Skip to main content

Building an Online Learning Question Map Through Mining Discussion Content

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovative Technologies and Learning (ICITL 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12555))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1935 Accesses

Abstract

Information and communication technology (ICT) has been widely accepted in education since the COVID-19 outbreak. Today, the convenience that ICT provides in education makes learning independent of time and place. However, compared to face-to-face learning, ICT online learning has the difficulty of finding student questions efficiently. One of the ways to solve this problem is through finding their questions from the online discussion content. With online learning, teachers and students usually send out questions and receive answers on a discussion board without the limitations of time or place. However, because liquid learning is quite convenient, people tend to solve problems in short online texts with a lack of detailed information to express ideas in an online environment. Therefore, the ICT online education environment may result in misunderstandings between teachers and students. For teachers and students to better understand each other’s views, this study aims to classify discussions into a hierarchical structure, named a question map, with several types of learning questions to clarify the views of teachers and students. In addition, this study attempts to extend the description of possible omissions in short texts by using external resources prior to classification. In brief, by applying short text hierarchical classification, this study constructs a question map that can highlight each student’s learning problems and inform the instructor where the main focus of the future course should be, thus improving the ICT education environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Al-Samarraie, H., Teo, T., Abbas, M.: Can structured representation enhance students’ thinking skills for better understanding of e-learning content? Comput. Educ. 69, 463–473 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Blei, D., Ng, A., Jordan, M.: Latent Dirichlet allocation. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Deerwester, S., Dumais, S., Furnas, G., Landauer, T., Harshman, R.: Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. 41(6), 391–407 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hofmann, T.. Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hou, W.F., Liu, Q., Cao, L.B.: Cognitive Aspects-Based Short Text Representation with Named Entity, Concept and Knowledge. Appl. Sci. Basel 10(14) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kale, U.: Technology valued? observation and review activities to enhance future teachers’ utility value toward technology integration. Comput. Educ. 117, 160–174 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kern, R., Granitzer, M.: Efficient linear text segmentation based on information retrieval techniques. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the International Conference on Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Njikam, A.N.S., Zhao, H.: CharTeC-Net: an efficient and lightweight character-based convolutional network for text classification. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pota, M., Esposito, M., De Pietro, G., Fujita, H.: Best practices of convolutional neural networks for question classification. Appl. Sci. Basel 10(14) (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raković, M., Marzouk, Z., Liaqat, A., Winne, P.H., Nesbit, J.C.: Fine grained analysis of students’ online discussion posts. Comput. Educ. 157, 103982 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saura, J.R., Reyes-Menendez, A., Bennett, D.R.: How to extract meaningful insights from UGC: a knowledge-based method applied to education. Appl. Sci. Basel 9(21) (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yun, E.: Review of trends in physics education research using topic modeling. J. Baltic Sci. Educ. 19(3), 388–400 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hei Chia Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, H.C., Zhao, Y.L. (2020). Building an Online Learning Question Map Through Mining Discussion Content. In: Huang, TC., Wu, TT., Barroso, J., Sandnes, F.E., Martins, P., Huang, YM. (eds) Innovative Technologies and Learning. ICITL 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12555. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63885-6_41

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-63884-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-63885-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics