Skip to main content

Discontinued Public Spheres? Reproducibility of User Structure in Twitter Discussions on Inter-ethnic Conflicts

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2020)

Abstract

Recently, communication scholars have paid attention to the growing dissonant and dissipative character of the public spheres, especially in their connection to networked discursive spaces. While substantial dissonance of the discussions is well addressed, structural discontinuity of public discussion remains under-explored. Reproducibility of the discussions on similar issues or events in time, we argue, needs to be seen as a marker of stability of public spheres. In this paper, we compare the user and influencer structure of two similar discussions on German Twitter of 2016 (the Cologne mass harassment) and 2019 (the Chemnitz killing). We show that the overall reproducibility of the discussions is extremely low, and the only structural element that reproduces are influential media, mostly of national reach. But even the stability of media presence must be questioned, as both intensity of their presence within the discussion and user engagement with their tweets varies much from one discussion to the other. Thus, one may conclude that the structural stability of public discussion of similar events on Twitter is not reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Habermas, J.: Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Commun. Theory 16(4), 411–426 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pfetsch, B.: Dissonant and disconnected public spheres as challenge for political communication research. Javnost – Public 25(1-2), 59–65 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bruns, A., Burgess, J.E.: The use of Twitter hashtags in the formation of ad hoc publics. In: Proceedings of the 6th European Consortium for Political Research (ECPR) General Conference 2011, pp. 1–9, August 2011

    Google Scholar 

  4. Calhoun, C.J. (ed.): Habermas and the Public Sphere. MIT Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Garimella, V.R.K., Weber, I.: A long-term analysis of polarization on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 11th International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, pp. 528–531, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu, J.S.: Unpacking the influence of informational, organizational, and structural factors on the longitudinal change of the NPO follower-followee network on Twitter. Int. J. Commun. 13, 3802–3825 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brooker, P., Vines, J., Barnett, J., Feltwell, T., Lawson, S.: Everyday socio-political talk in twitter timelines: a longitudinal approach to social media analytics. In: Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bodrunova, S.S., Blekanov, I., Smoliarova, A., Litvinenko, A.: Beyond left and right: real-world political polarization in Twitter discussions on inter-ethnic conflicts. Media Commun. 7, 119–132 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonilla, Y., Rosa, J.: #Ferguson: digital protest, hashtag ethnography, and the racial politics of social media in the United States. Am. Ethnol. 42(1), 4–17 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bimber, B., de Zúñiga, H.G.: The unedited public sphere. New Media Soc. 22(4), 700–715 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Groshek, J., Tandoc, E.: The affordance effect: gatekeeping and (non) reciprocal journalism on Twitter. In: Proceedings of the 7th 2016 International Conference on Social Media & Society, pp. 1–10, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  12. Blekanov, I.S., Sergeev, S.L., Martynenko, I.A.: Constructing topic-oriented web crawlers with generalized core. Sci. Res. Bull. St. Petersburg State Polytech. Univ. 5(157), 9–15 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smoliarova, A.S., Bodrunova, S.S., Blekanov, I.S.: Politicians driving online discussions: are institutionalized influencers top twitter users? In: Kompatsiaris, I., Cave, J., Satsiou, A., Carle, G., Passani, A., Kontopoulos, E., Diplaris, S., McMillan, D. (eds.) INSCI 2017. LNCS, vol. 10673, pp. 132–147. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70284-1_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research has been supported in full by the Russian Science Foundation, grant 16-18-10125-P.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetlana S. Bodrunova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Smoliarova, A.S., Bodrunova, S.S., Blekanov, I.S., Maksimov, A. (2020). Discontinued Public Spheres? Reproducibility of User Structure in Twitter Discussions on Inter-ethnic Conflicts. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1293. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60700-5_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60699-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60700-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics