Skip to main content

Turning Ideas into Reality for mHealth Technology Users with Disabilities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters (HCII 2020)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1294))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1484 Accesses

Abstract

Various technology transfer models have been introduced in the literature, and those models have the potential to facilitate the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of emerging technology. Yet, those models are less likely to be suitable to mobile health (mHealth) technology consumers who have disabilities due to lack of user-centered approach to technology transfer. To address the gap, this paper introduced an innovative framework for mHealth technology transfer to those with disabilities. The framework consists of technology concept, technology engineering, technology embedding, and ongoing participatory design. The framework is expected to contribute to usability, accessibility, and safety of consumer mHealth technology for users with disabilities, ultimately leading to enhancement of health-related quality of life and equity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., Youtie, J.: The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Res. Policy 44(1), 34–49 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hilkevics, S., Hilkevics, A.: The comparative analysis of technology transfer models. Entrepreneurship Sustain. Issues 4(4), 540–558 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sung, T.K., Gibson, D.V.: Knowledge and technology transfer: levels and key factors. International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation (ICTPI) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, S.R., Hayter, C.S., Link, A.N.: Models and methods of university technology transfer. Found. Trends® Entrepreneurship 9(6), 571–650 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Song, X., Balamuralikrishna, R.: JOTS v27n1-The process and curriculum of techonology transfer (2001). https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/Winter-Spring-2001/song.html

  6. Choi, H.J.: Technology transfer issues and a new technology transfer model. J. Technol. Stud. 35(1), 49–57 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Autio, E., Laamanen, T.: Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 10(7-8), 643–664 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Shahnavaz, H.: Role of ergonomics in the transfer of technology to industrially developing countries. Ergonomics 43(7), 903–907 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jones, M., Morris, J., Deruyter, F.: Mobile healthcare and people with disabilities: current state and future needs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(3), 515 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pew Research Center. Device Ownership over Time (2016). Accessed 9 May 2016, http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/device-ownership

  11. DeRuyter, F., Jones, M.L., Morris, J.T.: Mobile health apps and needs of people with disabilities: a national survey (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  12. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241–210: 2010-Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010). https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html

  13. Ohnemus, K.R.: Incorporating human factors in the system development life cycle: marketing and management approaches. In: Proceedings of IPCC 1996 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wenner, C.A.: What is Human Factors and Why is it Important? (No. SAND2013–7748C), Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sears, A., Hanson, V.: Representing users in accessibility research. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 445–456. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Metatla, O., et al.: Voice user interfaces in schools: co-designing for inclusion with visually-impaired and sighted pupils. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Buhler, C.: Empowered participation of users with disabilities in R&D projects. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55(4), 645–659 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Steen, M.: The fragility of human-centred design (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Postma, C.E., et al.: Challenges of doing empathic design: experiences from industry. Int. J. Des. 6(1) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, vol. 4. The Free Press, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stoyanov, S.R., et al.: Development and validation of the user version of the mobile application rating scale (uMARS). JMIR mHealth uHealth 4(2), e72 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patch, K., Spellman, J., Wahlbin, K.: Mobile accessibility: How WCAG 2.0 and other W3C/WAI guidelines apply to mobile, W3C (2015). Accessed 30 May 2018, https://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mapping/

  25. Agarwal, S., et al.: Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ 352, i1174 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Maheu, M.M., et al.: The interactive mobile app review toolkit (IMART): a clinical practice-oriented system. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 1(1–4), 3–15 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Eysenbach, G., Consort-EHEALTH Group: CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 13(4), e126 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1831969.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyung Nam Kim .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kim, H.N. (2020). Turning Ideas into Reality for mHealth Technology Users with Disabilities. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60702-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60703-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics