Skip to main content

DLchain: Blockchain with Deep Learning as Proof-of-Useful-Work

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Services – SERVICES 2020 (SERVICES 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 12411))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Blockchains based on Proof-of-Work can maintain a distributed ledger with a high security guarantee but also lead to severe energy waste due to the useless hash calculation. Proof-of-Useful-Work (PoUW) mechanisms are alternatives, but finding hard puzzles with easy verification and useful results is challenging. Recent popular deep learning algorithms require large amount of computation resources due to the large-scale training datasets and the complexity of the models. The work of deep learning training is useful, and the model verification process is much shorter than its training process. Therefore, in this paper, we propose DLchain, a PoUW-based blockchain using deep learning training as the hard puzzle. Theoretical analysis shows that DLchain can achieve a security level comparable to existing PoW-based cryptocurrency when the miners’ best interest is to maximize their revenue. Notably, this is achieved without relying on common assumptions made in existing PoUW-based blockchain such as globally synchronized timestamps. Simulated experiments also show that the extra network delay caused by data transfer and the full nodes’ validation is acceptable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ball, M., Rosen, A., Sabin, M., Vasudevan, P.N.: Proofs of useful work. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2017:203 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bardenet, R., Brendel, M., Kégl, B., Sebag, M.: Collaborative hyperparameter tuning. In: ICML 2013, pp. 199–207 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barinov, I.: Proof of Stake Decentralized Autonomous Organization

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bentov, I., Lee, C., Mizrahi, A., Rosenfeld, M.: Proof of activity: extending bitcoin’s proof of work via proof of stake. IACR Cryptology ePrint Archive 2014:452 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergstra, J., Bengio, Y.: Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 13(Feb), 281–305 (2012)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chatterjee, K., Goharshady, A.K., Pourdamghani, A.: Hybrid mining: exploiting blockchain’s computational power for distributed problem solving. In: SAC 2019, pp. 374–381. ACM (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chenli, C., Li, B., Shi, Y., Jung, T.: Energy-recycling blockchain with proof-of-deep-learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.03912 (2019)

  8. “Fake Stake” Kernel Description, February 2019. https://bit.ly/2Txk146

  9. Duchi, J., Hazan, E., Singer, Y.: Adaptive subgradient methods for online learning and stochastic optimization. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12(Jul), 2121–2159 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Dziembowski, S., Eckey, L., Faust, S.: Fairswap: how to fairly exchange digital goods. In: ACM SIGSAC, pp. 967–984 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. King, S.: Primecoin: Cryptocurrency with Prime Number Proof-of-work, vol. 1, p. 6, 7 July 2013

    Google Scholar 

  12. King, S., Nadal, S.: PPCoin: Peer-to-Peer Crypto-currency With Proof-of-Stake. Self-published paper, 19 August 2012

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, B., Chenli, C., Xu, X., Jung, T., Shi, Y.: Exploiting computation power of blockchain for biomedical image segmentation. In: CVPR 2019 Workshops (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lopp, J.: Bitcoin timestamp security, July 2019. https://bit.ly/332n877

  15. Loshchilov, I., Hutter, F.: SGDR: Stochastic gradient descent with warm restarts. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.03983 (2016)

  16. Nakamoto, S., et al.: Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nxt whitepaper. https://nxtwiki.org/wiki/Whitepaper:Nxt, journal=Nxt

  18. Ongaro, D., Ousterhout, J.: In search of an understandable consensus algorithm. In:U SENIX ATC, vol. 14, pp. 305–319 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’donoghue, B., Candes, E.: Adaptive restart for accelerated gradient schemes. Found. Comput. Math. 15(3), 715–732 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Paritytech. paritytech/parity-ethereum, July 2019. https://github.com/paritytech/parity/wiki/Proof-of-Authority-Chains

  21. Perkins, T.J.: Reinforcement learning for pomdps based on action values and stochastic optimization. In: AAAI/IAAI, pp. 199–204 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Polyak, B.T., Juditsky, A.B.: Acceleration of stochastic approximation by averaging. SIAM J. Control Optim. 30(4), 838–855 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Ramachandran, G.S., et al.: Trinity: a byzantine fault-tolerant distributed publish-subscribe system with immutable blockchain-based persistence. In: ICBC, pp. 227–235. IEEE (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Robbins, H., Monro, S.: A stochastic approximation method. Ann. Math. Stat. 22, 400–407 (1951)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruder, S.: An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.04747 (2016)

  26. Rumelhart, D.E., Hinton, G.E., Williams, R.J., et al.: Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Cogn. Model. 5(3), 1 (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Saleh, F.: Blockchain Without Waste: Proof-of-Stake. Available at SSRN 3183935 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Shoker, A.: Sustainable blockchain through proof of exercise. In: NCA, pp. 1–9. IEEE (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Snoek, J., Larochelle, H., Adams, R.P.: Practical Bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms. In: NIPS, pp. 2951–2959 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tencent. Tencent/neuralnlp-neuralclassifier, April 2020

    Google Scholar 

  31. Nvidia gtx 970 vs titan v. https://bit.ly/3aFwVCQ

  32. Wang, W., et al.: A survey on consensus mechanisms and mining strategy management in blockchain networks. IEEE Access 7, 22328–22370 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Williams, R.J.: Simple statistical gradient-following algorithms for connectionist reinforcement learning. Mach. Learn. 8(3–4), 229–256 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Young, S.R., Rose, D.C., Karnowski, T.P. Lim, S.-H., Patton, R.M.: Optimizing deep learning hyper-parameters through an evolutionary algorithm. In: MLHPC 2015, p. 4. ACM (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Taeho Jung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chenli, C., Li, B., Jung, T. (2020). DLchain: Blockchain with Deep Learning as Proof-of-Useful-Work. In: Ferreira, J.E., Palanisamy, B., Ye, K., Kantamneni, S., Zhang, LJ. (eds) Services – SERVICES 2020. SERVICES 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12411. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59595-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59595-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59594-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59595-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics