Skip to main content

Activity-selection Behavior and Optimal User-distribution in Q&A Websites

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 12496))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Based on various factors such as experience, interest, and motivation, users in any system choose to perform certain activities more than the others. In this study, we investigate a similar behavior and its dynamics in the websites of StackExchange. We find that most of the users in these websites tend to contribute predominantly to one of the activities available on these websites. Such a behavior yields a high-level distribution of users across the activities, referred to as User-distribution. We find that this distribution varies for different websites of StackExchange. We also observe that the users contributing to different activities trigger each other to provide more contribution. Using these insights, we build a model that explains the effect of change in user-distribution on the amount of knowledge produced on these websites. The model shows that one can formulate an optimal ecosystem by motivating the right kind of users, which leads to the maximum fostering of knowledge on these websites.

A preliminary version of this work reporting the activity-selection behavior of users is published here  [7].

J. S. Saini—The author contributed while he was a student at Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://archive.org/download/stackexchange.

References

  1. Adamic, L.A., Zhang, J., Bakshy, E., Ackerman, M.S.: Knowledge sharing and yahoo answers: everyone knows something. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 665–674. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Rajagopalan, S., Srikant, R., Xu, Y.: Mining newsgroups using networks arising from social behavior. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 529–535. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Arazy, O., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Nov, O., Daxenberger, J., Balestra, M., Cheshire, C.: On the ‘how’ and ‘why’ of emergent role behaviors in Wikipedia. In: Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, vol. 35 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chhabra, A., Iyengar, S.S.: Characterizing the triggering phenomenon in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, p. 11. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chhabra, A., Iyengar, S.: How does knowledge come by? arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.06946 (2017)

  6. Chhabra, A., Iyengar, S., Saini, P., Bhat, R.S.: Presence of an ecosystem: a catalyst in the knowledge building process in crowdsourced annotation environments. In: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM 2015) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chhabra, A., RS Iyengar, S.: Activity-selection behavior of users in StackExchange websites. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, pp. 105–106 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Furtado, A., Andrade, N., Oliveira, N., Brasileiro, F.: Contributor profiles, their dynamics, and their importance in five q&a sites. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 1237–1252. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Golder, S.A., Donath, J.: Social roles in electronic communities. Internet Res. 5, 19–22 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. He, J., Tan, A.H., Tan, C.L., Sung, S.Y.: On quantitative evaluation of clustering systems. In: Wu, W., Xiong, H., Shekhar, S. (eds.) Clustering and Information Retrieval. Network Theory and Applications, vol. 11, pp. 105–133. Springer, Boston (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-0227-8_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Iacopini, I., Milojević, S., Latora, V.: Network dynamics of innovation processes. Phys. Rev. Lett. 120(4), 048301 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, J., Ram, S.: Who does what: collaboration patterns in the Wikipedia and their impact on article quality. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. (TMIS) 2(2), 11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marengo, L., Zeppini, P.: The arrival of the new. J. Evol. Econ. 26(1), 171–194 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-015-0438-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rezgui, A., Crowston, K.: Stigmergic coordination in Wikipedia. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Open Collaboration, p. 19. ACM (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tausczik, Y.R., Pennebaker, J.W.: Participation in an online mathematics community: differentiating motivations to add. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 207–216. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Tria, F., Loreto, V., Servedio, V.D.P., Strogatz, S.H.: The dynamics of correlated novelties. Sci. Rep. 4, 5890 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Welser, H.T., Gleave, E., Fisher, D., Smith, M.: Visualizing the signatures of social roles in online discussion groups. J. Soc. Struct. 8(2), 1–32 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yang, J., Tao, K., Bozzon, A., Houben, G.-J.: Sparrows and owls: characterisation of expert behaviour in StackOverflow. In: Dimitrova, V., Kuflik, T., Chin, D., Ricci, F., Dolog, P., Houben, G.-J. (eds.) UMAP 2014. LNCS, vol. 8538, pp. 266–277. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08786-3_23

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by WOS-A, Department of Science and Technology, India [SR/WOS-A/ET-1058/2014] and CSRI, Department of Science and Technology, India [SR/CSRI/344/2016].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anamika Chhabra .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Chhabra, A., Iyengar, S.R.S., Saini, J.S., Malik, V. (2020). Activity-selection Behavior and Optimal User-distribution in Q&A Websites. In: Nguyen, N.T., Hoang, B.H., Huynh, C.P., Hwang, D., Trawiński, B., Vossen, G. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12496. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63007-2_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63007-2_67

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63006-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63007-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics