Abstract
In this study, the efficiency and complexity of four different crossover variants in Differential evolution (DE) algorithm are experimentally studied. Three well-known crossover variants with a newly designed crossover are applied in nine state-of-the-art and one standard DE algorithm. The results obtained from CECĀ 2011 real-world problems showed a significant difference between different DE variants and crossover types in performance and time complexity. Higher time complexity is for Eigen crossover, higher efficiency s for newly designed crossover.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Brest, J., Greiner, S., BoÅ”koviÄ, B., Mernik, M., Žumer, V.: Self-adapting control parameters in differential evolution: a comparative study on numerical benchmark problems. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10, 646ā657 (2006)
Brest, J., MauÄec, M.S., BoÅ”koviÄ, B.: Single objective real-parameter optimization: algorithm jSO. In: 2017 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), pp. 1311ā1318 (2017)
Bujok, P.: Competition of strategies in jSO algorithm. In: Zamuda, A., Das, S., Suganthan, P.N., Panigrahi, B.K. (eds.) Swarm, Evolutionary, and Memetic Computing and Fuzzy and Neural Computing, pp. 113ā121. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37838-7_11
Bujok, P., PolĆ”kovĆ”, R.: Eigenvector crossover in the efficient jSO algorithm. MENDEL 25(1), 65ā72 (2019). https://doi.org/10.13164/mendel.2019.1.065
Bujok, P.: TvrdĆk: Enhanced success-history based parameter adaptation for differential evolution and real-world optimization problems. In: Papa, G., Mernik, M. (eds.) BIOMA, pp. 159ā171. Slovenia, Bioinspired Optimization Methods and their Applications, Bled (2016)
Bujok, P., TvrdĆk, J.: A comparison of various strategies in differential evolution. In: MatouÅ”ek, R. (ed.) MENDEL, 17th International Conference on Soft Computing, pp. 48ā55. Czech Republic, Brno (2011)
Bujok, P., TvrdĆk, J., PolĆ”kovĆ”, R.: Evaluating the performance of shade with competing strategies on CEC 2014 single-parameter test suite. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), vol. 2016, pp. 5002ā5009 (2016)
Das, S., Suganthan, P.N.: Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for CEC 2011 competition on testing evolutionary algorithms on real world optimization problems. Jadavpur University, India and Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Technical report (2010)
Hollander, M., Wolfe, D.: Nonparametric Statistical Methods. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. Wiley (1999)
Lin, C., Qing, A., Feng, Q.: A comparative study of crossover in differential evolution. J. Heuristics 17, 675ā703 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-010-9151-1
Mallipeddi, R., Suganthan, P.N., Pan, Q.K., Tasgetiren, M.F.: Differential evolution algorithm with ensemble of parameters and mutation strategies. Appl. Soft Comput. 11, 1679ā1696 (2011)
Qin, A.K., Huang, V.L., Suganthan, P.N.: Differential evolution algorithm with strategy adaptation for global numerical optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13, 398ā417 (2009)
Storn, R., Price, K.V.: Differential evolution - a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 11, 341ā359 (1997)
Tanabe, R., Fukunaga, A.S.: Improving the search performance of shade using linear population size reduction. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), vol. 2014, pp. 1658ā1665 (2014)
Tanabe, R., Fukunaga, A.: Reevaluating exponential crossover in differential evolution. In: Bartz-Beielstein, T., Branke, J., FilipiÄ, B., Smith, J. (eds.) PPSN 2014. LNCS, vol. 8672, pp. 201ā210. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10762-2_20
Tanabe, R., Fukunaga, A.S.: Success-history based parameter adaptation for differential evolution. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), vol. 2013, pp. 71ā78 (2013)
Tang, L., Dong, Y., Liu, J.: Differential evolution with an individual-dependent mechanism. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(4), 560ā574 (2015)
Wang, Y., Li, H.X., Huang, T., Li, L.: Differential evolution based on covariance matrix learning and bimodal distribution parameter setting. Appl. Soft Comput. 18, 232ā247 (2014)
Weber, M., Neri, F.: Contiguous binomial crossover in differential evolution. In: Rutkowski, L., Korytkowski, M., Scherer, R., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J.M. (eds.) EC/SIDE -2012. LNCS, vol. 7269, pp. 145ā153. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29353-5_17
ZĆ”meÄnĆkovĆ”, H., EinÅ”piglovĆ”, D., PolĆ”kovĆ”, R., Bujok, P.: Is differential evolution rotationally invariant? Tatra Mountains Math. Publ. 72(1), 155ā165 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2478/tmmp-2018-0027
Zhang, J., Sanderson, A.C.: JADE: adaptive differential evolution with optional external archive. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 13, 945ā958 (2009)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
Ā© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bujok, P. (2020). On the Performance and Complexity of Crossover in Differential Evolution Algorithm. In: Rutkowski, L., Scherer, R., Korytkowski, M., Pedrycz, W., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zurada, J.M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence and Soft Computing. ICAISC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12415. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61401-0_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61401-0_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61400-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61401-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)