Skip to main content

Data-Consistency in Latent Space and Online Update Strategy to Guide GAN for Fast MRI Reconstruction

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction (MLMIR 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 12450))

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is one of the most commonly used modalities in medical imaging, and one of the main limitations is its slow scanning and reconstruction speed. Recently, deep learning used for compressed sensing (CS) methods have been proposed to accelerate the acquisition by undersampling in the K-space and reconstruct images with neural networks. However, there are still some challenges remained: First, directly training networks based on L1/L2 distance to the target fully sampled images may lead to fuzzy reconstruction images because L1/L2 loss only enforces the overall image or patch similarity, but does not consider the local details such as anatomical sharpness. Second, Generative Adversarial Networks (GAN) can partially solve this problem. The undersampling image gets the latent space through the encoder, and the image is reconstructed by the decoder based on GAN loss, but it may generate unrealistic details by lacking of constraints in K-space domain. Third, most of the networks after training are fixed and have limited adaptation capability in the inference time, and the patient-specific information cannot be effectively used. To resolve these challenges, we proposed a new compressed sensing GAN reconstruction method, and there are two main contributions: (1) We proposed a encoder-decoder structure, which guided GAN optimization strategy data-consistency in latent space to improve the reconstruction quality such as preserving more local details and improving the anatomical sharpness while constraining GAN to follow the data distribution in the K-space to prevent the unrealistic details. (2) An online update strategy is used to find the best representation in the latent space for the underlying patient, and the reconstruct result can be further improved by incorporating the patient-specific information. Extensive experimental results show the effectiveness of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Pruessmann, K.P., Weiger, M., Scheidegger, M.B., et al.: SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 42, 952–962 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. King, K.F.: ASSET-parallel imaging on the GE scanner. In: International Workshop on Parallel MRI (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Griswold, M.A., Jakob, P.M., Heidemann, R.M., et al.: Generalized auto-calibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Reson. Med. 47, 1202–1210 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lustig, M., Pauly, J.: SPIRiT: iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn. Reson. Med. 64, 457–471 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Candes, E.J., Romberg, J., Tao, T., et al.: Stable signal recovery from incomplete and inaccurate measurements. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 59(8), 1207–1223 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Lustig, M., Donoho, D.L., Pauly, J.M., et al.: Sparse MRI: the application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn. Reson. Med. 58(6), 1182–1195 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang, S., Su, Z., Ying, L., et al.: Accelerating magnetic resonance imaging via deep learning. In: International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging, pp. 514–517 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Schlemper, J., Caballero, J., Hajnal, J.V., et al.: A Deep Cascade of Convolutional Neural Networks for MR Image Reconstruction. arXiv\(:\) Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yang, Y., Sun, J., Li, H., et al.: ADMM-CSNet: a deep learning approach for image compressive sensing. EEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., 1 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goodfellow, I., Pougetabadie, J., Mirza, M., et al.: Generative adversarial nets. In: Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 2672–2680 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, S., Dong, H., Yang, G., et al.: Deep De-Aliasing for Fast Compressive Sensing MRI. arXiv\(:\) Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ronneberger, O., Fischer, P., Brox, T.: U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Navab, N., Hornegger, J., Wells, W.M., Frangi, A.F. (eds.) MICCAI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9351, pp. 234–241. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Alec, R., Luke, M., Soumith, C.: Unsupervised Representation Learning with Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Networks. arXiv:1511.06434

  14. Mardani, M., Gong, E., Cheng, J.Y., et al.: Deep generative adversarial networks for compressed sensing MRI. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 38, 167–179 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Mao, X., et al.: Least squares generative adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhu, J.-Y., et al.: Unpaired image-to-image translation using cycle-consistent adversarial networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, P., Wang, F., Xu, W., Li, Yu.: Multi-channel generative adversarial network for parallel magnetic resonance image reconstruction in K-space. In: Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A., Davatzikos, C., Alberola-López, C., Fichtinger, G. (eds.) MICCAI 2018. LNCS, vol. 11070, pp. 180–188. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00928-1_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Isola, P., et al.: Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 5967–5976 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  19. He, K., et al.: Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp. 770–778 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Liao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chen, S., Sun, S., Huang, X., Shen, D., Wang, Q., Liao, S. (2020). Data-Consistency in Latent Space and Online Update Strategy to Guide GAN for Fast MRI Reconstruction. In: Deeba, F., Johnson, P., Würfl, T., Ye, J.C. (eds) Machine Learning for Medical Image Reconstruction. MLMIR 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61598-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61598-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-61597-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-61598-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics