Skip to main content

InCREDulity in Artificial Societies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Social Simulation (ESSA 2019)

Abstract

This paper describes an artificial society in which the simulated agents behave and interact based on a computational architecture informed by insights from one of the leading social psychological theories in the scientific study of secularization and religion: “credibility-enhancing displays” (or CREDs) theory. After introducing the key elements of the theory and outlining the computational architecture of our CRED model, we present some of our initial simulation results. These efforts are intended to advance the quest within social simulation for more authentic artificial societies and more plausible human-like agents with complex interactive and interpretative capacities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J. Henrich, The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30(4), 244–260 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. J. A. Lanman, M. D. Buhrmester, Religious actions speak louder than words: exposure to credibility-enhancing displays predicts theism. Relig. Brain Behav. 1–14 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.K. Willard, L. Cingl, Testing theories of secularization and religious belief in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. Evol. Hum. Behav. 38(5), 604–615 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. L. R. Maij et al., Mentalizing skills do not differentiate believers from non-believers, but credibility enhancing displays do. PLoS ONE 12(8) (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. J. Langston, D. Speed, and T. J. Coleman, Predicting age of atheism: credibility enhancing displays and religious importance, choice, and conflict in family of upbringing. Relig. Brain Behav. pp. 1–19 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  6. H. Turpin, M. Andersen, J.A. Lanman, CREDs, CRUDs, and Catholic scandals: experimentally examining the effects of religious paragon behavior on co-religionist belief. Relig. Brain Behav. 9(2), 143–155 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. G.T. Kraft-Todd, B. Bollinger, K. Gillingham, S. Lamp, D.G. Rand, Credibility-enhancing displays promote the provision of non-normative public goods. Nature 563(7730), 245 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. I. Puga-Gonzalez, W.J. Wildman, S.Y. Diallo, F.L. Shults, “Minority Integration in a Western City: An Agent-Based Modeling Approach”, in Human Simulation: Perspectives, Insights, and Applications. Springer Nature, Switzerland, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  9. F. L. Shults, W. J. Wildman, S. Diallo, I. Puga-Gonzalez, D. Voas, The Artificial Society Analytics Platform. Proc. 2018 Soc. Simul. Conf. 1–12 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Stein, Large sample properties of simulations using Latin hypercube sampling. Technometrics 29(2), 143–151 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  11. R. Carnell, lhs: Latin Hypercube Samples. R package version 0.16, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. C. Team, R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna Austria (2017). https://www.r-project.org

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was completed while some of the authors were supported by grants from The Research Council of Norway (“Modeling Religion in Norway,” grant #250449) and the John Templeton Foundation (“Modeling Religion Project,” grant #43288).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Puga-Gonzalez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Puga-Gonzalez, I., Wildman, W.J., McCaffree, K., Cragun, R.T., Shults, F.L. (2021). InCREDulity in Artificial Societies. In: Ahrweiler, P., Neumann, M. (eds) Advances in Social Simulation. ESSA 2019. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61503-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics