Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of shifting among and updating of mental models in multi remote tower operations.
Background. Within the development of the future workplace for air traffic controllers (ATCO), innovation shifts to multi remote tower operations. Multi remote tower means, that an ATCO serves air traffic control services for more than one airport at a time from one physically remote located workplace. This change requires adjustments in the way how the ATCO works, as multiple mental models need to be updated constantly. Frequent shifting between airports and mental models respectively is necessary. Updating and shifting are cognitive cost sensitive, as they affect workload and situational awareness negatively. In contrast, higher workload could be beneficial for alertness which could act as a countermeasure in turn.
Method. Four 90-min lasting remote tower Human-In-The-Loop simulation runs with traffic and weather were performed by eight conventional tower experienced ATCOs. Each ATCO completed two runs in multi- and two runs in single-mode. Situational awareness, workload and alertness was measured via self-reports before, during and after each run.
Results. No differences between both modes with respect to situational awareness and alertness could be found. However, significant workload differences could be found during the simulation runs at two times, due to a simulated snowstorm.
Conclusion. The findings indicate no negative effect of shifting among and updating of mental models in multi remote tower. A possible explanation could be, that a common hybrid mental model for in multi-mode is internally developed so that shifting among mental models is perhaps not necessary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fürstenau, N., et al.: Steps towards the virtual tower: remote airport traffic control center (RAiCe). In: Proceedings EnRI International Workshop on ATM/CNS (2009)
Meyer, L., Peukert, M., Josefsson, B., Lundberg, J.: Validation of an empiric method for safety assessment of multi remote tower. In: Proceedings ATM2019 (2019)
Meyer, L., Fricke, H.: Validation of an empiric method for safety assessment of multi remote tower investigating the safety-relevance of limited distinctive features on a multi remote tower-working position. In: Proceedings ATM2016 (2016)
Moehlenbrink, C., Papenfuss, A., Jakobi, J.: The role of workload for work organization in a remote tower control center. Air Traffic Control Q. 20(1), 5–26 (2012)
Mogford, R.H.: Mental models and situation awareness in air traffic control. Int. J. Aviat. Psychol. 7(4), 331–341 (1997)
Kaber, D., Zhang, Y., Jin, S., Mosaly, P., Garner, M.: Effects of hazard exposure and roadway complexity on young and older driver situation awareness and performance. Transp. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 15(5), 600–611 (2012)
Morris, N., Jones, D.M.: Memory updating in working memory: the role of the central executive. Br. J. Psychol. 81(2), 111–121 (1990)
Oehme, A., Leitner, R., Wittbrodt, N.: Challenges of multiple airport control. Aviat. Psychol. Appl. Hum. Factors 3, 1–8 (2013)
Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., Howerter, A., Wager, T.D.: The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: a latent variable analysis. Cogn. Psychol. 41(1), 49–100 (2000)
Thackray, R.I., Bailey, J.P., Touchstone, R.M.: Physiological, subjective, and performance correlates of reported boredom and monotony while performing a simulated radar control task. In: Mackie, R.R. (ed.) Vigilance, pp. 203–215. Springer, Boston (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2529-1_12
Straussberger, S., Schaefer, D.: Monotony in air traffic control. Air Traffic Control Q. 15(3), 183–207 (2007)
Thackray, R.I.: The stress of boredom and monotony: a consideration of the evidence. Psychosom. Med. 43(2), 165–176 (1981)
Taylor, R.M.: Situational awareness rating technique (SART): the development of a tool for aircrew systems design. In: Situational Awareness, pp. 111–128. Routledge (2017)
Jordan, C.S., Brennen, S.D.: Instantaneous Self-Assessment of Workload Technique (ISA). Defence Research Agency, Portsmouth (1992)
Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52, 139–183 (1988)
Åkerstedt, T., Gillberg, M.: Subjective and objective sleepiness in the active individual. Int. J. Neurosci. 52, 29–37 (1990)
Endsley, M.R.: Situation awareness in aviation systems. In: Garland, D.J., Wise, J.A., Hopkin, V.D. (eds.) Handbook of Aviation Human Factors, pp. 257–275. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ (1999)
Grech, M.R., Neal, A., Yeo, G., Humphreys, M., Smith, S.: An examination of the relationship between workload and fatigue within and across consecutive days of work: is the relationship static or dynamic? J. Occup. Health Psychol. 14(3), 231 (2009)
Matthews, G., Desmond, P.A.: Task-induced fatigue states and simulated driving performance. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. A 55(2), 659–686 (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Peukert, M., Meyer, L., Josefsson, B. (2020). Multi Remote Tower - Challenge or Chance? An Empirical Study of Air Traffic Controllers Performance. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_78
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_78
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60702-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60703-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)