Abstract
The field of e-government has been an attractive area of ontology development in the past years, resulting in an increase in the number of e-government ontologies on the web. The availability of these ontologies gives the opportunity to reuse them in future e-government projects rather than trying to develop similar ontologies de novo. This study aims to promote the selection and reuse of e-government ontologies on the web, through the provision of a ranked list of existing e-government ontologies on the basis of their quality metrics. A number of 23 e-government ontologies are downloaded on the web and their quality metrics are computed with the OntoMetrics online ontology evaluation environment. Thereafter, a decision making algorithm is applied to rank the e-government ontologies based on the aggregation of their quality metrics. The decision scheme is constituted of the 23 e-government ontologies or alternatives and their 11 quality metrics or attributes. The experimental results yielded an ordered list of the 23 inputs e-government ontologies ranked according to their quality metrics. This may provide some insights on the selection and reuse of these ontologies in future e-government projects.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alazemi, N., Al-Shehab, A.J., Alhakem, H.A.: Semantic-based e-government framework based on domain ontologies: a case of Kuwait region. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 96, 2557–2566 (2018)
Distinto, I., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: LOTED2: an ontology of European public procurement notices. Semant. Web J. 7, 1–15 (2016)
Ferneda, E., et al.: Potential of ontology for interoperability in e-government: discussing international initiatives and the Brazilliang case. Braz. J. Inf. Stud. Res. Trends 10, 47–57 (2016)
Fonou-Dombeu, J.V., Huisman, M.: Engineering semantic web services for government business processes automation. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E. (eds.) EGOVIS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9265, pp. 40–54. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22389-6_4
Ouchetto, H., Ouchetto, O., Roudies, O.: Ontology-oriented e-gov services retrieval. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Issues 2, 99–107 (2012)
Petrusic, D., Segedinac, M., Konjovic, Z.: Semantic modelling and ontology integration of the open government systems. Tehnicki Vjesnik 23, 1631–1641 (2016)
Lonsdale, D., Embley, D.W., Ding, Y., Xu, L., Hepp, M.: Reusing ontologies and language components for ontology generation. Data Knowl. Eng. 69, 318–330 (2010)
Groza, A., Dragoste, I., Sincai, I., Jimborean, I., Moraru, V.: An ontology selection and ranking system based on the analytical hierarchy process. In: The 16th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numerical Algorithms for Scientific Computing, Timisoara, Romania (2014)
Esposito, A., Zappatore, M., Tarricone, L.: Applying multi-criteria approaches to ontology ranking: a comparison with AKtiveRank. Int. J. Metadata Semant. Ontol. 7, 197–208 (2012)
Subhashini, R., Akilandeswari, J., Haris, S.: An integrated ontology ranking method for enhancing knowledge reuse. Int. J. Eng. Technol. (IJET) 6, 1424–1431 (2014)
Butt, A.S., Haller, A., Xie, L.: DWRank: learning concept ranking for ontology search. Semant. Web 7, 447–461 (2016)
Lee, H.C., Chang, C.: Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for ranking renewable energy sources in Taiwan. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 92, 883–896 (2018)
Alani, H., Brewster, C., Shadbolt, N.: Ranking ontologies with AKTiveRank. In: 5th International Conference on the Semantic Web, Athens, Greece, pp. 1–15 (2006)
Park, J., Ohb, S., Ahn, J.: Ontology selection ranking model for knowledge reuse. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 5133–5144 (2011)
Yu, W., Cao, J., Chen, J.: A Novel Approach for Ranking Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: 1st International Symposium on Pervasive Computing and Applications, Urumchi, Xinjiang, China, pp. 608–612 (2006)
Yu, W., Chen, J.: Ontology ranking for the semantic web. In: 3rd International Symposium on Intelligent Information Technology Application, NanChang, China, pp. 573–574 (2009)
Jones, M., Alani, H.: Content-based ontology ranking. In: 9th International Protégé Conference, Stanford, CA, USA, pp. 1–4 (2006)
Lantow, B.: OntoMetrics: putting metrics into use for ontology evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management (IC3K 2016), Joaquim Filipe, Portugal, pp. 186–191 (2016)
Fonou-Dombeu, J.V., Viriri, S.: CRank: a novel framework for ranking semantic web ontologies. In: Abdelwahed, E.H., Bellatreche, L., Golfarelli, M., Méry, D., Ordonez, C. (eds.) MEDI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11163, pp. 107–121. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00856-7_7
Fonou-Dombeu, J.V.: A comparative application of multi-criteria decision making in ontology ranking. In: Abramowicz, W., Corchuelo, R. (eds.) BIS 2019. LNBIP, vol. 353, pp. 55–69. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-20485-3_5
Fonou-Dombeu, J.V., Viriri, S.: OntoMetrics evaluation of quality of e-government ontologies. In: Kő, A., Francesconi, E., Anderst-Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds.) EGOVIS 2019. LNCS, vol. 11709, pp. 189–203. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27523-5_14
Roszkowska, E.: Rank ordering criteria weighting methods - a comparative review. Optimum Studia Ekonomicze NR 5, 14–33 (2013)
Pang, J., Zhang, G., Chen, G.: ELECTRE I decision model of reliability design scheme for computer numerical control. J. Softw. 6, 894–900 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fonou-Dombeu, J.V. (2020). Ranking E-government Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: KÅ‘, A., Francesconi, E., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A., Khalil, I. (eds) Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective. EGOVIS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12394. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58957-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-58957-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-58956-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-58957-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)