Skip to main content

The Case for Invisibility: Understanding and Improving Agency in Black Mirror’s Bandersnatch and Other Interactive Digital Narrative Works

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Interactive Storytelling (ICIDS 2020)

Abstract

With the launch and popularity of Bandersnatch (2018), interactive storytelling reached a mass audience in a different way to earlier works. However, as a narrative experience, Bandersnatch belongs to a particular class of Interactive Digital Narratives (IDNs): highly restrictive, nonlinear, branching structure films that offer limited agency and, in many ways, have less to offer than more sophisticated IDNs. While the simple format is appealing to new audiences, there is clearly scope for improvement. In this paper, Bandersnatch is examined as a representative of its format in an attempt to identify alternative design choices for improved agency, as well as assessing the choices’ suitability for the format. The methodology for the analysis is Hartmut Koenitz’s SPP model as well as its extension, the hermeneutic strip, which is applied to understand and assess the experienced agency. The final reflection on alternative design recommendations for Bandersnatch type works demonstrates that, by implementing features of invisible agency, the overall feeling of control of the player could be improved without losing narrative momentum. The improvements could be achieved by maintaining state of the behavioural tendencies (e.g., risk-taking behaviour) of the audience in their decision-making process and screening plotlines or endings that match their assessed tendencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Vice Magazine: Netflix Is Going to Make a Lot More Weird, Interactive Movies Likes ‘Bandersnatch’. https://www.vice.com/en_us/article/7xnq3a/netflix-more-interactive-movies-like-bandersnatch-rom-coms-todd-yellin-interview-vgtrn. Accessed 23 June 2020

  2. CrtlMovie. https://www.ctrlmovie.com. Accessed 20 May 2020

  3. Harrell, D.F., Zhu, J.: Agency play: dimensions of agency for interactive narrative design. In: AAAI Spring Symposium: Intelligent Narrative Technologies II, Stanford, pp 44–52 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Koenitz, H.: Towards a specific theory of interactive digital narrative. In: Koenitz, H., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., Sezen, T.İ. (eds.) Interactive Digital Narrative, pp. 96–101. Routledge, New York (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roth, C., van Nuenen, T., Koenitz, H.: Ludonarrative hermeneutics: a way out and the narrative paradox. In: Rouse, R., Koenitz, H., Haahr, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2018. LNCS, vol. 11318, pp. 93–106. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Roth, C., Koenitz, H.: Bandersnatch, yea or nay? Reception and user experience of an interactive digital narrative video. In: Proceedings of the 2019 ACM International Conference on Interactive Experiences for TV and Online Video, pp. 247–254. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. These Heterogenous Tasks: Standard Patterns in Choice-Based Games. https://heterogenoustasks.wordpress.com/2015/01/26/standard-patterns-in-choice-based-games/. Accessed 23 June 2020

  8. Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace, 2nd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge/London (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Emily Short’s Interactive Storytelling: Bandersnatch (Netflix). https://emshort.blog/2019/02/19/39189/. Accessed 20 June 2020

  10. Kohlhoff, L., Nack, F.: How relevant is your choice?: user engagement and perceived agency in interactive digital narratives on video streaming platforms. In: Cardona-Rivera, R.E., Sullivan, A., Young, R.M. (eds.) Interactive Storytelling: 12th International Conference on Interactive Digital Storytelling, ICIDS 2019, Little Cottonwood Canyon, UT, USA, November 19–22, 2019, Proceedings, pp. 73–85. Springer, Cham (2019)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Şengün, S.: Silent hill 2 and the curious case of invisible agency. In: Koenitz, H., Sezen, T.I., Ferri, G., Haahr, M., Sezen, D., Çatak, G. (eds.) ICIDS 2013. LNCS, vol. 8230, pp. 180–185. Springer, Cham (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02756-2_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Marie Rezk .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Rezk, A.M., Haahr, M. (2020). The Case for Invisibility: Understanding and Improving Agency in Black Mirror’s Bandersnatch and Other Interactive Digital Narrative Works. In: Bosser, AG., Millard, D.E., Hargood, C. (eds) Interactive Storytelling. ICIDS 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12497. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62516-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62516-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62515-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62516-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics