Skip to main content

How to Think About Third Wave HCI that Questions the Normative Culture in Computer Science?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1293))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1175 Accesses

Abstract

Think about normative culture in computer science and question it based on third wave Human-Computer Interaction also involves problematizing our culture, our society and us as part of livelihood. The Science, Technology and Society studies that are basing our work by feminists’ optics reveal that there is no way to think about technoscience without thinking about people who are the reason for its existence. Our objective is highlight plural approaches in the computer science graduate courses documents in Brazilian Computer Science and in Bachelor in Information Systems and Computer Engineering from a public institution in Brazil based on feminist theories of Science, Technology and Society. The work results are: a) structural barriers in low women participation; b) gender disparities are not even mentioned in Computer Engineering documents; c) intersection of race, class and gender are present only in Bachelor in Information Systems documents; d) power relations in macro axes reveal intentions of those who create computer science documents in Brazil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Available in: http://portal.utfpr.edu.br/cursos/coordenacoes/graduacao/curitiba/ct-sistemas-de-informacao Accessed in 13 dec 2019.

  2. 2.

    Available in: http://engcomp.dainf.ct.utfpr.edu.br/estrutura.php Acessed in 13 dec 2019.

  3. 3.

    Available in: https://www.sbc.org.br/ Accessed in 10 dec 2019.

References

  1. Winner, L.: Artefatos têm política? Trad. Debora Pazetto Ferreira; Luiz Henrique de Lacerda Abrahão. Analytica, Rio de Janeiro, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 195–218 (2017). https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/analytica/article/viewFile/22470/12527. Accessed 30 Sept 2019

  2. Bødker, S.: Third-wave HCI, 10 years later—participation and sharing. Mag. Interact. 22(5), 24–31 (2015). https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2804405. Accessed 01 Oct 2019

  3. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S.: Humanistic HCI, 163 p. Morgan and Claypool Publisher (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Breslin, S., Wadhwa, B.: Engendering interaction design. In: 3rd International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr) (2014). https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7002719. Accessed 01 Oct 2019

  5. Schlesinger, A., Edwards, K., Grinter, R.E.: Intersectional HCI: engaging identity through gender, race and class. CHI (2017). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Intersectional-HCI%3A-Engaging-Identity-through-Race%2C-Schlesinger-Edwards/27b49a706d907c5d6858068ba97bbe873fcf687f. Accessed 01 Oct 2019

  6. Yuval-davis, N.: Intersectionality and feminist politics. Eur. J. Women’s Stud. 13(3), 193–209 (2006). https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00571274. Accessed 14 Oct 2019

  7. Dahmoon, R.K.: Considerations on mainstreaming intersectionality. SAGE (2011). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1065912910379227. Accessed 18 Oct 2019

  8. Wajcman, J.: TechnoFeminism. Polity Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Haraway, D.J.: Saberes localizados: a questão da ciência para o feminismo e o privilégio da perspectiva parcial. Cadernos Pagu (5), 7–41 (1995). https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/cadpagu/article/view/1773. Accessed 01 Oct 2019

  10. Lauretis, T.: A tecnologia do gênero, pp. 1–30. Indiana University Press (1987). http://marcoaureliosc.com.br/cineantropo/lauretis.pdf. Accessed 30 Sept 2019

  11. Castelini, P.: Mulheres na computação: percepções, memórias e participação de estudantes e egressas. Dissertação de Mestrado em Tecnologia e Sociedade, Curitiba, Paraná, 125 p. (2018). http://repositorio.utfpr.edu.br:8080/jspui/handle/1/2944. Accessed 8 Aug 2019

  12. Wajcman, J.: Feminism Confronts Technology. The Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park (1991)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) - Finance Code 001.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pricila Castelini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Castelini, P., Abrahão Amaral, M. (2020). How to Think About Third Wave HCI that Questions the Normative Culture in Computer Science?. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1293. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60699-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60700-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics