Skip to main content

Multi-view Clustering with mvReliefF for Parkinson’s Disease Patients Subgroup Detection

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (AIME 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12299))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Parkinson’s disease is a chronic neurodegenerative disease affecting people worldwide. Parkinson’s disease patients experience motor symptoms and many other symptoms that affect the quality of their lives. Discovering groups of patients with similar symptoms from different symptom groups can improve the understanding of this incurable disease and advance the development of personalized treatment of Parkinson’s disease patients. This paper proposes a multi-view clustering approach to discover groups of patients experiencing similar symptoms from different symptom groups (views). For that we modified ReliefF feature ranking algorithm to characterize subsets of most informative symptoms that maximize the similarity between the detected patient groups, described by symptoms from different views (i.e. different symptom groups). The adapted mvReliefF algorithm calculates the weight of features based on the values of their neighbors over multiple views. The current approach works for two views simultaneously, but can be extended to multiple views. The results of the experiments show that the proposed methodology, applied on a pair of data sets from the PPMI data collection, successfully identified lists of most important symptoms that divide patients into groups, ordered by the severity of patients’ symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    MDS-UPDRS denotes Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.

  2. 2.

    Alternatively, the clustering algorithm and the number of clusters could be determined based on the value of the silhouette score [11]—a normalized measure for cluster quality; these experiments are left for further work.

  3. 3.

    We chose the pair (MDS-UPDRS Part II, MDS-UPDRS Part III) for this analysis as it has the highest similarity with the cluster labels of groups of patients with similar overall status presented in [14].

  4. 4.

    For reference, prior to normalization, feature NP2FREZ from MDS-UPDRS Part II has weight 42485.06, while feature NP3HMOVR from MDS-UPDRS Part III has weight of 32853.21.

  5. 5.

    https://www.michaeljfox.org/grant/defining-pd-subtypes-based-patterns-long-term-outcome.

  6. 6.

    NP3BRADY, NP3TTAPL, NP3RTCON, NP3FACXP, NP3FTAPL, NP3PRSPL, NP3TTAPR, NP3PRSPR, and NP2HWRT.

References

  1. Cohen, W.W.: Fast effective rule induction. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 115–123 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Goetz, C., et al.: Movement disorder society-sponsored revision of the unified Parkinson’s disease rating scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov. Disord. Soc. 23(15), 2129–2170 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hubert, L., Arabie, P.: Comparing partitions. J. Classif. 2(1), 193–218 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jankovic, J., et al.: Variable expression of Parkinson’s disease - a base-line analysis of the DATATOP cohort. Neurology 40(10), 1529 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kira, K., Rendell, L.A.: The feature selection problem: traditional methods and a new algorithm. In: Proceedings of AAAI 1992, vol. 2, pp. 129–134 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kononenko, I.: Estimating attributes: analysis and extensions of RELIEF. In: Bergadano, F., De Raedt, L. (eds.) ECML 1994. LNCS, vol. 784, pp. 171–182. Springer, Heidelberg (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-57868-4_57

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Marek, K., et al.: The Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI). Prog. Neurobiol. 95(4), 629–635 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rand, W.M.: Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 66(336), 846–850 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Robnik-Šikonja, M., Kononenko, I.: An adaptation of Relief for attribute estimation in regression. In: Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference (ICML 1997), pp. 296–304 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Robnik-Šikonja, M., Kononenko, I.: Theoretical and empirical analysis of ReliefF and RReliefF. Mach. Learn. 53(1–2), 23–69 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thenganatt, M.A., Jankovic, J.: Parkinson disease subtypes. JAMA Neurol. 71(4), 499–504 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Valmarska, A., Miljkovic, D., Konitsiotis, S., Gatsios, D., Lavrač, N., Robnik-Šikonja, M.: Symptoms and medications change patterns for Parkinson’s disease patients stratification. Artif. Intell. Med. 91, 82–95 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Valmarska, A., Miljkovic, D., Lavrač, N., Robnik-Šikonja, M.: Analysis of medications change in Parkinson’s disease progression data. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 51(2), 301–337 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., Livny, M.: Birch: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases. ACM Sigmod Record 25(2), 103–114 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Tadej Magajna who implemented the mvReliefF algorithm as part of his M.Sc thesis under supervision of Marko Robnik-Šikonja. The research was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (research core funding programs P2-0209, P6-0411 and P2-0103, and project N2-0078) and the Slovenian Ministry of Education, Science and Sport (project R 2.1 - Public call for the promotion of researchers at the beginning of a career 2.1). Data used in the preparation of this article were obtained from the Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) (www.ppmi-info.org/data).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anita Valmarska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Rules Describing Clusters of Patients on the Concatenated Data Set

A Rules Describing Clusters of Patients on the Concatenated Data Set

Classification rules describing clusters obtained on the data set concatenated from the MDS-UPDRS Part II and MDS-UPDRS Part III are presented in Table 4. The rules are constructed using the Weka implementation of the Ripper [1] algorithm, with its default parameters.

Table 4. Rules describing clusters obtained by Birch clustering on the concatenated data set of most important attributes from MDS-UPDRS Part II and MDS-UPDRS Part II. Variables p and n denote the number of covered true positive and false positive examples respectively.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Valmarska, A., Miljkovic, D., Lavrač, N., Robnik–Šikonja, M. (2020). Multi-view Clustering with mvReliefF for Parkinson’s Disease Patients Subgroup Detection. In: Michalowski, M., Moskovitch, R. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12299. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59137-3_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59137-3_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59136-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59137-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics