative hodo and the Polarity Effects of Existential Semantics. In: Sakamoto, M., Okazaki, N., Mineshima, K., Satoh, K. (eds) New Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence. JSAI-isAI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12331. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58790-1_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58790-1_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58789-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58790-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)