Skip to main content

Saddle-Point Method in Terminal Control with Sections in Phase Constraints

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Optimization and Applications (OPTIMA 2020)

Abstract

A new approach to solving terminal control problems with phase constraints, based on saddle-point sufficient optimality conditions, is considered. The basis of the approach is Lagrangian formalism and duality theory. We study linear controlled dynamics in the presence of phase constraints. The cross section of phase constraints at certain points in time leads to the appearance of new intermediate finite-dimensional convex programming problems. In fact, the optimal control problem, defined over the entire time interval, is split into a number of independent intermediate subproblems, each of which is defined in its own sub-segment. Combining the solutions of these subproblems together, we can obtain solutions5 to the original problem on the entire time interval. To this end, a gradient flow is launched to solve all intermediate problems at the same time. The convergence of computing technology to the solution of the optimal control problem in all variables is proved.

Supported by the Russian Science Foundation (Research Project 18-01-00312).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Antipin, A.S., Khoroshilova, E.V.: Linear programming and dynamics. Ural Math. J. 1(1), 3–19 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Antipin, A.S., Khoroshilova, E.V.: Saddle-point approach to solving problem of optimal control with fixed ends. J. Global Optim. 65(1), 3–17 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Antipin, A.S., Khoroshilova, E.V.: On methods of terminal control with boundary value problems: Lagrange approach. In: Goldengorin, B. (ed.) Optimization and Applications in Control and Data Sciences, pp. 17–49. Springer, New York (2016)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Antipin, A.S., Khoroshilova, E.V.: Lagrangian as a tool for solving linear optimal control problems with state constraints. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Optimal Control and Differential Games Dedicated to L.S. Pontryagin on the Occasion of His 110th Birthday, pp. 23–26 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antipin, A., Khoroshilova, E.: Controlled dynamic model with boundary-value problem of minimizing a sensitivity function. Optim. Lett. 13(3), 451–473 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-017-1216-8

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Antipin, A.S., Khoroshilova, E.V.: Dynamics, phase constraints, and linear programming. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 60(2), 184–202 (2020)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Dmitruk, A.V.: Maximum principle for the general optimal control problem with phase and regular mixed constraints. Comput. Math. Model 4, 364–377 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Dykhta, V., Samsonyuk, O.: Some applications of Hamilton-Jacobi inequalities for classical and impulsive optimal control problems. Eur. J. Control 17(1), 55–69 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Gornov, A.Y., Tyatyushkin, A.I., Finkelstein, E.A.: Numerical methods for solving terminal optimal control problems. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 56(2), 221–234 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartl, R.F., Sethi, S.P., Vickson, R.G.: A survey of the maximum principles for optimal control problems with state constraints. SIAM Rev. 37(2), 181–218 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Mayne, D.Q., Rawlings, J.B., Rao, C.V., Scokaert, P.O.M.: Survey constrained model predictive control: stability and optimality. Automatica (J. IFAC) 36(6), 789–814 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pales, Z., Zeidan, V.: Optimal control problems with set-valued control and state constraints. SIAM J. Optim. 14(2), 334–358 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Pytlak, R.: Numerical Methods for Optimal Control Problems with State Constraints. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 1707, p. 214p. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (1999)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Rao, A.V.: A Survey of Numerical Methods for Optimal Control. Advances in the Astronautical Sciences. Preprint AAS 09-334 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena Khoroshilova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Antipin, A., Khoroshilova, E. (2020). Saddle-Point Method in Terminal Control with Sections in Phase Constraints. In: Olenev, N., Evtushenko, Y., Khachay, M., Malkova, V. (eds) Optimization and Applications. OPTIMA 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12422. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62867-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics