Abstract
Various technology transfer models have been introduced in the literature, and those models have the potential to facilitate the design, development, evaluation, and dissemination of emerging technology. Yet, those models are less likely to be suitable to mobile health (mHealth) technology consumers who have disabilities due to lack of user-centered approach to technology transfer. To address the gap, this paper introduced an innovative framework for mHealth technology transfer to those with disabilities. The framework consists of technology concept, technology engineering, technology embedding, and ongoing participatory design. The framework is expected to contribute to usability, accessibility, and safety of consumer mHealth technology for users with disabilities, ultimately leading to enhancement of health-related quality of life and equity.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bozeman, B., Rimes, H., Youtie, J.: The evolving state-of-the-art in technology transfer research: revisiting the contingent effectiveness model. Res. Policy 44(1), 34–49 (2015)
Hilkevics, S., Hilkevics, A.: The comparative analysis of technology transfer models. Entrepreneurship Sustain. Issues 4(4), 540–558 (2017)
Sung, T.K., Gibson, D.V.: Knowledge and technology transfer: levels and key factors. International Conference on Technology Policy and Innovation (ICTPI) (2000)
Bradley, S.R., Hayter, C.S., Link, A.N.: Models and methods of university technology transfer. Found. Trends® Entrepreneurship 9(6), 571–650 (2013)
Song, X., Balamuralikrishna, R.: JOTS v27n1-The process and curriculum of techonology transfer (2001). https://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOTS/Winter-Spring-2001/song.html
Choi, H.J.: Technology transfer issues and a new technology transfer model. J. Technol. Stud. 35(1), 49–57 (2009)
Autio, E., Laamanen, T.: Measurement and evaluation of technology transfer: review of technology transfer mechanisms and indicators. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 10(7-8), 643–664 (1995)
Shahnavaz, H.: Role of ergonomics in the transfer of technology to industrially developing countries. Ergonomics 43(7), 903–907 (2000)
Jones, M., Morris, J., Deruyter, F.: Mobile healthcare and people with disabilities: current state and future needs. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15(3), 515 (2018)
Pew Research Center. Device Ownership over Time (2016). Accessed 9 May 2016, http://www.pewinternet.org/data-trend/mobile/device-ownership
DeRuyter, F., Jones, M.L., Morris, J.T.: Mobile health apps and needs of people with disabilities: a national survey (2018)
International Organization for Standardization. ISO 9241–210: 2010-Ergonomics of human-system interaction-Part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (2010). https://www.iso.org/standard/77520.html
Ohnemus, K.R.: Incorporating human factors in the system development life cycle: marketing and management approaches. In: Proceedings of IPCC 1996 (1996)
Wenner, C.A.: What is Human Factors and Why is it Important? (No. SAND2013–7748C), Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States) (2013)
Sears, A., Hanson, V.: Representing users in accessibility research. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2011)
Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D., Preece, J.: User-centered design. In: Bainbridge, W. (ed.) Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, vol. 37, no. 4, pp. 445–456. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2004)
Metatla, O., et al.: Voice user interfaces in schools: co-designing for inclusion with visually-impaired and sighted pupils. In: Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2019)
Buhler, C.: Empowered participation of users with disabilities in R&D projects. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 55(4), 645–659 (2001)
Steen, M.: The fragility of human-centred design (2008)
Postma, C.E., et al.: Challenges of doing empathic design: experiences from industry. Int. J. Des. 6(1) (2012)
Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations, vol. 4. The Free Press, New York (1995)
Stoyanov, S.R., et al.: Development and validation of the user version of the mobile application rating scale (uMARS). JMIR mHealth uHealth 4(2), e72 (2016)
Patch, K., Spellman, J., Wahlbin, K.: Mobile accessibility: How WCAG 2.0 and other W3C/WAI guidelines apply to mobile, W3C (2015). Accessed 30 May 2018, https://www.w3.org/TR/mobile-accessibility-mapping/
Agarwal, S., et al.: Guidelines for reporting of health interventions using mobile phones: mobile health (mHealth) evidence reporting and assessment (mERA) checklist. BMJ 352, i1174 (2016)
Maheu, M.M., et al.: The interactive mobile app review toolkit (IMART): a clinical practice-oriented system. J. Technol. Behav. Sci. 1(1–4), 3–15 (2017)
Eysenbach, G., Consort-EHEALTH Group: CONSORT-EHEALTH: improving and standardizing evaluation reports of web-based and mobile health interventions. J. Med. Internet Res. 13(4), e126 (2011)
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1831969.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kim, H.N. (2020). Turning Ideas into Reality for mHealth Technology Users with Disabilities. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Posters. HCII 2020. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1294. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60703-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-60702-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-60703-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)