Abstract
Processing quantity values in industry applications is often arduous and costly due to different systems of units and countless naming and formatting conventions. As semantic technology promises to alleviate the situation, we consider using existing ontologies of units of measure to improve data processing capabilities of a cloud-based semantic platform for operating digital twins of real industry assets. We analyse two well-known ontologies: OM, the Ontology of units of Measure, and QUDT, the Quantities, Units, Dimensions and Types ontology. These ontologies are excellent resources, but do not meet all our requirements. We discuss suitable modelling choices for representing quantities, dimensions and units of measure and we outline the process we followed to adapt relevant definitions from OM and QUDT into a new ontology of units of measure that better meets our needs. Compared with the alternative of manually creating the ontology from scratch, the development and maintenance costs and duration were reduced significantly. We believe this approach will achieve similar benefits in other ontology engineering efforts.
This work has been supported by Aker Solutions, DNV GL, Sesam and SIRIUS labs. A special thanks to Kaia Means (DNV GL) for reviewing this document.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
- 3.
- 4.
- 5.
- 6.
- 7.
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17.
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21.
- 22.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
- 26.
- 27.
- 28.
- 29.
- 30.
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.
References
Arp, R., Smith, B., Spear, A.D.: Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology. MIT Press, Cambridge (2015)
Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology design patterns. In: Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.) Handbook on Ontologies. IHIS, pp. 221–243. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92673-3_10
Keil, J.M., Schindler, S.: Comparison and evaluation of ontologies for units of measurement. Semant. Web J. 10(1), 33–51 (2019)
Noy, N., Rector, A., Hayes, P., Welty, C.: Defining N-ary relations on the semantic web (W3C working note). Technical report, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2006). https://www.w3.org/TR/swbp-n-aryRelations/
Rijgersberg, H., van Assem, M., Top, J.: Ontology of units of measure and related concepts. Semant. Web J. 4(1), 3–13 (2013)
Skjæveland, M.G., Lupp, D.P., Karlsen, L.H., Forssell, H.: Practical ontology pattern instantiation, discovery, and maintenance with reasonable ontology templates. In: Vrandečić, D., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11136, pp. 477–494. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-00671-6_28
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Martín-Recuerda, F. et al. (2020). Revisiting Ontologies of Units of Measure for Harmonising Quantity Values – A Use Case. In: Pan, J.Z., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2020. ISWC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12507. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_34
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_34
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62465-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62466-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)