Skip to main content

Ready for Computing Science? A Closer Look at Personality, Interests and Self-concept of Girls and Boys at Secondary Level

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Informatics in Schools. Engaging Learners in Computational Thinking (ISSEP 2020)

Abstract

Among school children, the interest in dealing with computing science varies between different age groups and countries, but it can be observed that it tends to decline among young women, and it is mostly men who gain a foothold in this domain. Various programs and activities are meant to increase the interest of all our children, but measurement instruments to collect baseline data and interpret effects of (classroom) interventions are rare.

In this work, we present a framework that allows us for collecting measures (personality traits, interests, and self-concept) from different age groups, and we use it to take a closer look at girls and boys at lower secondary school level. We report on measurable similarities as well as differences and, in the context of our own teaching interventions, we come up with first recommendations and suggestions in order to encourage secondary school teachers and curriculum developers to also address the needs and interests of girls and boys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://data.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/2016-05-04.

  2. 2.

    https://inventures.eu/game-with-a-mission-wins-innovation-award/4539/.

References

  1. Ackerman, P., Kanfer, R., Beier, M.: Trait complex, cognitive ability, and domain knowledge predictors of baccalaureate success, stem persistence, and gender differences. J. Educ. Psychol. 105, 911 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aivaloglou, E., Hermans, F.: How is programming taught in code clubs? Exploring the experiences and gender perceptions of code club teachers. In: Proceedings of the 19th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. Koli Calling 2019, Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3364510.3364514

  3. Bollin, A., Demarle-Meusel, H., Kesselbacher, M., Mößlacher, C., Rohrer, M., Sylle, J.: The Bebras contest in Austria – do personality, self-concept and general interests play an influential role? In: Pozdniakov, S.N., Dagienė, V. (eds.) ISSEP 2018. LNCS, vol. 11169, pp. 283–294. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02750-6_22

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Babarović, T., Devic, I., Burusic, J.: Fitting the STEM interests of middle school children into RIASEC structural space. Int. J. Educ. Vocat. Guidance (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-018-9371-8

  5. Sabitzer, B., Stefan Pasterk, S.E.: Brain-based teaching in computer science - neurodidactical proposals for effective teaching. In: Proceedings of the 13th KOLI Calling Conference. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bergmann, C., Eder, F.: AIST-R. Allgemeiner Interessen-Struktur-Test mit Umwelt-Struktur-Test (UST-R) - Revision. Manual. Hogrefe, 1 edn. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blum, L.: Women in computer science: the Carnegie Mellon experience (2001). http://www.cs.cmu.edu/lblum/papers/merged%20gh%20proposal2000.pdf

  8. Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S., Montoya, A., Jiang, L.: Why are some stem fields more gender balanced than others? Psychol. Bull. 143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000052

  9. Dagienė, V., Futschek, G.: Bebras international contest on informatics and computer literacy: criteria for good tasks. In: Mittermeir, R.T., Sysło, M.M. (eds.) ISSEP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5090, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-69924-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Dierks, P.O., Höffler, T.N., Blankenburg, J.S., Peters, H., Parchmann, I.: Interest in science: a RIASEC-based analysis of students’ interests. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 38(2), 238–258 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1138337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ebner, M., Adams, S., Bollin, A., Kopp, M., Teufel, M.: Digital gestütztes Lehren mittels innovativem MOOC-Konzept (in German). journal für lehrerInnenbildung 20(1), 68–77 (2020). https://doi.org/10.35468/jlb-01-2020_05

  12. Frenkel, K.A.: Women and computing. Commun. ACM 33(11), 34–46 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1145/92755.92756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Grandl, M., Ebner, M.: Informatische Grundbildung - ein Ländervergleich. Medienimpulse 55(2), 1–17 (2017). https://medienimpulse.at/article/view/mi1069

  14. Holland, J.: Exploring careers with a typology - what we have learned and some new directions. Am. Psychol. 51(4), 397–406 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kelleher, C., Pausch, R., Kiesler, S.: Storytelling Alice motivates middle school girls to learn computer programming. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2007, pp. 1455–1464. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2007). https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240844

  16. Kunter, M., et al.: PISA 2000: Dokumentation der Erhebungsinstrumente. Materialien aus der Bildungsforschung, 72 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mujkanovic, A., Bollin, A.: Improving learning outcomes through systematic group reformation - the role of skills and personality in software engineering education. In: 2016 IEEE First International Conference on Connected Health: Applications, Systems and Engineering Technologies (CHASE), pp. 97–103 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pasterk, S., Bollin, A.: Digital literacy or computer science: where do information technology related primary education models focus on? In: 15th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), Stary Smokovec, Slovakia (2017). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICETA.2017.8102517

  19. Proyer, R., Häusler, J.: Gender differences in vocational interests and their stability across different assessment methods. Swiss J. Psychol. 66 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185.66.4.243

  20. Resnick, M., et al.: Scratch: programming for all. Commun. ACM 52(11), 60–67 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1145/1592761.1592779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Slany, W.: Pocket code: a scratch-like integrated development environment for your phone. In: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2014 ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Systems, Programming, and Applications: Software for Humanity, SPLASH 2014, pp. 35–36. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2660252.2664662

  22. Pasterk, S., Barbara Sabitzer, H.D.M.A.B.: Informatics-lab: attracting primary school pupils for computer science. In: Proceedings of the 14th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, and Technology, San José, Costa Rica, July 2016

    Google Scholar 

  23. Stoll, G., Rieger, S., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Roberts, B.: Vocational interests assessed at the end of high school predict life outcomes assessed 10 years later over and above IQ and big five personality traits. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 113 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000117

  24. Stout, J., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., McManus, M.: Steming the tide: using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 100, 255–270 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wright, R.N., Nadler, S.J., Nguyen, T.D., Sanchez Gomez, C.N., Wright, H.M.: Living-learning community for women in computer science at Rutgers. In: Proceedings of the 50th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, SIGCSE 2019, pp. 286–292. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3287324.3287449

  26. Xu, H., Tracey, T.: Stability and change in interests: a longitudinal examination of grades 7 through college. J. Vocat. Behav. 93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2016.02.002

  27. Yamada, Y., et al.: The impacts of personal characteristic on educational effectiveness in controlled-project based learning on software intensive systems development. In: 2014 IEEE 27th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE & T), pp. 119–128. IEEE, April 2014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Bollin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bollin, A., Kesselbacher, M., Mößlacher, C. (2020). Ready for Computing Science? A Closer Look at Personality, Interests and Self-concept of Girls and Boys at Secondary Level. In: Kori, K., Laanpere, M. (eds) Informatics in Schools. Engaging Learners in Computational Thinking. ISSEP 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12518. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63212-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63212-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63211-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63212-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics