Abstract
Dynamic pricing can be used for better fleet distribution in free-floating vehicle sharing (FFVS), and thus increase utilization and revenue for the provider by reducing supply-demand asymmetry. Supply-demand asymmetry refers to the existence of an undersupply of vehicles at some locations at the same time as underutilization of vehicles at other locations. We propose to use dynamic pricing as an instrument to incentivize users to rebalance these vehicles from low demand locations to high demand locations. Despite significant research in rebalancing vehicle sharing, the literature so far lacks experimental results on dynamic pricing in free-floating vehicle sharing. We propose to use an algorithm that minimizes the differences in the idle time of vehicles. The algorithm is tested in a real-life experiment that was conducted in cooperation with an FFVS provider. The results of the experiment are not statistically significant, but they clearly indicate that even slight differences in pricing and a simple algorithm can already influence user-behavior to counter supply-demand asymmetry. Improving the existing algorithm with more experimental research is advised to further uncover the potential of this strategy.
This research is supported by Felyx E-Scooter Sharing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bundesverband carsharing e.v. (bcs) entwicklung der carsharing-varianten (2019). https://carsharing.de/presse/fotos/zahlen-daten/entwicklung-carsharing-varianten. Accessed 11 Nov 2019
Beirigo, B., Schulte, F., Negenborn, R.R.: A business class for autonomous mobility-on-demand: modeling service quality constraints in ridesharing systems (2019)
Beirigo, B.A., Schulte, F., Negenborn, R.R.: Integrating people and freight transportation using shared autonomous vehicles with compartments. IFAC-PapersOnLine 51(9), 392–397 (2018)
Bergvall-Kareborn, B., Hoist, M., Stahlbrost, A.: Concept design with a living lab approach. In: 2009 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 1–10. IEEE (2009)
Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Ståhlbröst, A.: Living lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. Int. J. Innov. Reg. Dev. 1(4), 356–370 (2009)
Castillo, J.C., Knoepfle, D., Weyl, G.: Surge pricing solves the wild goose chase. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Economics and Computation, pp. 241–242. ACM (2017)
Chemla, D., Meunier, F., Calvo, R.W.: Bike sharing systems: solving the static rebalancing problem. Discret. Optim. 10(2), 120–146 (2013)
Chen, M.K., Sheldon, M.: Dynamic pricing in a labor market: surge pricing and flexible work on the Uber platform. In: Ec, p. 455 (2016)
Dediu, H.: The micromobility definition (2019). Innovativemobility.org. Accessed 11 Nov 2019
Hall, J., Kendrick, C., Nosko, C.: The effects of Uber’s surge pricing: a case study. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business (2015)
Heineke, K., Kloss, B., Scurtu, D., Weig, F.: Micromobility’s 15,000-mile checkup (2019). https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/automotive-and-assembly/our-insights/micromobilitys-15000-mile-checkup. Accessed 11 Nov 2019
Henao, A., Marshall, W.E.: The impact of ride-hailing on vehicle miles traveled. Transportation 46(6), 2173–2194 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9923-2
Herrmann, S., Schulte, F., Voß, S.: Increasing acceptance of free-floating car sharing systems using smart relocation strategies: a survey based study of car2go Hamburg. In: González-Ramírez, R.G., Schulte, F., Voß, S., Ceroni Díaz, J.A. (eds.) ICCL 2014. LNCS, vol. 8760, pp. 151–162. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11421-7_10
Korolko, N., Woodard, D., Yan, C., Zhu, H.: Dynamic pricing and matching in ride-hailing platforms. SSRN (2018)
Kroll, J.: Dynamic pricing in shared mobility on demand service and its social impacts (2015)
Pal, A., Zhang, Y.: Free-floating bike sharing: solving real-life large-scale static rebalancing problems. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 80, 92–116 (2017)
Pfrommer, J., Warrington, J., Schildbach, G., Morari, M.: Dynamic vehicle redistribution and online price incentives in shared mobility systems. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15(4), 1567–1578 (2014)
Qiu, H., Li, R., Zhao, J.: Dynamic pricing in shared mobility on demand service, pp. 1–9 (2018)
Singla, A., Santoni, M., Meenen, M., Krause, A.: Incentivizing users for balancing bike sharing systems, pp. 723–729 (2015)
Spieser, K., Samaranayake, S., Gruel, W., Frazzoli, E.: Shared-vehicle mobility-on-demand systems: a fleet operator’s guide to rebalancing empty vehicles. In: Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, No. 16-5987. Transportation Research Board (2016)
Ståhlbröst, A.: Forming future IT: the living lab way of user involvement. Ph.D. thesis, Luleå tekniska universitet (2008)
Wen, J., Zhao, J., Jaillet, P.: Rebalancing shared mobility-on-demand systems: a reinforcement learning approach. In: 2017 IEEE 20th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), pp. 220–225. IEEE (2017)
Zhou, S.: Dynamic incentive scheme for rental vehicle fleet management (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Neijmeijer, N., Schulte, F., Tierney, K., Polinder, H., Negenborn, R.R. (2020). Dynamic Pricing for User-Based Rebalancing in Free-Floating Vehicle Sharing: A Real-World Case. In: Lalla-Ruiz, E., Mes, M., Voß, S. (eds) Computational Logistics. ICCL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59747-4_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59747-4_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-59746-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-59747-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)