Skip to main content

Game Theory Based Patent Infringement Detection Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12392))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

With fiercely increasing competition of intellectual property, the protection of intellectual property (IP) is paid increasing attention from worldwide. Effective patent infringement detection is the foundation of patent protection. Given the big patent data, manual patent infringement detection is inefficient and error prone. The design of automatic infringement detection method faces some challenges including: (1) how to detect patent infringement by novelty and non-obviousness; (2) which parts of a patent are selected against those of its counterpart patents in infringement detection. To solve the above issues, a game theory based patent infringement detection method is proposed. In the method, both the novelty and the non-obviousness are considered when the patentees take actions. The infringement detection is a game process to find the best action. Our method is compared with the state-of-the-art method on some patent data sets. The results show that the dynamic game method outperforms the baseline method in the evaluation measurement. Such method can be applied to patent examination and patent infringement litigation.

Supported by the National Science Foundation of China (grant no. 61801251) and Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2018BS06002).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://developer.uspto.gov/ptab-web/#/ search/decisions.

References

  1. Abbas, A., Zhang, L., Khan, S.U.: A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Pat. Inf. 37, 3–13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cascini, G., Zini, M.: Measuring patent similarity by comparing inventions functional trees. In: Cascini, G. (ed.) CAI 2008. TIFIP, vol. 277, pp. 31–42. Springer, Boston, MA (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09697-1_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Deng, N., Chen, X., Xiong, C.: Semantic similarity calculation of TCM patents in intelligent retrieval based on deep learning. In: Barolli, L., Hellinckx, P., Natwichai, J. (eds.) 3PGCIC 2019. LNNS, vol. 96, pp. 472–481. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33509-0_44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Gerken, J.M., Moehrle, M.G.: A new instrument for technology monitoring: novelty in patents measured by semantic patent analysis. Scientometrics, 91(3), 645–670 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Helmers, L., Horn, F., Biegler, F., Oppermann, T., Müller, K.-R.: Automating the search for a patents prior art with a full text similarity search. PLoS ONE 14(3), e0212103 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hido, S., et al.: Modeling patent quality: a system for large-scale patentability analysis using text mining. Inf. Media Technol. 7(3), 1180–1191 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ji, X., Gu, X., Dai, F., Chen, J., Le, C.: Patent collaborative filtering recommendation approach based on patent similarity. In 2011 Eighth International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), vol. 3, pp. 1699–1703. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kasravi, K., Risov, M.: Multivariate patent similarity detection. In: 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lee, C., Song, B., Park, Y.: How to assess patent infringement risks: a semantic patent claim analysis using dependency relationships. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 25(1), 23–38 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma, C., Zhao, T., Li, H.: A method for calculating patent similarity using patent model tree based on neural network. In: Ren, J., et al. (eds.) International Conference on Brain Inspired Cognitive Systems, vol. 10989, pp. 633–643. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00563-4_62

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Moehrle, M.G., Gerken, J.M.: Measuring textual patent similarity on the basis of combined concepts: design decisions and their consequences. Scientometrics 91(3), 805–826 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Myerson, R.B.: Game Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Park, H., Yoon, J., Kim, K.: Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities. Scientometrics 90(2), 515–529 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriguez, A., Kim, B., Turkoz, M., Lee, J.-M., Coh, B.-Y., Jeong, M.K.: New multi-stage similarity measure for calculation of pairwise patent similarity in a patent citation network. Scientometrics 103(2), 565–581 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1531-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Taduri, S., Lau, G.T., Law, K.H., Kesan, J.P.: Retrieval of patent documents from heterogeneous sources using ontologies and similarity analysis. In: 2011 IEEE Fifth International Conference on Semantic Computing, pp. 538–545. IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Wang, X., Ren, H., Chen, Y., Liu, Y., Qiao, Y., Huang, Y.: Measuring patent similarity with SAO semantic analysis. Scientometrics 121(1), 1–23 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Xu, H., Zeng, W., Gui, J., Qu, P., Zhu, X., Wang, L.: Exploring similarity between academic paper and patent based on latent semantic analysis and vector space model. In: 2015 12th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD), pp. 801–805. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yanagihori, K., Tsuda, K.: Verification of patent document similarity of using dictionary data extracted from notification of reasons for refusal. In: 2015 IEEE 39th Annual Computer Software and Applications Conference, vol. 3, pp. 349–354. IEEE (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Weidong Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, W., Liu, X., Kong, Y., Yang, Z., Qiao, W. (2020). Game Theory Based Patent Infringement Detection Method. In: Hartmann, S., Küng, J., Kotsis, G., Tjoa, A.M., Khalil, I. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12392. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59051-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59051-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59050-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59051-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics